ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1143

Preferences of Biologic Treatment Characteristics Among Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Who Are Current Biologic Therapy Users

David M. Kern1, Angela E. Williams2, Ozgur Tunceli1, Bingcao Wu1, Judy Stephenson1, Laura Horne3 and Alfred Sackeyfio4, 1HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, 2MedImmune, LLC, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 3AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, 4AstraZeneca, Manchester, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, patient preferences and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: To identify the most and least important characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treatment according to patients currently on biologic therapy.

Methods: From the HealthCore Integrated Research Environment, RA patients (ICD-9-CM: 714.0x) ≥18 years old with ≥1 claim for a biologic therapy between 5/1/2012 and 7/31/2013 were identified. All eligible patients were targeted to complete a survey measuring their quality of life, RA treatment history, treatment satisfaction, and treatment preferences, among other measures. The Maximum Difference Scaling Instrument (MaxDiff) was used to determine what characteristics of RA treatments (e.g., efficacy; side effects; costs; how, when, and where the medication is administered) were most and least important to the patients. A MaxDiff score <100 denotes characteristics that are less important to the patient, while a score >100 signifies characteristics of higher importance.

Results:

There were 9,802 patients meeting all study criteria, of which 219 completed a patient survey. Survey patients were 56 years old on average, 82% were female, 89% were white, and 51% had at least a 4-year college degree.  29% of patients were currently taking etanercept, while the next most common treatments were adalimumab (22%), infliximab (17%), and abatacept (12%).

The MaxDiff results identified that the 3 most important characteristics of RA treatment were related to the efficacy of the treatment: ‘Keeps my disease from getting worse’ (MaxDiff score = 209), ‘Improves my physical abilities’ (199), and ‘Reduces Pain’ (195). ‘Potential side effects’ (117) and ‘How long treatment effects last’ (102) were neither relatively important or unimportant to the patients surveyed, while ‘How quickly (within a few weeks)’ treatment works (70) and ‘Personal costs’ (67) were seen as less important. The least important characteristics were those that identified the ‘how’, ‘when’, and ‘where’ of treatment administration: ‘How treatment is given (oral, injection, IV, etc.)’ (15), ‘How often treatment must be taken’ (13), and ‘Where treatment is given (home, doctor’s office, hospital, etc.)’ (13). Results were consistent across groups based on their current biologic therapy.

A separate question found that 75% of patients would like to take their medication at home if it were possible; however, the MaxDiff results show that relative to efficacy this is not a priority for patients. Additionally, when asked why patients stopped taking prior biologic therapy the statement ‘I didn’t feel that the drug was working’ was cited as a major reason 66% of the time, more than any other reason. ‘I don’t like needles’ and ‘I don’t like infusions’ were cited as major reasons for stopping therapy just 1% and 3% of the time, respectively; while the cost of treatment and side effects were a major reason 12% and 21% of the time, respectively.  

Conclusion: The effectiveness of RA treatment is the most important attribute according to patients currently treated with biologic therapy, while administration characteristics were seen as relatively unimportant. Reducing symptoms, improving physical abilities, and slowing disease progression should be considered as primary outcomes in studies comparing RA treatments.


Disclosure:

D. M. Kern,

Healthcore, Inc.,

3;

A. E. Williams,

MedImmune,

3;

O. Tunceli,

Healthcore, Inc.,

3;

B. Wu,

HealthCore, Inc.,

3;

J. Stephenson,

HealthCore, Inc.,

3;

L. Horne,

AstraZeneca,

1,

AstraZeneca,

3;

A. Sackeyfio,

AstraZeneca,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/preferences-of-biologic-treatment-characteristics-among-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-who-are-current-biologic-therapy-users/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology