ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1188

Reproducibility of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients and Healthy Subjects

Jakob M. Møller1, Inge Juul Sorensen2, Mikkel Ostergaard3, Henrik Thomsen1, Ole Rintek Madsen4 and Susanne Juhl Pedersen5, 1Department of Radiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Glostrup, Denmark, 3Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4Rheumatology, Copenhagen University Hospital at Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark, 5Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Copenhagen, Denmark

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spondylarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases: Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Reproducibility of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Weighted Imaging In Axial Spondyloarthritis Patients and Healthy Subjects.

Background/Purpose: Diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique where the image contrast is dependent on the diffusion of the extracellular free water molecules. DWI is widely used in oncology imaging, but only few papers address DWI in spondyloarthritis (SpA). From DWI the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) can be calculated and hence the diffusion in a region of interest (ROI) can be quantified. The water diffusion reflects the cellularity and thus it may be used as a quantification of inflammatory cells. The aim of the study was to measure the reproducibility of DWI in SpA patients and healthy subjects.

Methods: 25 SpA patients (13 females, mean age 36.1 years (SD 9.6); 12 males, mean age 42.3 (SD10.8) and 24 healthy subjects (13 females, mean age 42.7 (SD 13.2); 11 males, mean age 45.3 (SD 7.5)) were MRI examined at 1.5T two times with a mean interval of 6.8 days (SD 0.9). A 5mm (gap 1.2mm) sagittal single-shot echo-planar imaging DW sequence with four b values (0;50;500;800) and a resolution of 2mm x 1.65mm was performed on Th6 to L5. ADC maps were calculated based on all b values. The MRIs were anonymized and read in random order without information on time point and clinical data. On ADC maps 50mm2 circular ROIs were placed in each vertebral corner just inside cortex. ADC was measured on the sagittal slice in the middle of the spine and on the adjacent slice to the right and left to the middle. ADCs from the four ROIs were pooled. Another ROI was placed in the right and left pedicle and in the spinous process from L1 to L5. The inter-reader variability was measured by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Intra-reader variability was measured by a second reading of the examinations at time point (TP) 2.

Results: Overall ICC of the vertebral bodies between TP1 and TP2 was 0.80 (95% CI: 0,77-0.83). At TP1, ICC between the right and middle slice was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90) and between left and middle slice 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.90). Intra-reader reliability was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.93-0.95). For the right pedicle ICC was 0.44 (95% CI: 0.33-0.54), for the left pedicle 0.49 (95% CI: 0.39-0.58), for the spinous processes 0.20 (95% CI: 0.07-0.32). Table 1 provides ICCs for each vertebral body.

Table 1. Inter-reader and intra-reader ICCs for each vertebral body.

Inter-reader Reliability

Intra-reader  Reliability

Inter-reader Reliability

Intra-reader Reliability

T6

0.64 (0.39-0.80)

0.83 (0.70-0.90)

T12

0.76 (0.60-0.86)

0.96 (0.93-0.98)

T7

0.58 (0.33-0.75)

0.92 (0.86-0.96)

L1

0.85 (0.75-0.91)

0.97 (0.94-0.98)

T8

0.39 (0.11-0.62)

0.75 (0.59-0.85)

L2

0.91 (0.84-0.95)

0.97 (0.95-0.98)

T9

0.57 (0.32-0.75)

0.94 (0.89-0.97)

L3

0.91 (0.84-0.94)

0.99 (0.98-0.99)

T10

0.49 (0.23-0.69)

0.95 (0.91-0.97)

L4

0.81 (0.67-0.89)

0.98 (0.96-0.99)

T11

0.77 (0.55-0.89)

0.98 (0.94-0.99)

L5

0.79 (0.65-0.88)

0.96 (0.93-0.98)

Table 1: ICC (95% CI) measurements per vertebral body.
Conclusion: MR DWI is overall a reproducible imaging sequence performed in the sagittal plane. The reproducibility is better in the lumbar spine compared to lower thoracic spine. Pedicles and spinous proceses are not reliably imaged by DWI.
References: Gaspersic et al. Skeletal Radiol. 2008;37:123-31. Koh et al. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:1622-35


Disclosure:

J. M. Møller,
None;

I. J. Sorensen,
None;

M. Ostergaard,
None;

H. Thomsen,
None;

O. R. Madsen,
None;

S. J. Pedersen,

AbbVie,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/reproducibility-of-magnetic-resonance-imaging-diffusion-weighted-imaging-in-axial-spondyloarthritis-patients-and-healthy-subjects/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology