ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1974

Incidence of Atypical Femur Fractures Associated with Bisphosphonate Use for Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review of the Literature

John N. Mecchella1, John A. Batsis2, Robin J. Larson3 and Gautham Suresh4, 1Rheumatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 2General Internal Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, 3The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, NH, 4Neonatology, Pediatrics, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Bisphosphonates, fractures and osteoporosis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoporosis and Metabolic Bone Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Reports of a link between bisphosphonate use in patients with osteoporosis and atypical femoral fractures–those occurring in subtrochanteric or diaphyseal locations–have generated significant concern among patients and providers.  Attempts to estimate the degree of increased risk have varied widely with OR’s ranging from 1 to 46.  In addition, clinicians and patients may be overestimating the absolute risk of atypical fracture when considering these highly effective drugs.  To obtain better estimates of these rates and assist clinicians in determining the risk versus benefits, we systematically identified and summarized studies reporting rates of atypical femoral fractures in subjects receiving bisphosphonates for osteoporosis. 

Methods:

With assistance of a reference librarian, we searched MEDLINE (1948-2012), and the Cochrane Library (2012) for studies that reported incidence of atypical femoral fractures among subjects exposed to bisphosphonates for osteoporosis.  We also reviewed reference lists and consulted with experts.  We excluded studies evaluating bisphosphonates in malignancy.  We used no language restrictions.  Two reviewers independently extracted data.  Disagreements were resolved through consensus.  Fracture rates were summarized according to study characteristics.

Results:

Of 257 initial studies identified, 12 met all inclusion criteria and included three randomized controlled trials, six retrospective cohorts, and three population-based case-control studies.  Among a total of 205,466 subjects followed over a range of less than 1 to 10 years of bisphosphonate exposure, there were 1440 subtrochanteric or diaphyseal fractures identified by ICD-9 or 10 coding, of which 160 were also confirmed radiographically.  The incidence of atypical femoral fractures per 1000 patient-years of treatment with a bisphosphonate for osteoporosis ranged from 0.02 to 1 in studies that required radiographic verification of atypical nature, 0.23 to 3.4 in observational studies or randomized controlled trials, and 1.55 to 3.4 in studies of secondary prevention.   

Conclusion:

Currently available evidence suggests the incidence of atypical femoral fractures among patients receiving bisphosphonates for osteoporosis is low.  In addition, even at the highest reported estimate of 3.4 per 1000 patient-years, the rate is considerably lower than estimates for recurrent osteoporotic fractures, which occur at approximately 100 per 1,000 patients per year.  Discussions regarding bisphosphonate therapy should put both benefits and harms in appropriate context so that decisions are driven by evidence, not fear.


Disclosure:

J. N. Mecchella,
None;

J. A. Batsis,
None;

R. J. Larson,
None;

G. Suresh,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/incidence-of-atypical-femur-fractures-associated-with-bisphosphonate-use-for-osteoporosis-a-systematic-review-of-the-literature/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology