ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1528

Efficacy and Safety of MK-8457, a Novel SYK Inhibitor for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Two Randomized, Controlled, Phase 2 Studies

Ronald van Vollenhoven1, S. B. Cohen2, Philip J. Mease3, Charles G. Peterfy4, Wolfgang Spieler5, Judith Boice6, Sean Curtis7, Qing Li7, Ruji Yao8, Richard Baumgartner7 and Holly Weng8, 1Unit for Clinical Therapy Research, Inflammatory Diseases (ClinTRID), The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Metroplex Clinical Research Center, Dallas, TX, 3University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 4Spire Sciences LLC, Boca Raton, FL, 5Osteologie und Rheumatologie, ZeFOR GmbH Zentrum für Forschung, Zerbst, Germany, 6Merck Research Laboratories, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 7Merck & Co., Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ, 8Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: anti-TNF therapy, methotrexate (MTX), rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and syk

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Novel therapies, Biosimilars, Strategies and Mechanisms in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Novel, targeted small-molecular medications are needed in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA).  MK-8457 is a novel inhibitor of spleen tyrosine kinase (SYK) and zeta-chain-associated protein kinase 70 (ZAP70) that is being investigated as an RA treatment.

Methods:   Two Phase 2, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were conducted in RA subjects (≥ 18 years old) .  Study 1 was an adaptive study in subjects with active RA despite treatment with methotrexate (MTX) and included MRI; Study 2 included subjects with active RA and an inadequate response or intolerance to anti-TNF-α therapy.  Subjects in both studies were randomized to MK-8457 100 mg BID + MTX or placebo + MTX for 24 weeks, this dose has 99% inhibition of basophil CD63 biomarker. The primary endpoints were the American College of Rheumatology 20 (ACR20) response at Week 12 in Study 1 and change from baseline in the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) based on C-reactive protein (CRP) at Week 12 in Study 2.  ACR 50 and ACR70 were also evaluated.  Subjects were eligible to continue open-label safety extensions for up to 100 weeks upon completion of the initial 24-week treatment period.  Safety was monitored by physical examination, vital signs, safety labs, and adverse event (AE) reporting. 

Results:   Both studies were discontinued early due to serious infections.  At the time of study discontinuation, there were 82 subjects (mean age 55 years; 77% female; baseline mean DAS28CRP 5.98) randomized to MK-8457 (n=41) and placebo (n=41) in Study 1.  In Study 2, 56 subjects (mean age 59 years; 77% female; baseline mean DAS28CRP 6.12) were randomized to MK-8457 (n=30) and placebo (n=26).  Statistically significant efficacy improvement was observed with MK-8457 in Study 1 (MTX-IR), but not in Study 2 (TNF-IR) (Table).  Study 1 also showed efficacy on osteitis and synovitis on MRI.  At termination, Study 2 only had 31 subjects with Week 12 data; therefore, there was little power to assess efficacy endpoints.  There were 27% (MK-8457) vs 10% (placebo) with non-infection gastrointestinal (GI) AEs in Study 1, and; 27% (MK-8457) vs 4% (placebo) with GI AEs in Study 2.    In Studies 1 and 2, there were 6 serious respiratory infections (5 pneumonia and 1 bronchitis) and 1 serious case of enterocolitis; 1 subject with presumed opportunistic infection died during the Study 1 extension.  The combined serious infection rate per 100 patient-years was 16.3.  There were no significant changes in blood pressure in the MK-8547 treated groups.  

Conclusion:   MK-8457 improved efficacy in subjects with an inadequate response to MTX (Study 1), but not in subjects who failed anti-TNF-α therapy (Study 2), although Study 2 was limited to a small sample size.  A high rate of serious infections was observed leading to the termination of both studies suggesting a potential increased infection risk with high degree of SYK and/or ZAP70 inhibition.

Table:  Efficacy Endpoints at Week 12

Study 1 (MTX-IR)

Study 2 (TNF-IR)

Placebo

MK-8457

Placebo

MK-8457

Key Endpoints

ACR20 (%)†

24.4%; n=41

68.3%**; n=41

26.9%;  n=26

26.7%;  n=30

ACR50 (%)

4.9%; n=41

36.6%**; n=41

11.5%;  n=26

20%;  n=30

ACR70 (%)

4.9%; n=41

19.5%*; n=41

7.7%;  n=26

13.3%;  n=30

DAS28CRP ‡
(LS Mean[95% CI])

-0.87(-1.23,-0.51);

n=39

-1.98 (-2.34,-1.61)**;

n=37

-1.31 (-2.01, -0.62);

n=18

-1.83 (-2.58, -1.09);

n=13

Mean (SD) 12-Week MRI Scores (Change from Baseline)

Osteitis

2.12 (7.8); n=12

-3.29 ( 4.43 )*; n=9

N/A

N/A

Synovitis

1.08 ( 3.02 ); n=12  

-1.71 ( 2.54 )*; n=9

N/A

N/A

Erosion

1.08 ( 2.29 ); n=12  

0.03 ( 1.19 ); n=9  

N/A

N/A

*p<0.05 vs. placebo; **p<0.001 vs. placebo

†Primary endpoint (Study 1); ‡Primary endpoint (Study 2)

N/A = Not applicable (MRI data not collected in Study 2)


Disclosure:

R. van Vollenhoven,

AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Glaxo Smith Kline, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

2,

AbbVie, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

5;

S. B. Cohen,

Amgen, Biogen-IDEC, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Centocor, Genentech, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Merck, and Roche,

5;

P. J. Mease,

AbbVie, Amgen, Bioden-IDEC, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

5,

AbbVie, Amgen, Bioden-IDEC, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

2,

AbbVie, Amgen, Bioden-IDEC, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Covagen, Crescendo, Genentech, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, and Vertex,

8;

C. G. Peterfy,

Spire Sciences In.,,

1,

AbbVie, Inc., Amgen Inc., Articulinx, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Five Prime Therapeutics, Genentech, Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc., Lilly USA, LLC., Medimmune, Merck Pharmaceuticals, Moximed, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk, Plexxikon,

5,

Amgen,

8;

W. Spieler,
None;

J. Boice,

Merck Human Health,

3;

S. Curtis,

Merck ,

3;

Q. Li,

Merck ,

1;

R. Yao,

Merck ,

3;

R. Baumgartner,

Merck ,

3;

H. Weng,

Merck ,

3.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-mk-8457-a-novel-syk-inhibitor-for-the-treatment-of-rheumatoid-arthritis-in-two-randomized-controlled-phase-2-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology