ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1571

Musculoskeletal Complaints and Psoriatic Arthritis in Primary Care Patients with Psoriasis

M.C. Karreman1, A.E.a.M. Weel1,2, M. van der Ven1, M. Vis3, I. Tchetverikov4, T.E.C. Nijsten5, J.M.W. Hazes1 and J.J. Luime1, 1Rheumatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2Department of Rheumatology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 4Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 5Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Primary care and psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Spondyloarthropathies and Psoriatic Arthritis - Clinical Aspects and Treatment II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Musculoskeletal complaints(MSC) account for about 10% of the General Practitioner (GP) consultations1, in a small percentage the underlying disease is psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Evidence suggests that when a psoriasis patient visits the GP with MSCs, GP’s don’t always link the existing psoriasis with the MSC limiting early referral of PsA. This may be explained by the limited  knowledge about the frequency of MSC and PsA in psoriasis patients in primary care.2,3

Our objective was to estimate the prevalence of MSC and PsA in primary care patients with psoriasis.

 

Methods

We conducted a cross-sectional study in adult primary care patients with psoriasis. Patients were identified from GP records by ICPC code S91 for psoriasis. Responding patients reporting pain in joints, entheses or the lower back were checked on eligibility by a telephone interview and invited for clinical evaluation. Ultrasonoghraphy (US) of the enthesis was performed if a patient had at least one tender enthesis (LEI/MASES) by an independent trained examiner. Patients were referred to a rheumatologist if clinical evaluation suggested the presence of arthritis or axial disease or ultrasonography of the enthesis showed positive Power Doppler(PD) signal. A PsA case was defined by opinion of the rheumatologist or fulfilling the CASPAR criteria with PD signal in an enthesis on US.

 

Results

649 psoriasis (PsO) patients from 97 GPs were invited (Table 1). Of the 1722 responders (65.0 %),  890(51.7%) were willing to participate of which 672 (75.5%) reported MSC at the telephone interview (TI) and 527 were clinically evaluated. 145 out of the 672 patients dropped out between TI and the visit, mostly without giving any reason. The 832 patients that did not want to participate reported MSC in  19.7% (n=164) on the reply slip.

Among the 527 patients we found 54 new cases of PsA(10.2%): inflammatory arthritis (n=11), axial disease (n=3), enthesitis (n=37; confirmed by US) and a combination of symptoms(n=3). Another 62 existing PsA patients were identified. This led to a prevalence of 6.7% among PsO patients that responded (n=1722) and 4.4% among all invited PsO patients (n=2649) assuming no additional cases in the non-responders (Table 2).

 

Conclusion

Among psoriasis patients with musculoskeletal complaints in primary care (n=836)  the prevalence of PsA is estimated to be 13.8% (95%CI 11.6%-16.2%), which would decrease to 4.4%  (95% CI 3.7%-5.2%) among all PsO patients if no additional cases would be observed in the non-responders.  Besides 54 of the 116 cases (46.6%) hadn’t been diagnosed before our study, this indicates underdiagnosis of PsA in primary care.

 



Disclosure:

M. C. Karreman,
None;

A. E. A. M. Weel,
None;

M. van der Ven,
None;

M. Vis,
None;

I. Tchetverikov,
None;

T. E. C. Nijsten,
None;

J. M. W. Hazes,
None;

J. J. Luime,

Pfizer bv,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/musculoskeletal-complaints-and-psoriatic-arthritis-in-primary-care-patients-with-psoriasis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology