ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1937

Model Examining Factors Related to Physicians’ Ratings of Disease Activity in Patients with RA

Julia R. Ayeroff1, Sarah R. Ormseth2, David Hardy3, Michael R. Irwin2, Michael H. Weisman4 and Perry M. Nicassio2, 1Postbaccalaureate Premedical Program, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, 2Cousins Center for PNI, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 3Psychology, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, 4Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disease Activity, health disparities, psychosocial factors and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Disparities/Social Determinants of Health

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine a multidimensional, integrated model describing the interrelations among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) objective disease activity, patient-rated disease activity, tender joint count, and related psychosocial factors as determinants of physician-rated disease activity (see Figure 1). It was expected that objective disease activity would be positively associated with physician-rated disease activity, both directly and indirectly through the hypothesized mediators of patient-rated disease activity and tender joint count. Methods:  The data of 105 participants satisfying the ACR classification criteria for RA were drawn from baseline of a randomized comparative efficacy trial of psychosocial interventions for RA. In the hypothesized model, objective disease activity (DAS-28 Swollen Joint Count and ESR), patient-rated disease activity (Rapid Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatology total joint score and disease activity VAS), physician-rated joint tenderness score serve as determinants of physician-rated disease activity. EQS 6.1 was used to evaluate the structural model, and the significance of estimated indirect effects (calculated based on the Sobel method) was taken as evidence of mediation. Results: The hypothesized model fit the data well, χ2(28)= 21.97, p = .079, CFI = 0.96, RMSEA = 0.07, and the specified predictors explained 84% of the variance in physician-rated disease activity (see Figure 1). Greater objective disease activity directly predicted physician-rated disease activity and contributed to higher levels of patient-rated disease activity, which, in turn, predicted a higher tender joint count which ultimately exerted a strong positive effect on physician-rated disease activity. While objective disease activity had a strong direct effect on physician-rated disease activity, partial mediation was established because the strength of this association diminished when the model included the hypothesized predictors (as evidenced by its significant indirect effect; βindirect = .24, p < .001). With regard to patients' self-ratings of RA symptoms, depressive symptomatology and non-white ethnicity were shown as positively associated with higher self-perceived levels of disease activity. In contrast, non-white ethnicity was associated with significantly lower physician-rated tender joint scores. Conclusion:  Findings confirmed the importance of a multi-dimensional framework in evaluating RA disease activity and elucidated the mechanisms that perpetuate health disparities. These results identify a specific point in the clinical encounter where an increased awareness of patients’ experiences of their disease can contribute to more accurate ratings and improved outcomes.

Slide04.jpg

 


Disclosure:

J. R. Ayeroff,
None;

S. R. Ormseth,
None;

D. Hardy,
None;

M. R. Irwin,
None;

M. H. Weisman,
None;

P. M. Nicassio,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/model-examining-factors-related-to-physicians-ratings-of-disease-activity-in-patients-with-ra/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology