ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2046

Perceived Discrimination in Individuals with Radiographic Knee and Hip Osteoarthritis

Rebecca J. Cleveland1, Jordan B. Renner2, Joanne M. Jordan3 and Leigh F. Callahan4, 1Thurston Arthritis Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, 2University of North Carolina Department of Radiology, Chapel Hill, NC, 3University of North Carolina Dept of Epidemiology, Chapel Hill, NC, 4Thurston Arthritis Res Ctr, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Disability, osteoarthritis and race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Epidemiology and Public Health (ARHP)

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose

To describe the characteristics of participants who reported feelings of discrimination among a cohort of participants with radiographic osteoarthritis (rOA) of the knee and/or hip in the Johnston County Osteoarthritis Project (JoCo).

Methods

A cross-sectional analysis was carried out on 766 individuals with rOA who were assessed in the second follow-up evaluation (2006-2010) of JoCo. rOA was defined as Kellgren-Lawrence grade ≥ 2 in at least one knee or one hip. Any perceived discrimination was assessed using a validated measure asking “how often have you been treated with less courtesy or less respect than other people?” Responses were assessed on a likert scale ranging from 1 to 4 (1=never, 2=occasionally, 3=frequently, 4=always). If indicating any discrimination, follow-up questions asked for the more specific reasons for discrimination such as gender, age, race, disability, education, religion and body size (yes or no). Descriptive characteristics were assessed and Chi-square statistics were performed to examine whether a participant perceived any type of discrimination, and if so, the specific reason for the discrimination. Additionally, we assessed discrimination according to whether an individual had knee or hip rOA, and according to demographic characteristics.

Results

Participants were on average 68 years old, mostly women (67.7%), African American (30.5%), and had a mean BMI of 31.5. There were 520 participants with knee rOA and 473 with hip rOA. Thirty-nine percent of participants reported feeling discrimination at least occasionally (36.7% occasionally, 2.5% frequently, 0.3% always). The most commonly reported reason for perceived discrimination was disability (20.5%) followed by age (10.9%) and race (10.6%). Those with hip rOA reported any discrimination more often than those with knee rOA (40.6% vs. 36.5%) (Table 1.). Any perceived discrimination tended to be reported more often among those who were male and younger than age 67 and lived in areas with less poverty. Age discrimination was reported more often among those who lived in higher poverty areas (p<0.01) while those who reported discrimination for religion lived in lower poverty areas (p=0.01). African Americans reported discrimination for skin color more often than whites (p<0.01) and racial discrimination was reported more frequently among men (p<0.01).

Conclusion

Perceived discrimination is frequently reported in people with knee and/or hip rOA in this racially diverse population in North Carolina, with disability being the most commonly reported reason. Discrimination is also associated with several demographic characteristics that could have an important impact on rOA outcomes.


Disclosure:

R. J. Cleveland,
None;

J. B. Renner,
None;

J. M. Jordan,

Algynomics,

5,

Samumed,

5,

Flexion,

5,

ClearView Healthcare Partners,

5,

Trinity Partners, LLC,

5;

L. F. Callahan,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/perceived-discrimination-in-individuals-with-radiographic-knee-and-hip-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology