ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2049

Improving Pneumococcal Vaccination and Documentation for Immunosuppressed Patients At a University-Based Rheumatology Clinic

Christine Peoples1, Rohit Aggarwal1, Heena Sheth2, Aarat Patel3, Daniel Lupash4, Christine McBurney1, Ashima Malik1, Swati Modi1, Ximena D. Ruiz5 and Douglas W. Lienesch1, 1Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 2Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 3Adult/Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 4Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 5Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Quality of care and vaccines

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Innovations in Practice Management and Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines recommend that all immunosuppressed patients receive the pneumococcal vaccine. The American College of Rheumatology Task Force Panel recommends vaccination for patients initiating therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or biologic therapies. Patients with chronic rheumatologic conditions have approximately double the incidence of infection compared to the normal population and those taking immunosuppressive agents show the highest risk, with the majority involving respiratory tract infections by common pathogens including S. pneumoniae. Prior studies show the rate of pneumococcal vaccination is low in this population. The aim of this study was to improve both administration and documentation rates of pneumococcal vaccine in immunosuppressed patients taking DMARDs and/or biologic agents at a university-based rheumatology clinic. 

Methods: This study is a pre- and post-intervention comparison. Intervention phase data was collected from 1/23/2012 – 6/15/2012. Pre-intervention data included patients seen between 1/1/2009 – 12/31/2010 that were prescribed an immunosuppressive medication. Regularly seen patients were defined as having at least 2 visits, with either 1) at least 1 visit within the first 12 months of the measurement period and at least 1 visit within the second 12 months, or 2) 2 visits within only the second 12 month measurement period, with the first and last visits being separated by a minimum of 90 days. Patients eligible for pneumococcal vaccine and patients who were up-to-date with pneumococcal vaccination were determined. For the intervention phase, a report was generated of patients on immunosuppressant medications who had not received the pneumococcal vaccine who had upcoming visits. Clinic staff flagged these patients and a pneumococcal vaccine information sheet along with a brief form for the patient to complete were given to the patient. The medical assistant (MA) gathered information and documented in the electronic record. The MA communicated to RN who ordered and administered the vaccine. In select cases, physician approval and order were required prior to vaccination.

Results: Baseline data included 968 patients. Only 148 (15.3%) patients had received the pneumococcal vaccine. Post-intervention pneumococcal vaccination compliance revealed 361/1044 (34.6%) of patients had received the vaccine. This was a significant improvement from baseline (p<0.0001). An additional 114 (10.9%) patients were offered vaccination but had either already received the vaccine or deferred. A total of 45.5% had documentation, which was also significant improvement from baseline of 15.8% (p<0.0001).

Conclusion: Pneumonia vaccination administration rates in immunosuppressed patients with rheumatologic diseases are low and do not meet published guidelines. Implementation of an e-record and ancillary-staff-based intervention significantly improved vaccination and documentations rates without the need for considerable physician input. Ancillary staff review and physician communication were the key components in improving compliance with vaccination.


Disclosure:

C. Peoples,
None;

R. Aggarwal,
None;

H. Sheth,
None;

A. Patel,
None;

D. Lupash,
None;

C. McBurney,
None;

A. Malik,
None;

S. Modi,
None;

X. D. Ruiz,
None;

D. W. Lienesch,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/improving-pneumococcal-vaccination-and-documentation-for-immunosuppressed-patients-at-a-university-based-rheumatology-clinic/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology