ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2242

Effects of Intraarticular (IA) Corticosteroid Injections on Bone Markers and Endogenous Cortisol in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis (OA): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled Trial

Muhammad Imran1, Aruna Baratham2, Jo Wick3, Barbara Lukert4 and Herbert Lindsley5, 1Rheumatology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS, 2Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Private Community Practice, Kansas city, KS, 3Biostatistics, Kansas University Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS, 4Internal Medicine, Kansas University Medical Center, kansas city, KS, 5Rheumatology, Kansas University Med Ctr, Kansas City, KS

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Osteoarthritis and steroids

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Osteoarthritis - Clinical Aspects: Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: IA steroids are used to treat knee OA. Little is known about the systemic effect of intraarticular steroid injections on bone or the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal axis (HPA). 

Methods:   We describe a 2:2:1 randomized, double blind, placebo controlled study. 25 subjects (20 females, 5 males) with knee OA, age range 45–83 years were identified from our clinical practice. Ten subjects (Group 1) were injected with Depo-methylprednisolone 80 mg plus lidocaine 20 mg, 10 additional subjects (Group 2) were injected with Depo-methylprednisolone 16 mg plus lidocaine 20 mg and 5 subjects (Group 3) were given normal saline with lidocaine 20 mg. Blood draws were performed 5 times (Days 0, 2–3, 7, 14 and 28). Means and 95% CI were reported by time and group.  All plots show mean (+/- SEM). Between and within-group comparison p-values were generated by t-tests.  All parametric assumptions were verified.

Results: Mean levels of serum osteocalcin, a bone formation marker, reached a nadir (10.2 ng/ml (95% CI 9.3-11.2) from baseline of 15.5 ng/ml (95% CI 14.4-16.7) by Days 2–3 with recovery by Day 7 (14.9 ng/ml (95% CI 13.8-16.1)) after IA corticosteroids only for Group 1, with mean change of 5.3 ng/ml (95% CI 2.4-8.2) (p = 0.01). No change was seen in Groups 2, 3 (Fig 1, p> 0.05). In contrast, the bone catabolic marker Tartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase Form 5b (TRACP-5b) showed no consistent change for any of the three groups over 28 days (range 1.7–2.7 U/L) (Fig 2). Mean baseline endogenous cortisol level reached a nadir by Days 2-3 for Group 1 (8.9 mcg/mL (95% CI 8.0-9.8)) and by Day 7 for Group 2 (8.9 mcg/ml (95% CI 8.0-9.7).  Both returned at least to baseline by day 14. Baseline vitamin D levels did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05), though Group 1 levels were not as low (range 22–47 ng/mL) as Group 2 (range 8.3–51.5 ng/mL) or Group 3 (range 8.6–38.5 ng/mL). In control subjects, lower baseline levels of vitamin D were associated with greater decreases in osteocalcin at Day 2 – 3 (r = 0.9, p < 0.05).  Low levels of vitamin D were associated with greater levels of suppression of osteocalcin at Day 7 in Group 2 (r = -0.7, p = 0.03). 

Conclusion:  IA corticosteroids have a transient adverse effect on bone formation with significant recovery of osteocalcin levels by one week and no change in bone catabolism. Cortisol levels decrease slightly at one week of IA administration and rebound above baseline by two weeks. In contrast to daily oral corticosteroids, single doses of IA steroids have no persistent adverse effect on bone or the HPA axis.


Disclosure:

M. Imran,
None;

A. Baratham,
None;

J. Wick,
None;

B. Lukert,
None;

H. Lindsley,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effects-of-intraarticular-ia-corticosteroid-injections-on-bone-markers-and-endogenous-cortisol-in-patients-with-knee-osteoarthritis-oa-a-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology