ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2312

Use of Physician Extenders to Improve Quality and Efficiency of Clinical Visits

Carl Orr1, Francis Young1, Lorraine O' Neill1, Mairead Murray1, Phil Gallagher2 and Douglas J. Veale3, 1Rheumatology, Dublin Academic Medical Centre, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 2Rheumatology, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland, 3Translational Rheumatology Research Group, St. Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin 4, Ireland

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Efficient and management

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Quality Measures and Quality of Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

Logistical difficulties associated with managing a large, publically funded secondary service, means that service delivery is costly in terms of physician time. Patients frequently do not have medication lists with them when they attend clinic. Recent results are not available to the physician at the time of clinic visit. Disease activity scores to assist in informing clinical decisions with a treat-to-target approach, are not calculated. Patient reported outcome measures (PROM) are rarely formally assessed and recorded, because these too are often time consuming.

Physician Extenders (PE) have been used to improve efficiency in out-patient clinics.(1) In this action-research endeavour(2), we introduced changes both to the structure and process of how return patients are assessed, making use of a PE to prepare for patient visits.

The specific aims were:

  1. To decrease the time physicians spend with inflammatory arthropathy (IA) return patients.
  2. To perform a standardised and validated measurement of disease activity for all patients.
  3. To increase the proportion of patients acquiring staging hands and feet plain film radiographs every two years in compliance with the consensus of rheumatologists at the hospital.

Methods:

The PE recorded the results of the last inflammatory markers and plain film radiographs of hands and feet in a pro-forma. Where these results were not recent (2 weeks for blood results and 2 years for radiographs), the PE liaised with a physician, on a scheduled basis, to arrange for the latter to complete the required ordering forms.

The PE assembled and mailed the pro-forma and ordering forms to returning IA patients 2 weeks in advance of their clinic visit. The pro-forma included a patient global assessment; other PROMs, e.g. HAQ-DI, SF-36; as well as an accurate current medication list. Patients were asked to complete the pro-forma, and to have the bloods and radiographs taken a few days before their appointment.

Patients presented to clinic with a self-completed pro-forma as well up to date results.

Results:

125 patients (85 female) with IA were sent pro-formas before their clinic visit.

Mean time a physician spent at clinic per patient was decreased from 23 minutes to 15 minutes.

120 (96.0%), patients had DAS28-CRP scores calculated, 5 (4%) did not have scores calculated because of a piece of missing data.

68/125 (54.4%) had no radiographs in the three 3 years before their clinic visit. Of the 68 who had no radiographs taken during this time, 49 (72.1%) had radiographs directly as a result of this action-research.

Conclusion:

The use of a PE in preparation for clinic visits decreases the time physicians need to spend reviewing patients, and increases the quality of the visit as measured by the collection of DAS scores, and PROMs, and relevant radiological investigations. A cost analysis needs to be done to demonstrate that this approach is cost effective.

1.            Norris B, Harris T, Stringer S. Effective use of physician extenders in an outpatient otolaryngology setting. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(11):2317-21.

2.            Coghlan D, Brannick T. Doing action research in your own organization: Sage; 2014.


Disclosure:

C. Orr,
None;

F. Young,
None;

L. O’ Neill,
None;

M. Murray,
None;

P. Gallagher,
None;

D. J. Veale,

Abbvie,

2,

MSD,

2,

Pfizer Inc,

2,

Roche ,

2,

Pfizer ,

5,

Roche ,

5,

Abbott,

8,

MSD,

8,

Pfizer,

8,

Roche ,

8.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-physician-extenders-to-improve-quality-and-efficiency-of-clinical-visits/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology