ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2368

Impact of Physicians’ Adherence to Treat-to-Target Strategy on Outcomes in Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Laura Kuusalo1, Kari Puolakka2, Hannu Kautiainen3, Marjatta Leirisalo-Repo4 and Vappu Rantalaiho5, 1Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland, 2Department of Medicine, South Karelia Central Hospital, Lappeenranta, Finland, 3Medcare Oy, Äänekoski, Finland, 4Department of Medicine, Division Of Rheumatology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, 5Department of Internal Medicine, Centre for Rheumatic Diseases,, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Compliance, DMARDs, Early Rheumatoid Arthritis, physician data and remission

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

We have previously shown that in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) remission targeted, intensive combination treatment, regardless of initial infliximab, results in remission in most patients. Still, patients’ adherence to medication in RA is often poor and difficult to improve. Little attention, however, has been focused on the effect of physicians’ adherence.

Methods

In the Neo-RACo study 99 patients with early, active RA were treated with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine and low-dose prednisolone for 2 years. Patients were randomized to receive either infliximab or placebo for 6 months from week 4. All swollen joints had to be injected with intra-articular glucocorticoids. After 2 years, medication could be tapered down in the case of remission. In non-remission, treatments were unrestricted, including the use of biologics. At all times, treatment aimed at strict Neo-RACo remission defined as no swollen or tender joints and presence of 5 out of the 6 following criteria: morning stiffness <15 minutes; no fatigue; no joint pain; no tender joints; no swelling in joints or tendons; and ESR <30 mm/h in women and <20 mm/h in men. During a 5-year follow-up, strict remission rates, disease activity score 28 (DAS28) levels, radiological changes, anti-rheumatic medication after 2 years, and cumulative days off work were assessed. Physicians’ (n=30) adherence during 15 study visits between 0 and 24 months was evaluated with a scoring system. On every visit, lack of glucocorticoid injections (0.2–0.4 points), lack of medication adjustments (0.4 points), and poor filling of the study forms (0.2 points) were assessed. Also, 0.5–1.0 points were given if a study visit was cancelled. The patients were divided into tertiles by the sum of the points for inactivity between 0 and 24 months. Factors contributing to remission rates at 3 and 24 months were evaluated. 

Results

Follow-up data were available on 93 patients. Mean of the sum of the points for inactivity was higher in the placebo group (2.67±2.25) than in the infliximab group (2.09±1.71, p=0.032). Physicians’ adherence (p<0.001), duration of symptoms (p=0.037) and the use of infliximab (p=0.016) predicted strict remissions in a multivariable model at 3 months, whereas at 24 months physicians’ adherence (p<0.001) was the sole independent predictor. We found a relationship favoring active treatment on strict Neo-RACo remission rates, which were 77.4%, 62.7% and 46.7% (p=0.018) in the actively treated, the intermediately treated, and the inactively treated at 2 years. The respective figures at 3 years were 80.0%, 56.3% and 53.3% (p=0.048), at 4 years 73.3%, 75.0% and 41.4% (p=0.025), and at 5 years 63.6%, 65.6% and 51.7% (p=0.40). In addition, the DAS28 levels were lower in the actively treated than in the intermediately and the inactively treated at all time points. There were no significant differences in radiological progression and cumulative days off work between tertiles of treatment activity. After the first 24 months, biologics were used more often among the inactively treated compared with the intermediately and the actively treated (p=0.024).

Conclusion

Physicians’ active stance is crucial for the targeted treatment of RA to work.


Disclosure:

L. Kuusalo,
None;

K. Puolakka,

Abbvie inc, BMS, Pfizer inc, MSD, Roche, UCB,

5;

H. Kautiainen,

Abbvie inc, Pfizer inc,

5;

M. Leirisalo-Repo,

MSD Finland,

5;

V. Rantalaiho,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/impact-of-physicians-adherence-to-treat-to-target-strategy-on-outcomes-in-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology