ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2375

Should Physician Reduce patients’ Glucocorticoids to Offset the Risk of Serious Infection Event Among RA Patients Who Switched from Non-Biologic Dmards and Glucocorticoid to Biologics?

Huifeng Yun1, Lang Chen2, George W. Reed3, Joel M. Kremer4, Jeffrey D. Greenberg5 and Jeffrey R. Curtis6, 1Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, 2Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Corrona, LLC., Southborough, MA, 4Medicine, Albany Medical College and the Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY, 5Rheumatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 6University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologics, glucocorticoids, infection and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects (ACR): Impact of Various Interventions and Therapeutic Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  Glucocorticoids (GCs) and biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have previously been associated with serious infection events (SIEs) among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. For patients on non-biologic DMARDs (nbDMARD) and GCs, , it is unclear whether any increased risk for SIEs associated with adding a biologic might be offset if patients are able to reduce their GC exposure.

Methods: Using 2002-2013 Corrona RA registry data contributed by U.S rheumatologists and their RA patients, we identified eligible index visits where patients were on a nbDMARD and GCs, but not on biologics. Biologic DMARDs include etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, infliximab, abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab. Patients with psoriasis arthritis and malignancy were excluded. Follow up started at this time (i.e. index date), and ended at the earliest date of: a hospitalized infection, a visit when patient was on nbDMARDs only without GC, GCs without nbDMARD or no RA treatment, death, an 18-month gap between CORRONA visits, or 6/30/13. As a time-varying exposure, we categorized each person day into the following five exposure categories:  nbDMARDs + GC (prednisone <5mg/day), nbDMARDs + GC (≥5mg/day), biologic DMARD + GC (<5mg/day), biologic DMARDs + GC (≥5mg/day), and biologic DMARD without GCs. Biologic exposure could have included concomitant nbDMARD use. At each visit, physicians reported the occurrence of SIEs. Events were confirmed in two stages, both by reporting physicians and with medical records. We calculated the incidence rate of SIEs for each exposure and compared risks using Cox regression adjusting for age, gender and clinical disease activity index (CDAI) at the index date.

Results: Of 12,851 eligible index visits where patients initiated nbDMARDs and GCs, 23% were with GC <5mg/day and 77% with GC ≥5mg. For patients were treated with nbDMARDs and GCs <5mg/day at the start of follow-up, 14.4% subsequently initiated biologics. For these individuals, 45.9% were able to discontinue GCs, 32.6% were on GC <5mg/day and 12.5 were on GC ≥5mg at the end of follow-up. Of 1,779 (20%) patients starting on nbDMARDs and GCs ≥5mg and then initiated biologics, 41.7% were able to discontinue glucocorticoids, and 9.8% were able to reduce GC dose to < 5mg by end of follow-up. After excluding 7% of SIEs that could not be confirmed, we identified 293SIEs yielding an incidence rate for SIEs of 1.8 per 100 person years across all exposures. After adjustment and compared to exposure of nbDMARDs + GCs (≥5mg/day), patients on biologic DMARDs without steroid use were less likely to have a SIE (Table). Both age and CDAI at the index date were positively associated with SIEs (not shown).

Conclusion: Many RA patients treated with nbDMARDs and glucocorticoids who initiate biologics are subsequently able to discontinue glucocorticoids. These individuals are at reduced risk for serious infections.

 

Table : Events, absolute incidence rate and adjusted hazard ratio of serious infections by DMARD, biologic, and glucocorticoid exposure

Biologic Exposures

Events

Incidence rate per 100 person years

Adjusted Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

nbDMARDs + GCs (≥5mg/day)

162

2.10

1.0 (referent)

Biologic DMARDs + GCs  (≥5mg/day)

47

2.71

1.34 (0.94-1.91)

nbDMARDs + GCs(<5mg/day)

55

1.63

0.79 (0.58-1.08)

Biologic DMARDs + GCs (<5mg/day)

12

1.56

0.76 (0.41-1.40)

Biologic DMARDs without GC

17

0.75

0.41 (0.24-0.70)

* Adjusted for age, gender and CDAI at the index date  
DMARD = disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

NbDMARDs = non biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

GC = glucocorticoid; CI = confidence interval;

 



Disclosure:

H. Yun,

Amgen,

2;

L. Chen,
None;

G. W. Reed,

Corrona, LLC.,

3;

J. M. Kremer,
None;

J. D. Greenberg,

Corrona, LLC.,

1,

Corrona, LLC.,

3,

AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis and Pfizer,

5;

J. R. Curtis,

Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche, Genentech, UCB Pharma, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/should-physician-reduce-patients-glucocorticoids-to-offset-the-risk-of-serious-infection-event-among-ra-patients-who-switched-from-non-biologic-dmards-and-glucocorticoid-to-biologics/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology