ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2482

Use of Biologic Therapy As Monotherapy in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

Antonio Gómez-Centeno1, Olga Martínez2, Francisco Javier Ballina3, José Manuel Rodríguez4, Jenaro Graña5, Manuel Brito6, Juana Sampedro7, Gerardo Iglesias8, Concepción Delgado9 and Indalecio Monteagudo10, 1Hospital Parc Taulí, Sabadell, Spain, 2Hospital Virgen de la Concha, Zamora, Spain, 3Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain, 4Hospital Getafe, Getafe, Spain, 5Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain, 6Hospital Nuestra Señora Candelaria, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain, 7Hospital Virgen de la Salud, Toledo, Spain, 8Complejo Hospitalario Palencia, Palencia, Spain, 9Hospital Clínico Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain, 10Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic drugs

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Therapeutic Strategies, Biomarkers and Predictors of Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

The treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) is based on synthetic or biological disease-modifying drugs (DMARDs). Current guidelines recommend biologics in combination with methotrexate as this shows better control of disease progression. However several studies show that up to 30% of patients are treated with biologic monotherapy for different reasons. The aim of the study was to know the characteristics of patients receiving biologic monotherapy, including previous treatments and reasons for treatment change.

Methods

Observational, cross-sectional, retrospective and multicentric study with the participation of 38 rheumatology units in Spain. Patients were consecutively included if they were >18, with moderate to severe RA with an inadequate response or intolerance to synthetic or biologic DMARD (as recommended by the Spanish Rheumatology Society, SER), treated with biologic DMARD in monotherapy for >6 months and gave informed consent.

Collected variables included sociodemographic (age, gender), clinical (RA diagnosis date, extra-articular manifestations, DAS28, CDAI and SDAI, presence of joint damage), and treatment (prior treatments with DMARD and reasons for change).

Results

Two hundred and nine patients were included, 82.8% were women, mean (SD) age was 57.6 (13.6). Mean (SD) time since RA diagnosis was 13.5 (8.8) years. Most had RF (59.8%), 38.3% anti-CCP antibodies, 73.7% joint damage; 28.5% had extra-articular manifestations.

At study visit, 58.4% of patients were receiving tocilizumab, 18.7% etanercept, 12.4% adalimumab, and 10.5% other biologics. Mean (SD) number of tender joints was 1.9 (3.0), of swollen joints was 0.84 (2.1); mean (SD) CRP level was 4.0 (7.7), and ESR was 14.6 (13.4). Mean (SD) DAS28 score was 2.7 (1.1), CDAI index was 8.4 (6.9), and SDAI index was 8.8 (7.1), with 49.8%, 15.8%, and 20.1% of patients on in remission, respectively.

28 of the 122 patients (23.0%) receiving monotherapy with tocilizumab were on first-line treatment, while 70.4% of patients with anti-TNF on monotherapy were on first-line.

The first synthetic DMARD prescribed was methotrexate (62.3%), followed by gold salts (17.9%). Mean time (months) since first DMARD prescription was 19.5 (52.8) [mean (SD)] and 89.8 (86.4) since the first biologic use.

Patients had received a mean (SD) of 2.6 (1.4) synthetic DMARDs and 1.7 (0.9) biologics.

Just before initiating monotherapy, 45.5% of patients had received synthetic+biologic DMARD, 30.6% synthetic DMARD as monotherapy, and 23.9% another biologic as monotherapy (30.0% adalimumab and 28.0% etanercept).

The most frequent reason for treatment withdrawal before monotherapy was lack of effectiveness (61.2%), intolerance (10.5%), adverse events (10.0%), and lack of adherence (1.5%). 

Conclusion

The clinical control with biologics as monotherapy was good, with a mean DAS28 of 2.7. Patients with RA treated with biologic DMARD as monotherapy had previously received more than 2 synthetic DMARD. The withdrawal of the DMARD was mainly due to lack of effectiveness, intolerance, or adverse event. Treatment with biologics as monotherapy is a therapeutic alternative for patients who do not tolerate or cannot receive synthetic DMARD.


Disclosure:

A. Gómez-Centeno,

Pfizer, Abbvie, Menarini, Roche, Amgen, MSD.,

2,

UCB, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Abbvie, Pfizer.,

5,

Pfizer, Roche, Abbvie, MSD, UCB, Menarini.,

8;

O. Martínez,
None;

F. J. Ballina,
None;

J. M. Rodríguez,
None;

J. Graña,
None;

M. Brito,
None;

J. Sampedro,
None;

G. Iglesias,
None;

C. Delgado,
None;

I. Monteagudo,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-biologic-therapy-as-monotherapy-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology