ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2514

Biological Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA): A Fifteen Years Multicentric Overview

Vittorio Grosso1, Roberto Gorla2, Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini3, Fabiola Atzeni4, Raffaele Pellerito5, Enrico Fusaro6, Giuseppe Paolazzi7, Pier Andrea Rocchetta8, Ennio Giulio Favalli9, Antonio Marchesoni10 and Roberto Caporali11, 1Division of Rheumatology,, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Foundation, Pavia, Italy, 2Reumatologia, Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy, 3Rheumatology Unit, University Hospital L Sacco, Milano, Italy, 4Rheumatology Unit, L. Sacco University Hospital, Milan, Italy, 5Rheumatology, Ospedale Mauriziano, Turin, Italy, 6Department of Rheumatology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy, 7Rheumatology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy, 8Struttura di Reumatologia A.S.O. «SS.Antonio e Biagio e C.Arrigo», Alessandria, Italy, 9Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milan, Italy, 10Department of Rheumatology, Gaetano Pini Institute, Milano, Italy, 11Rheumatology, Division of Rheumatology, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Biologic agents and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy: Therapeutic Strategies, Biomarkers and Predictors of Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose

During the last fifteen years, the role of biologics in the management of RA, the number of available biologics, and the recommendations of use, have changed. Moreover, several observational experiences pointed out a suboptimal adherence to the principles of treat-to-target.

The aim of this study is to assess differences in baseline characteristics of patient who started a first line biologic agent over time in a multicentric observational cohort (the LORHEN Registry) from 1999 until today.

Methods

In the LORHEN Registry, we identified all adult RA patients starting a first line biologic agent between 1 January 1999 and 31 May 2014. For the purpose of our analysis, we divided the patients in three time groups, according to the date of assessment of baseline disease variables: from 1999 to 2004 [99-04], from 2005 to 2010 [05-10] and from 2011 to May 2014 [11-14]. The comparison of baseline demographics, disease characteristics and previous treatments with csDMARDs in the 3 subgroups was performed.

Results

A total of 2373 RA patients from eight different rheumatologic centers were included. Patients treated in the [11-14] time group had a statistically significant lower baseline DAS28 and HAQ compared with previous time group. DAS28 at first switch was significantly lower in [11-14] patients, shrinking to mean values of moderate disease activity from those of high disease activity observed for patients in the [05-11] group. Disease duration and time before first switch did not differed significantly between groups.

Conclusion

The disease activity status at which RA patient starts biological treatment has progressively reduced: clinicians are now aiming at tighter control of RA activity.

The vast majority of patients starts biologic treatment only after years of csDMARDs, with an established disease, in conflict with the principles of treat-to-target. The incomplete availability of biological drugs over territory and economical concerns, in addition to incomplete adherence to international recommendations, might at least in part explain this occurrence.

The observation that real life population treated with biological drugs significantly differs for duration of disease from those selected in the majority of clinical trials should be taken into account when applying inferences from randomized controlled trials to everyday clinical practice.


Total

1999-2004

2005-2010

p with 1999-2004

2011-2014

p with

1999-2004

p with

2005-2011

Patients, num

2373

837

997

539

Female, num (%)

1942 (80,61%)

697 (79,84%)

813 (80,15%)

432 (80,15%)

Age in years, mean (±sd)

54,32 (±13,54)

54,81 (±13,48)

53,181 (±13,70)

ns *

55,68 (13,19)

ns *

ns *

Disease duration in year, median (IQR)

5,06 (1,74 – 11,85)

5,83 (1,26 – 12,61)

5,03 (1,83 – 11,14)

ns •

4,74 (1,96 – 10,95)

ns •

ns •

Previous csDMARDs, median (IQR)

2 (2 – 3)

3 (2 – 4)

2 (1 – 3)

<0,05 •

2 (1 – 3)

<0,05 •

ns •

DAS28, mean (±sd)

5,59 (±1,25)

5,93 (±1,04)

5,26 (±1,27)

<0,05 •

5,07 (±1,28)

<0,05 •

<0,05 •

HAQ, median (IQR)

1,25 (0,875 – 1,875)

1,375 (1,000 – 2,000)

1,25 (0,875 – 1,625)

<0,05 •

1,125 (0,625 – 1,625)

<0,05 •

<0,05 •

Table 1. Patients at baseline. IQR: interquartile range. *Student’ T test. • Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney’ test

Total

2005-2010

2011-2014

p

Patients, num

626

394

232

Months before first bDMARD discontinuation,

mean (±sd)

28,77 (±28,69)

26,90 (±24,70)

31,94 (±34,25)

ns •

DAS28, mean (±sd)

4,97 (±0,70)

5,15 (±1,30)

4,68 (±1,34)

<0,05 •

HAQ, median (IQR)

1,125 (0,625 – 1,625)

1,250 (0,750 – 1,750)

1,125 (0,625 – 1,500)

ns •

Table 2. Disease variables at first switch. IQR: interquartile range. *Student’ T test. • Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney’ test


Disclosure:

V. Grosso,
None;

R. Gorla,
None;

P. Sarzi-Puttini,
None;

F. Atzeni,
None;

R. Pellerito,
None;

E. Fusaro,
None;

G. Paolazzi,
None;

P. A. Rocchetta,
None;

E. G. Favalli,
None;

A. Marchesoni,
None;

R. Caporali,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/biological-treatment-for-rheumatoid-arthritis-ra-a-fifteen-years-multicentric-overview/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology