ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2766

Mycophenolate Mofetil in the Treatment of Primary  Central  Nervous  System  Vasculitis

Carlo Salvarani1, Robert D. Brown Jr.2, Teresa J. H. Christianson2, John Huston III2, Francesco Muratore1, Caterina Giannini2 and Gene G. Hunder3, 1Rheumatology Unit, Arcispedale S Maria Nuova, Reggio Emilia, Italy, 2Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 3Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: CNS Vasculitis, mycophenolate mofetil and outcomes

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Vasculitis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose .  The optimal management  of primary central nervous system vasculitis (PCNSV) remains unclear.   Cyclophosphamyde (CYC) in combination with glucocorticoids (GCs) or GCs alone are the most commonly used therapies.  It is not proven if other immunosuppressants, used in other  vasculitides, such as azathioprine (AZA), methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), that are less toxic than CYC,  can be used  as induction and/or maintenance  therapies.   The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy and safety of MMF in PCNSV.                      

Methods .  The study  cohort consisted  of 163 consecutive patients with PCNSV seen at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) from 1983 to 2011.  The diagnosis of PCNSV was based on findings of brain or spinal cord biopsy, cerebral angiography, or both.   To assess treatment response, we used the treating physician’s global opinion about the response to therapy. The degree of disability was defined using the modified Rankin scale. Outcomes, relapses, treatment response and ability to discontinue treatment at last follow-up were compared between patients treated with MMF and those receiving other  therapies.          

Results .  159/163 patients were treated at the time of diagnosis: 68 received GCs alone, 72  GCs and CYC,  2  CYC alone, 10  MMF and GCs, 6  AZA and GCs, and 1 rituximab and GCs.  6 more patients were treated with MMF after obtaining remission with CYC .  In total,  16 patients were treated with MMF:  7 males and 9 females with a median age  of 45.5 years (range:  20-72 years). Cerebral biopsy was performed in 10  and  was positive in 9 (3 associated cerebral amyloid angiopathy).  Clinical manifestations at presentation were:  headache (9 patients), altered cognition (9 patients), persistent neurologic deficit or stroke (8 patients),  seizures (6 patients) and  1 had intracranial hemorrhage.  Cerebral MRI showed infarctions in 10 patients (bilateral in 7) and prominent leptomeningeal enhancement in 4 patients. CSF abnormalities were observed in 14/16 patients. The median duration of follow-up was 34 months (range: 10-78 months). Cerebral angiography was positive in 7/11 patients and large vessel involvement was observed in 4 .  The median  dosage of MMF was 2 grams (range: 0.5-3 grams) and the median therapy duration 14.9 months (range: 1-31.6 months).   Rankin disability scores at diagnosis were similar  between patients treated with MMF and those receiving other therapies (Rankin score, 0-3: 68.7% versus  69.9%;  Rankin score, 4-6: 31.3% versus 30.1%; p = 1.000). A significantly lower proportion of patients treated with MMF had severe disability at last follow-up compared to those receiving  other therapies (Rankin score, 4-6:  0 versus 25.1%, p=0.023).  No statistically significant differences were observed in patients treated with MMF compared to those receiving other therapies regarding relapses [7/16 (43.7%) versus 37/143 (25.9%), p = 0.146], ability to discontinue therapy at last follow-up [4/16 (25%)  versus 36/142 (25.3%), p = 1.000], and treatment response [15/15 versus 111/142 (78.1%), p = 0.075]. Only 1 patient suspended MMF for a severe adverse event (leukopenia).                                                                                                                             

Conclusion .  In this retrospective study of a small number of PCNSV patients,  MMF was an effective and safe therapy.


Disclosure:

C. Salvarani,
None;

R. D. Brown Jr.,
None;

T. J. H. Christianson,
None;

J. Huston III,
None;

F. Muratore,
None;

C. Giannini,
None;

G. G. Hunder,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/mycophenolate-mofetil-in-the-treatment-of-primary-central-nervous-system-vasculitis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology