ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2960

Urate Genetic Loci and the Risk of Incident Cases of Confirmed Gout in Two Prospective Cohort Studies

Hyon K. Choi1, Gary Curhan2, Ying Bao3, Eli A. Stahl4, Peter Kraft5, Robert M. Plenge6, Yuqing Zhang1 and Tony R. Merriman7, 1Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 2German Research Center for Environmental Health, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Mt Sinai School of Medicine, New York City, NY, 5Program in Molecular and Genetic Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, 6Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy and Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 7Department of Biochemistry, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Genetics and gout

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Metabolic and Crystal Arthropathies II: Mechanisms of Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background: Gout is the most common inflammatory arthritis and is caused by hyperuricemia.  The Global Urate Genetics Consortium (GUGC) has recently validated 28 SNP associations in serum urate.  However, most corresponding data for the risk of gout have been based on suboptimal definitions (e.g., self-report, by the presence of hyperuricemia, or by anti-gout drug use) and prevalent cases (thus potentially selecting survivors given the risk of premature death associated with gout). To address these issues, we examined two large prospective cohorts and estimated the impact of the GUGC urate genetic loci on the risk of incident gout, which was ascertained by a widely-used standard definition.

Methods: The Health Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS) and Nurses’ Health Study (NHS) have systematically collected a wide range of exposures and health outcome data, including incident cases of gout, regularly for several decades.  We ascertained incident gout cases using the American College of Rheumatology survey criteria.  Using GWAS data from the two cohorts (4223 men from the HPFS and 6850 women from the NHS), we calculated a weighted genetic risk score (GRS) based on GUGC urate loci (possible range 0 to 58). Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association of GRS as well as individual urate loci with the risk of incident gout in these cohorts separately and together. 

 

Results: Over a total of 262,805 person years, we documented 1081 confirmed cases of incident gout (727 in the HPFS and 354 in the NHS). The GRS ranged from 12.2 to 44.5 among our study participants.  Increasing GRS scores were associated with an increasing risk of incident gout in both cohorts (P for heterogeneity > 0.17), and the pooled relative risks (RRs) for incident gout according to increasing GRS categories were 0.34, 0.66, 1.00 (referent), 1.37, 2.01, and 3.48 (P for trend < 0.001) (Table 1).  Our analyses for individual loci (Table 2) showed that SLC2A9, ABCG2, and GCKR were significantly associated with the risk of incident gout in each cohort as well as in the pooled cohort.  TMEM171, SLC17A1, INHBC, VEGFA, and UBE2Q2 were modestly associated only in men (HPFS), and PRKAG2, B4GALT1, MAF, and HLF were modestly associated only in women (NHS).  Heterogeneity between the sexes of these loci was significant for INHBC, PRKAG2, B4GALT1, and HLF. 

Conclusion: These two large prospective cohort studies confirm that the urate GRS scores are strongly associated with the risk of incident cases of confirmed gout among men as well as among women.  SLC2A9, ABCG2, and GCKR were most strongly associated with the risk of incident gout, and nine additional urate loci are more modestly associated with the risk as well.


 

Table 1. Relative risks (RRs) of Incident Gout According to Genetic Risk Score

 

Genetic Risk Score

<20.5

20.5 – <25.5

25.5 – <30.5

30.5 – <35.5

35.5 – <40.5

≥40.5

Ptrend

 

HPFS (Men)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of Cases/Person Years

11/3025

83/14241

232/29717

316/26820

79/4866

6/208

 

 

RR  (95% CI)

0.47 (0.25-0.85)

0.75 (0.58-0.96)

1.00 (referent)

1.51 (1.27-1.78)

2.08 (1.61-2.68)

3.68 (1.64-8.28)

<0.001

 

NHS (Women)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No. of Cases/Person Years

2/6344

34/32605

133/70479

143/62986

40/11148

2/366

 

 

RR  (95% CI)

0.17 (0.04-0.67)

0.55 (0.38-0.80)

1.00 (referent)

1.20 (0.95-1.52)

1.90 (1.33-2.70)

2.93 (0.73-11.83)

<0.001

 

Pooled Cohort

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RR  (95% CI)

0.34 (0.14-0.86)

0.66 (0.50-0.89)

1.00 (referent)

1.37 (1.10-1.70)

2.01 (1.64-2.48)

3.48 (1.72-7.00)

<0.001

 

Pheterogeneity

0.19

0.19

—

0.13

0.68

0.78

 

 

Table 2. RR of Incident Gout According to Individual Urate Loci (Limited to 12 Loci with Significance in at Least One or the Pooled Cohort)

 

 

SNP

Gene

Risk allele

HPFS

NHS

Pooled

Pheterogeneity

 

RR (95% CI)

P

RR (95% CI)

P

RR (95% CI)

P

 

rs12498742

SLC2A9

A

1.44 (1.26-1.64)

<0.001

1.76 (1.43-2.17)

<0.001

1.57 (1.29-1.90)

<0.001

0.11

 

rs2231142

ABCG2

T

1.71 (1.49-1.96)

<0.001

1.41 (1.15-1.74)

0.001

1.58 (1.32-1.90)

<0.001

0.14

 

rs1260326

GCKR

T

1.17 (1.06-1.30)

0.002

1.28 (1.10-1.48)

0.001

1.21 (1.11-1.31)

<0.001

0.35

 

rs17632159

TMEM171

C

0.89 (0.79-0.99)

0.04

0.97 (0.82-1.14)

0.692

0.91 (0.83-1.00)

0.057

0.38

 

rs1165151

SLC17A1

T

0.86 (0.77-0.95)

0.004

0.91 (0.79-1.06)

0.216

0.88 (0.80-0.95)

0.002

0.52

 

rs729761

VEGFA

T

0.84 (0.75-0.95)

0.005

1.00 (0.85-1.18)

0.99

0.91 (0.77-1.07)

0.27

0.10

 

rs3741414

INHBC

T

0.84 (0.74-0.95)

0.007

1.10 (0.93-1.31)

0.25

0.96 (0.73-1.25)

0.74

0.01

 

rs1394125

UBE2Q2

A

1.16 (1.05-1.29)

0.006

1.07 (0.92-1.25)

0.39

1.13 (1.04-1.24)

0.006

0.38

 

rs10480300

PRKAG2

T

1.05 (0.94-1.17)

0.42

0.83 (0.70-0.99)

0.04

0.94 (0.75-1.18)

0.60

0.03

 

rs10813960

B4GALT1

T

0.99 (0.88-1.11)

0.84

0.73 (0.62-0.88)

0.001

0.86 (0.64-1.15)

0.31

0.01

 

rs7188445

MAF

A

0.91 (0.82-1.02)

0.12

0.84 (0.72-0.99)

0.041

0.89 (0.81-0.98)

0.015

0.43

 

rs7224610

HLF

A

1.00 (0.90-1.11)

0.97

0.79 (0.68-0.91)

0.001

0.89 (0.71-1.13)

0.348

0.01

 

 

 


Disclosure:

H. K. Choi,

Takeda Pharmaceuticals International, Inc;,

5,

AstraZeneca,

5;

G. Curhan,
None;

Y. Bao,
None;

E. A. Stahl,
None;

P. Kraft,
None;

R. M. Plenge,
None;

Y. Zhang,
None;

T. R. Merriman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urate-genetic-loci-and-the-risk-of-incident-cases-of-confirmed-gout-in-two-prospective-cohort-studies/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology