ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 3013

The Reserve Capacity Model in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Understanding the Relationship of Socioeconomic Status, Psychosocial Resources, Mood, and Pain

Desiree Azizoddin1,2, Taylor Draper1,2, Sarah Ormseth3, Perry M. Nicassio4, Michael R. Irwin4, Michael Weisman5 and Hilary Wilson2, 1Psychology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, 2Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 3University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 4Cousins Center for PNI, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 5Rheumatology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Meeting: 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: mood, pain, psychology and socioeconomic status, Reserve capacity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Innovations in Rheumatologic Care

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

The Reserve Capacity Model in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: Understanding the Relationship of Socioeconomic Status, Psychosocial Resources, Mood, and Pain.

Background/Purpose: The reserve capacity model is a framework for understanding how low SES may affect health outcomes through both positive and negative emotions separately and the depletion of psychosocial resources. The purpose of this study was to explore the reserve capacity model in persons with rheumatoid arthritis, using structural equation modeling (SEM; see Figure 1). It was hypothesized that SES would be negatively related to self-reported pain directly and/or indirectly through the potential mediators of positively related psychosocial resources (reserve capacity) and negatively related negative mood. Methods: Data of 106 participants were drawn from a randomized comparative efficacy trial of psychosocial interventions for RA. In the hypothesized model, SES (years of education and annual income) predicted pain (Pain VAS and Rapid Assessment of Disease Activity in Rheumatology total joint score) through reserve capacity (Personal Mastery Scale, Arthritis Helplessness Index, and Social Provisions Scale), and negative mood (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, Perceived Stress Scale and the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule), using EQS 6.1 to evaluate the structural model. Results: SEM revealed a confirmed the hypothesized relations among model constructs (see Figure 1). Higher SES was positively associated with reserve capacity, which predicted lower levels of negative mood and related directly and positively to pain severity. The indirect effect of SES on pain via reserve capacity and negative mood was significant (βindirect=-.10, p=.027). Evidence supported a partial mediation of reserve capacity and negative mood between SES and pain, as the direct effect of SES on pain remained significant after controlling for the attenuating mediators of reserve capacity and negative mood. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of a multi-dimensional framework in evaluating pain in RA using a structural-equation approach. The mediating variables of reserve capacity and negative mood may play major roles in explaining pain in RA, and represent modifiable factors for targeted interventions.

                  Description: Macintosh HD:Users:jacklineghbalieh:Desktop:ARHPFlow_1.pdf


Disclosure:

D. Azizoddin,
None;

T. Draper,
None;

S. Ormseth,
None;

P. M. Nicassio,
None;

M. R. Irwin,
None;

M. Weisman,
None;

H. Wilson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2014 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-reserve-capacity-model-in-patients-with-rheumatoid-arthritis-understanding-the-relationship-of-socioeconomic-status-psychosocial-resources-mood-and-pain/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology