ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 437

Patterns Of Use Of Oral and Subcutaneous Methotrexate Use In Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients Enrolled In The U.S. Medicare Program

Jeffrey R. Curtis1, Fenglong Xie2, Jie Zhang1, Lang Chen3, Huifeng Yun4, Michael H. Schiff5, David Mackey6 and Seth Ginsberg7, 1Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Rheumatology & Immunology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 3Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Epidemiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 5Rheumatology Division, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, 6Clinical Immunology/Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 7Creaky Joints, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: DMARDs, methotrexate (MTX) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy I

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Although methotrexate (MTX) is the cornerstone of RA treatment, use of oral and subcutaneous (SC) preparations in real-world settings is not well characterized.

Methods:

Using national data from the U.S. Medicare program 2006-2010, we identified RA patients (pts) on the basis of 2 physician diagnosis codes initiating oral MTX (no prior use ever, minimum of 6m clean period) who had no use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), sulfasalazine (SSZ), or leflunomide (LEF) in the previous 6 mo with no prior biologic use. During follow-up (>=1 year required), dose escalation of oral MTX and switch to SC MTX, HCQ, SSZ, and LEF were characterized. Persistence with each was examined and defined as a gap > 90 days after the end of the days’ supply. Subsequent use and timing of addition of biologics was examined among those who had at least one switch, adjusting for multiple potential confounders using Cox proportional hazards models, using the switch date as the time axis.

Results:

New oral MTX users (n=20406) were 76.9% women, had mean +- SD age of 69.7 +- 11.7 years and contributed a median (IQR) follow-up of 2.6 (1.7, 3.5) years; 32.1% never changed dose of oral MTX and remained at their starting dose (most common dose: 7.5mg, 22%; and 10.0mg, 23%). Of all patients, only 39.4% used oral doses of >= 20mg/week at any time. At 1 year and beyond, 75.8% stayed on oral MTX (with or without dose increase) and did not add or switch to HCQ, SSZ, LEF, or SC MTX. The remainder switched or added HCQ (11.9%), SSZ (5.0%), LEF (9.3%) or switched to SC MTX (3.9%). The median (IQR) dose of oral MTX prior to switch to SC was 15.0 (12.5, 20.0) mg/wk and occurred at a median (IQR) of 292 (133,557) days. Persistence with SC MTZ, HCQ, SSZ, and LEF was similar (figure) and was lower than with oral MTX.

Overall, 19.1% of the cohort starting oral MTX initiated a biologic, mostly (84.7%) anti-TNF therapy. Of these individuals, 55.5% had never used MTX at a dose of >= 20mg prior to biologic use; 32.8% never used MTX at a dose of >= 15mg. Among pts who used biologics after a switch to SC MTX, the median (IQR) interval of time between switching to SC MTX and initiation of a biologic was 165 (66, 336) days. Among patients who increased oral MTX dose or switched to SC MTX or other nbDMARDs (n=12,652) and after multivariable adjustment, there were no significant differences in use of biologics between patients who switched to SC MTX vs. added or switched to SSZ or LEF. Pts who added HCQ were less likely to require biologics (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% CI 0.37-0.77), with some evidence suggesting that HCQ use was a proxy for less severe RA (not shown).

Conclusion:

Titration to higher doses of oral MTX and use of SC MTX preparations among Medicare pts with RA is infrequent and may be underutilized. Further work to optimize MTX dosing before pts are switched to a biologic may be warranted.


Disclosure:

J. R. Curtis,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescendo, AbbVie,

2,

Roche/Genentech, UCB, Janssen, CORRONA, Amgen, Pfizer, BMS, Crescnedo, AbbVie,

5;

F. Xie,
None;

J. Zhang,

Roche/Genentech,

2;

L. Chen,
None;

H. Yun,
None;

M. H. Schiff,

Antares biopharma, Abbvie, BMS, Pfizer, Amgen, Roche, UCB,

5;

D. Mackey,
None;

S. Ginsberg,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/patterns-of-use-of-oral-and-subcutaneous-methotrexate-use-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-patients-enrolled-in-the-u-s-medicare-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology