ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 593

Urinary Prostaglandin D Synthetase As a Biomarker Of Lupus Nephritis Activity:  One Year Longitudinal Study

Ranjan Gupta1, Akhilesh Yadav1, Ramnath Misra2 and Amita Aggarwal2, 1Department of Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India, 2Clinical Immunology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: SLE and Urinary Biomarkers

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects I - Renal, Malignancy, Cardiovascular Disease

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Proteomic analysis of urine samples, from patients with active lupus nephritis (LN)1-2 and from animal model of LN3 has led to identification of Prostaglandin D synthetase (PGDS) as a potential biomarker in LN. The levels were increased in patients with active LN as compared to inactive LN1.There is no longitudinal study available in patients with active LN to see its relationship with renal activity.

Methods: Patients fulfilling ACR criteria for diagnosis of SLE were included and categorized into active LN (ALN), active non renal disease (ANR) and inactive disease (ID). Urine was collected in the morning and stored after centrifugation. Patients with pregnancy or infection were excluded. Urine samples from 19 healthy young females were included as control. 25 patients with active lupus nephritis were followed up 3 monthly and urine samples were analyzed at 6, 9 and 12 months. Patients who had worsening renal disease at 3 months had sample analyzed at 3 months also. Urinary PGDS (uPGDS) was measured by ELISA using commercial kit. All values were normalized to urinary creatinine excretion.

Results:  A total of 28 patients with ALN, 15 patients with ANR, 6 patients with ID and 19 healthy controls were included in cross-sectional study. Among the 49 patients, there were 46 females. Mean age was 27.8(SD 9.5) years. The median SLEDAI in ALN was 20(6-32), in ANR was 9(4-18) and in ID was 3(0-4). In patients with ALN, the median renal SLEDAI was 10(4-16). The class of LN was II in 4, III in 11, IV in 6, V in 3 and in 4 patients biopsy could not be done.

In cross-sectional study, the median uPGDS excretion was higher in patients with ALN (61.85 ng) as compared to healthy controls (14.17ng; p<0.001),  ANR ( 21.31ng; p=ns) and ID (5.62 ng; p<0.005). uPGDS had good correlation with renal SLEDAI (r=0.403; p=0.006) and total SLEDAI (r=0.406; p=0.007).

In longitudinal study of 28 patients with ALN, 25 patients had completed 6 months, 20 patients 9 months and 13 patients 12 months follow-up. uPDGS had excellent correlation with SLEDAI, rSLEDAI and urinary protein creatinine ratio over time. The median values are shown in the line diagram below at 0, 6, 9 and 12 months.

One patient with class IV nephritis had no response at 3 months with rise in serum creatinine. Her urine sample at 3 months showed a marked rise in uPGDS (41.89 to 390.85ng). She was treated with Rituximab but developed  ESRD at 6 months.

The only patient who showed a significant rise in uPGDS at 9 months (baseline: 13.9: 6 months: 10.9: 9 months 47.96 ng) relapsed at 11 months.

 

Conclusion: uPGDS is a good marker of lupus activity. uPGDS is partly serum derived3 as its levels are higher in patients with ANR disease than ID. Its levels are higher in nephritis and can be used to monitor renal activity. It may be a potential marker to predict relapse.

References: 1J Prot 2012;75:3240-7.2Ped Res 2009;65:530-6.3J Immunol2010;184;2183-93.

 


Disclosure:

R. Gupta,
None;

A. Yadav,
None;

R. Misra,
None;

A. Aggarwal,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/urinary-prostaglandin-d-synthetase-as-a-biomarker-of-lupus-nephritis-activity-one-year-longitudinal-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology