ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2191

Secretagogue Use in Patients with Primary Sjogren’s Syndrome

Ghaith Noaiseh1, Joshua Baker2 and Frederick B. Vivino3, 1Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 2Medicine/Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 3Medicine, Penn Presbyt Med Ctr, Philadelphia, PA

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pilocarpine and treatment, Sjogren's syndrome

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Sjögren's Syndrome - Clinical

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:  

Secretagogues are commonly used to treat xerostomia in primary Sjogren’s syndrome (pSS). Side effects and/or lack of efficacy sometimes result in cessation of therapy. Our aim was to determine clinical and laboratory predictors associated with therapeutic failures.

Methods:

We retrospectively reviewed use of the secretagogues, pilocarpine (PC) and cevimeline (CV), in patients with pSS who fulfilled the 2002 American European Consensus Group criteria; followed from January 2002 to June 2012.  Individuals with inadequate follow up (less than two visits) were excluded. Baseline variables included age, sex, duration of xerostomia, anti Ro (SSA) and anti La (SSB) antibodies, rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibodies (ANA), complement levels, beta 2 microglobulin, serum protein electrophoresis, smoking history, unstimulated salivary flow rate, scintigraphy scores, focus score on lip biopsy, and previous use of hydroxychloroquine. Failure of therapy was defined as the clinician or patient’s decision to stop treatment either due to lack of efficacy or side effects.

Results:

Among 118 patients with pSS (92.4% female, mean age 61.4 years), PC was used in 72 (59 first users, 13 second users) and CV in 91 (59 first users, 32 second users). Cevimeline was associated with lower failure rates among all users (29/91, 31.9%) than PC (44/72, 61.1%) (p<0.001). Among first-time users, CV was also associated with lower failure rates (16/59, 27.1%) versus PC (28/59, 47.5%). (p=0.02). Severe sweating was the most frequent side effect leading to cessation of therapy and occurred more frequently among patients using PC (18/72, 25%) than CV (10/91, 11%) (p=0.02). Patients who previously failed one secretagogue were less likely to discontinue treatment with the other agent: i.e. 61/118 (51.7%) of first-time users compared to 12/45 (26.7%) of second-time users (p= 0.004). Among all users, the proportion of subjects stopping medication for any documented side effect tended to be higher in the PC group (31/72, 43.1%) than CV group (23/91, 25.3%) (p=0.09). Among the various clinical and laboratory parameters studied; only ANA positivity was associated with therapeutic failure: 45/76 (59%) of ANA-positive patients vs. 15/40 (38%) of ANA-negative patients discontinued for any reason. (p=0.03)

Conclusion:

Our data suggests that patients with pSS who take secretagogues for xerostomia are more likely to continue cevimeline than pilocarpine long-term. This is primarily due to a lower incidence of severe sweating (the most common side effect of therapy).  However, therapeutic failure of one secretagogue did not predict similar results with the other. Second time users may be more likely to continue long-term treatment due to the lack of effective therapeutic alternatives. Among various clinical and laboratory features of pSS, only ANA positivity was associated with a higher likelihood of treatment failure. Further studies are needed to confirm these observations.


Disclosure:

G. Noaiseh,
None;

J. Baker,
None;

F. B. Vivino,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/secretagogue-use-in-patients-with-primary-sjogrens-syndrome/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology