ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 801

Remaining Pain Is Common In Early RA Patients Treated With Methotrexate – Results From The EIRA Cohort and The Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register

Reem Altawil1, Saedis Saevarsdottir2, Sara Wedren3, Lars Alfredsson4, Lars Klareskog2 and Jon Lampa1, 1Rheumatology Unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden, 2Medicine, Rheumatology unit, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 4Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: pain and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects I: Treatment Strategies in Rheumatoid Arthritis

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Although treatment with methotrexate is often efficient in decreasing inflammation and joint destruction in RA, several patients report remaining pain at follow-up (Taylor P et al, J Int Med Res 2010), and the potential discrepancy between decrease in inflammation and pain needs to be explored further. We investigated the frequency and possible predictors of remaining pain after 3 months treatment with MTX as the only DMARD treatment in early RA, with special focus on the patients who had a good clinical response to MTX.

Methods: The study base was cases reported to the Epidemiological investigation of RA (EIRA) cohort 1996-2009 who had follow-up data in the Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register (1996-2010), a total of 1241 patients (69% women). Disease activity was measured with the 28-joint based disease activity score (DAS28) and the EULAR response criteria were used to evaluate clinical response to treatment. The primary endpoint was ‘remaining pain’ at the 3 months follow-up visit, defined as pain according to a 100 mm visual analog scale above 20 mm (VAS pain >20 mm), which has earlier been stated as a cutoff for patient reported significant pain (Wolfe F et al, J Rheumatol 2007). The association between baseline parameters and remaining pain was evaluated by logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI), adjusted for age at onset/treatment start, gender and cigarette smoking status.

Results: Median VAS-pain was 54 mm at baseline and 25 mm at the 3 months follow-up visit. Remaining pain was observed in 57% of all patients at the 3 months follow-up. The frequency of EULAR good/moderate/no response was 40%/38%/22% respectively, and in these response groups, the frequency of remaining pain was 29%/70%/83% respectively. In the EULAR good responder group (n=421), remaining pain was associated with more disability at baseline (HAQ; adjusted OR 2.2, 95%CI=1.4-3.4 per unit increase) and less inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate, ESR; adjusted OR 0.81; 95%CI=0.70-0.93 per 10 mm increase). In line with this, patients who were EULAR good responders and had a remaining pain at follow-up exhibited lower ESR (p<0.02) and higher HAQ (p<0.02) at baseline compared to patients with less pain. Moreover, increase in VAS pain during the treatment period was observed in 19% of the whole cohort and frequencies of increased pain in the response groups were 9%/15%/45% respectively.

Conclusion: Majority of early RA patients starting methotrexate monotherapy at diagnosis have remaining pain after 3 months.  Further, almost 1/5 of the patients actually exhibit increase in VAS pain during treatment. Despite good response to methotrexate, almost a third of those patients have remaining pain, and in moderate responders, more than two thirds of the patients have remaining pain. Remaining pain despite a good response to MTX is associated with more disability and less inflammation at baseline. These results are in line with the hypothesis that a subgroup of early RA patients exhibits pain that is not inflammatory mediated and where non-RA causes and alternative treatment strategies can be discussed.


Disclosure:

R. Altawil,
None;

S. Saevarsdottir,
None;

S. Wedren,
None;

L. Alfredsson,
None;

L. Klareskog,
None;

J. Lampa,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/remaining-pain-is-common-in-early-ra-patients-treated-with-methotrexate-results-from-the-eira-cohort-and-the-swedish-rheumatology-quality-register/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology