ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2236

Cross Cultural Validation of English and French Versions of a Disease Specific Patient Reported Outcome Measure for Lupus in Canada

Josiane Bourré-Tessier1, Ann E. Clarke2, Rachel A. Mikolaitis3, Mark Kosinski4, Sasha Bernatsky5, Joel A. Block3 and Meenakshi Jolly6, 1Rheumatology, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada, 2Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 3Section of Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, 4QualityMetric Inc, Lincoln, RI, 5McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada, 6Rheumatology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Patient questionnaires, Quality of life and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Clinical Aspects

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The LupusPRO, a disease targeted Patient Reported Outcome measure, was developed and validated in US patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). We aimed to validate English and French versions of the LupusPRO among SLE patients in Canada.

Methods: The English version of the LupusPRO was administered to English-speaking SLE patients in Canada and the French version to French-speaking patients. Patients also completed the MOS SF-36. Physicians assessed disease activity (SELENA-SLEDAI and visual analogue scale) and damage (SLICC-ACR SDI and visual analogue scale). A mail back LupusPRO was completed within 2-3 days of the index visit. Internal consistency reliability (ICR), test-retest reliability (TRT), concurrent validity (corresponding domains of the SF-36) and criterion validity (against disease activity and damage) were tested. Confirmatory factor analysis results were available thus far only for the English version. All reported p values are two tailed.

Results: A total of 222 Canadian SLE patients participated – 123 English speaking and 99 French speaking (table 1). Among the English-speaking patients, the ICR of the LupusPRO domains ranged from 0.60-0.93, while TRT ranged from 0.62-0.95. Concurrent validity with corresponding domains of the SF-36 was present and the LupusPRO domains performed well against disease activity and/or damage measures establishing its criterion validity. Confirmatory factor analysis showed a good fit.

Among the French-speaking patients, the ICR of the LupusPRO domains ranged from 0.81-0.93, except for Lupus Symptoms (0.58), Procreation (0.79) and Coping (0.44) domains. By deleting the item on religiosity/spirituality from the Coping domain, the ICR of this domain improved to 0.64. TRT ranged from 0.72-0.95. Concurrent validity with corresponding domains of the SF-36 was present. Lupus Symptoms domain correlated with disease activity as assessed by the total SLEDAI (r -0.26, p 0.01) and physician completed visual analog scale (r -0.49, p 0.001). Other domains also performed well against disease activity and/or damage.

Conclusion: The English and French versions of the LupusPRO have fair psychometric properties among Canadian patients with SLE, and are now available to be included in clinical trials and in longitudinal studies for testing of responsiveness to change.

Table 1. Description of the study cohort

 

English-speaking patients

N= 123

French-speaking patients

N = 99

Age (Mean, SD) years

47.7 (14.8)

45.2 (14.5)

Female (%)

94

97

Ethnicity (%)

  Caucasian

  Asian

  African-Caribbean

  Other

–

60.0

23.0

9.0

8.0

–

73.7

6.1

11.1

9.1

SELENA SLEDAI (Median, IQR)

MD-Activity VAS (Median, IQR)

SDI (Median, IQR)

MD-Damage VAS (Median, IQR)

4.0 (6.0)

0.2 (0.95)

1.0 (3.0)

0.3 (2.8)

3.0 (6.0)

0.2 (1.00)

1.0 (2.0)

0.2 (3.4)


Disclosure:

J. Bourré-Tessier,

GlaxoSmithKline ,

5;

A. E. Clarke,

Human Genome Sciences, Inc.,

5,

Glaxo Smith Kline,

8,

Bristol-Myers Squibb,

5,

MedImmune,

5;

R. A. Mikolaitis,
None;

M. Kosinski,
None;

S. Bernatsky,
None;

J. A. Block,
None;

M. Jolly,

GlaxoSmithKline,

5,

MedImmune,

7,

The Binding Site,

2,

Lupus Foundation of America,

2.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/cross-cultural-validation-of-english-and-french-versions-of-a-disease-specific-patient-reported-outcome-measure-for-lupus-in-canada/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology