ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • 2026 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 065

Screening for Social Determinants of Health Identifies Differences Based on Insurance Types in a Single Pediatric Rheumatology Division

Patricia Hoffman1, Naiva Manuela Piatchou Donfack2, Deanna Jannat-Khah1, Melissa Flores1, Jillian Rose2 and Alisha Akinsete3, 1Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 2Hospital for Special Surgery, 3Weill Cornell

Meeting: 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Thursday, March 19, 2026

Title: Posters: Quality, Health Services, and Education Research I

Session Time: 6:00PM-7:00PM

Background/Purpose:
Social Determinants of Health (SDoH) are the conditions and environments in which people are born, grow, live, work, and play, and affect quality of life and health outcomes. SDoH are well described in the literature to either positively or negatively impact pediatric patients and their prognoses. Patients with chronic conditions, especially seen in rheumatology, require frequent medical visits that can present as opportunities for assessing patients’ SDoH. Insurance status is a proxy of socioeconomic status and varies greatly in New York. We aimed to identify differences between positive SDoH screening rates and differences of social unmet needs of patients with private and public insurance.

Methods:
We performed a single-center retrospective study of patients evaluated by the Pediatric Rheumatology Division at Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) in New York, New York between 2023-2025. We assessed 5 categories of SDoH that included food insecurity, housing instability, transportation needs, utility difficulty, and employment difficulty. Our patient cohort was obtained from a SDoH quality improvement project at HSS. Our SDoH screener was adapted from WE CARE, PRAPARE, and AHC CMS Screening Tools and filled out by patients’ parents.

SDoH screening rate was calculated by dividing the number of patients screened (patients with any SDoH datapoints) by the number of patients given screeners. SDoH positive screening rate was calculated by dividing the number of patients with any positive (Yes) SDoH by the number of patients with any SDoH datapoints. Patients who screened positive were provided resources and social work intervention as appropriate. Pearson Chi Square test and Fisher Exact test were conducted to compare SDoH between private and public health insurance holders. In addition, SDoH screening and SDoH positive screening rates were compared across insurance types. All statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (version 2024.04.1). The significance level was set at 0.05.

Results:
Of 1336 eligible patients for SDoH screening, 371 (27.8%) had public insurance and 965 (72.2%) had private insurance. These patients had a mean age of 12 years old and predominantly attended follow-up visits (Table 1). The overall SDoH screening rate was 59.17%, but the overall positive SDoH screening rate was 7.63%. However, patients with public insurance had higher positive SDoH screening rates (Table 2). Furthermore, these higher positive screening rates were across all 5 SDoH categories (food insecurity [13.94% vs. 1.26%, p < 0.001], housing instability [12.50% vs. 1.77%, p < 0.001], transportation needs [6.48% vs. 0.88%, p < 0.001], utility difficulty [12.56% vs. 2.16%, p < 0.001], and employment difficulty [17.48% vs. 3.96%, p< 0.001]) (Table 3).

Conclusion:
Patients with public insurance showed higher positive SDoH screening rates compared to patients with private insurance within a single center. Employment difficulty was the highest unmet need across groups, followed by food insecurity in public insurance and utility difficulty in private insurance. Clinicians should be aware of these differences. Additional research is needed to understand how unmet needs affect outcomes in pediatric rheumatic disease.

DemographicsSupporting image 1

CMS Screening by Insurance TypeSupporting image 2

Social Determinants of Health by Insurance TypeSupporting image 3


Disclosures: P. Hoffman: None; N. Piatchou Donfack: EMD SERONO, 3; D. Jannat-Khah: AstraZeneca, 11, Cytodyn, 11; M. Flores: None; J. Rose: None; A. Akinsete: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hoffman P, Piatchou Donfack N, Jannat-Khah D, Flores M, Rose J, Akinsete A. Screening for Social Determinants of Health Identifies Differences Based on Insurance Types in a Single Pediatric Rheumatology Division [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2026; 78 (suppl 3). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/screening-for-social-determinants-of-health-identifies-differences-based-on-insurance-types-in-a-single-pediatric-rheumatology-division/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2026 Pediatric Rheumatology Symposium

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/screening-for-social-determinants-of-health-identifies-differences-based-on-insurance-types-in-a-single-pediatric-rheumatology-division/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to PRYSM are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 6:00 PM CT on March 18. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2026 American College of Rheumatology