ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2320

Sleep Disturbance in Psoriatic Arthritis: Prevalence by Minimal Disease Activity Status and Associated Clinical Factors

Lourdes Perez Chada1, Vivi Feather2, Grace Carter2, Helen Early3, Emily Tsai2, Jing Cui4, Avery LaChance5, Rochelle Castillo6, Neda shahriari2, Alexis Ogdie7, Monika Haack2, Elizabeth Klerman2, Michael Weinblatt8, Nancy Shadick9, Joseph Merola10 and Chinmayi Naik3, 1Harvard Medical School, Wayland, MA, 2Mass General Brigham, Boston, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 4Brigham Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 5Brigham and Women's Hospital, Jamaica Plain, MA, 6Brigham and Women's Hospital, Brookline, MA, 7Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Wilmington, DE, 8Brigham and Women's Hospital/ Harvard Medical School, Waban, MA, 9Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 10UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: pain, Psoriatic arthritis, sleep, spondyloarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (2305–2337) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Diagnosis, Manifestations, & Outcomes Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Sleep disturbance is a common and burdensome symptom in psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but its clinical determinants remain poorly understood. Using data from the Cohort for Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (COPPAR), we aimed to (1) compare the prevalence of sleep disturbance between patients who met Minimal Disease Activity (MDA) criteria and those who did not, and (2) identify clinical and patient-reported factors associated with sleep disturbance.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included patients with PsA enrolled in COPPAR. The primary outcome was the sleep item from the PsAID-9 questionnaire (0–10 scale). We compared the prevalence of clinically meaningful sleep disturbance (defined as PsAID sleep score > 4) between patients in MDA and those not in MDA using chi-square tests. We evaluated predictors using a general linear model (GLM) for the continuous PsAID sleep score. The initial models included age, sex, pain, itch, PHQ-8, FACIT fatigue, PROMIS anxiety, skin and joint global assessments, DLQI, MDHAQ, enthesitis score, tender/swollen joint counts, and topical treatment use. Sleep disorder diagnosis was added in sensitivity analysis.

Results: Among 204 patients with PsA, 112 (54.9%) were female, and 191 (93.6%) identified as White. MDA was achieved by 101 participants (49.5%). A diagnosis of sleep disorder was reported in 36 participants (17.6%). Most (n = 173, 84.8%) were on biologic, targeted synthetic, or conventional systemic therapy, and 111 (55%) used topical agents. Among those in MDA, 9 (8.9%) reported a PsAID-9 sleep score > 4, compared to 37 (35.9%) among those not in MDA. PsAID-9 sleep scores were significantly associated with MDA status (χ² = 20.53, p < 0.0001).In the primary GLM (R² = 0.52), pain severity (β = 0.47, p < 0.0001) was the strongest independent predictor of worse sleep. Greater itch (β = 0.25, p = 0.0003) and fatigue (lower FACIT; β = –0.09, p < 0.0001) were also significantly associated with worse sleep. Current topical agent use was associated with better sleep (β = –0.60, p = 0.039). PHQ-8 score was not retained in the final model.In the sensitivity model (R² = 0.55), sleep disorder diagnosis was independently associated with worse sleep (β = 0.90, p = 0.013). Pain (β = 0.46, p < 0.0001), itch (β = 0.24, p = 0.0007), fatigue (β = –0.05, p = 0.0287), and PHQ-8 score (β = 0.11, p = 0.0498) were also independently associated with worse sleep. Topical treatment use remained protective (β = –0.64, p = 0.024).

Conclusion: Patients in MDA were significantly less likely to report clinically meaningful sleep disturbance. In multivariable models, worse sleep was consistently associated with higher pain, greater itch, and more fatigue. Longitudinal studies are needed to better understand temporal relationships and inform targeted sleep interventions in PsA.

Supporting image 1NRS, Numerical Rating Scale

All estimates are from a fully adjusted model.

Beta coefficients represent the mean change in PsAID-9 sleep score per unit increase in the predictor (or the difference in means for binary predictors).

*Age and sex were retained in all models regardless of statistical significance

Supporting image 2NRS, Numerical Rating Scale

All estimates are from a fully adjusted sensitivity model including sleep disorder diagnosis.

Beta coefficients represent the mean change in PsAID-9 sleep score per unit increase in the predictor (or the difference in means for binary predictors).

*Age and sex were retained in all models regardless of statistical significance


Disclosures: L. Perez Chada: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 6, Takeda, 2; V. Feather: None; G. Carter: None; H. Early: None; E. Tsai: None; J. Cui: None; A. LaChance: Guidepoint, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MedaCorp, 2, 6, Merck/MSD, 5, Pfizer, 5, TD Cowen, 2, 6; R. Castillo: Chronicle Medical Software, Inc., 2; N. shahriari: None; A. Ogdie: AbbVie, 5, Amgen, 5, 11, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, Celgene, 5, CorEvitas, 2, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, 11, Pfizer, 5, 11; M. Haack: None; E. Klerman: Buck Institute on Aging, 2, Chronsulting, 12, Partner is founder and CSO, Lorentz Center, 12, Travel support, Sleep Research Society, 6, 12, Travel support, Society for Research in Biological Rhythms, 12, Travel support; M. Weinblatt: aclaris, 2, amgen, 2, anaptysbio, 2, Artiva Bio, 2, Biohaven, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, Canfite, 11, Curie Bio, 2, Deep Cure, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Gilead, 2, Ignite, 2, Inmedix, 11, Janssen, 5, Janux Therapeutics, 2, Johnson and Johnson, 2, Lifordi, 2, Marvel Bio, 2, Matchpoint, 2, Merck/MSD, 2, Neutrolis, 2, Novartis, 2, Sana, 2, Santa Ana, 2, Sci Rhom, 2, scipher medcine corp, 11, SetPoint Medical, 2, Surf Therapeutics, 2, Thymmune, 2, Xencorp, 2, ZuraBio, 2; N. Shadick: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Janssen, 5; J. Merola: AbbVie/Abbott, 2, 12, Investigator, Amgen, 2, 12, Investigator, Arena, 2, Avotres, 2, Biogen, 2, 12, Investigator, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Celgene, 2, Dermavant, 2, 12, Investigator, Eli Lilly, 2, 12, Investigator, EMD Serono, 2, Janssen, 2, 12, Investigator, Leo Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Pfizer, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2, 12, Investigator, Sanofi, 2, 12, Investigator, Sun Pharma, 2, 12, Investigator, UCB, 2, 12, Investigator; C. Naik: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Perez Chada L, Feather V, Carter G, Early H, Tsai E, Cui J, LaChance A, Castillo R, shahriari N, Ogdie A, Haack M, Klerman E, Weinblatt M, Shadick N, Merola J, Naik C. Sleep Disturbance in Psoriatic Arthritis: Prevalence by Minimal Disease Activity Status and Associated Clinical Factors [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sleep-disturbance-in-psoriatic-arthritis-prevalence-by-minimal-disease-activity-status-and-associated-clinical-factors/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/sleep-disturbance-in-psoriatic-arthritis-prevalence-by-minimal-disease-activity-status-and-associated-clinical-factors/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology