ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1963

Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Pre-existing Dactylitis: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Results From the Phase 4 MOSAIC Study

mikael Boesen1, Philip J. Mease2, Walter P Maksymowych3, Robert G. W. Lambert4, Olga Kubassova5, John Carrino6, Kamyar Moradi7, Michael R. Bubb8, Guillermo Valenzuela9, Kurt de Vlam10, Jyotsna Reddy11, Siddharth Chaudhari11, Zhenwei Zhou11 and Mikkel Ostergaard12, 1Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2Department of Rheumatology, Providence-Swedish Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 3Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 4University of Alberta, Department of Radiology & Diagnostic Imaging, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 5Image Analysis Group, Philadelphia, PA, 6Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, 7Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 8University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 9Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists, Plantation, FL, 10Department of Rheumatology, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium, 11Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, 12Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark, and Copenhagen Center for Arthritis Research, Center for Rheumatology, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2025

Title: (1936–1971) Imaging of Rheumatic Diseases Poster

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Primary results from the phase 4 MOSAIC trial demonstrated that apremilast (APR) improved inflammation in patients (pts) with PsA based on PsA MRI scoring of the hand. Pts also underwent optional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI), which evaluated perfusion within soft tissues and bone marrow of the hand to estimate the degree of joint and soft tissue inflammation in dactylitis, a hallmark of PsA characterized by swelling and inflammation of digits. We report the efficacy of APR in pts from the MOSAIC trial with pre-existing dactylitis.

Methods: MOSAIC (NCT03783026) was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study that evaluated pts with PsA (duration: 3 mo to 5 y; met CASPAR criteria) who received oral APR 30 mg twice daily for up to 48 weeks. Conventional MRIs of pts with clinically reported dactylitis at baseline (BL; digit not specified) were read by an independent radiologist to determine the most affected dactylitic finger. Another 2 independent readers, blinded to time point and clinical information, reviewed DCE-MRI using the Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Quantification (DEMRIQ) method; the volume of contrast-enhanced voxels in dactylitic fingers and joints were calculated: volume of enhancement (DEMRIQ-Vol), volume of enhancement × mean maximum enhancement (DEMRIQ-ME), and volume of enhancement × mean initial rate of enhancement (DEMRIQ-IRE) within each region of interest around each digit and joint. We report changes in these 3 DCE-MRI outcomes in the MRI-determined most-affected joint of the dactylitic finger, as well as in clinical disease activity measured by the Leeds Dactylitis Index (LDI) and the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) at Week (W) 24 and W48 (clinical assessments not blinded to time point).

Results: Thirty-two pts in MOSAIC had both BL dactylitis and W24 imaging (mean age: 41.6 y; mean PsA duration: 1.9 y; moderate Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA [cDAPSA] score [ >13 to ≤27]: 46.9%; high cDAPSA score [ >27]: 50.0%); 23 had W48 imaging. Statistically significant decreases in DEMRIQ-Vol (W24 and W48) and DEMRIQ-ME (W48) were observed for the MRI-determined most-affected joint (P< 0.05; Figures 1, 2). DEMRIQ-IRE showed no significant change. Statistically significant decreases in the mean (95% CI) change from BL were observed for clinical outcomes at W24 (LDI: -36.8 [-44.4, -29.2]; PASDAS: -2.3 [-2.8, -1.8]) and W48 (LDI: -39.5 [-47.8, -31.1]; PASDAS: -2.3 [-2.9, -1.8]; Figure 3). At W48, 26/28 pts (92.9%) had an LDI of 0, and 13/31 pts (41.9%) had PASDAS < 3.2 (indicating minimal disease activity). Subgroup analyses by BL disease activity will be presented.

Conclusion: There were significant reductions in DEMRIQ-ME and DEMRIQ-Vol with APR at W24 and/or W48; DEMRIQ-IRE did not show significant changes. Clinical outcomes significantly improved. DCE-MRI outcomes suggest increased capillary permeability, synovial and joint capsule volume, engorged microvasculature, and delayed contrast washout within dactylitic finger joints in PsA that improve at different rates after APR treatment and highlight the potential of using different DCE-MRI parameters to understand, quantify, and monitor the complex inflammatory load and response to treatment in pts with PsA and dactylitis.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: m. Boesen: AbbVie, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Image Analysis Group, 2, 6, 11, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; P. Mease: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Acelyrin, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, Century, 2, Cullinan, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Inmagene, 2, J&J Innovative Medicine, 2, 5, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sana, 5, Spyre, 5, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; W. Maksymowych: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, 12, Educational grants, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 5, 6, CARE Arthritis, 12, Chief Medical Officer, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, 12, educational grants, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, 12, educational grants, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 6; R. Lambert: AbbVie, 2, CARE Arthritis and Image Analysis Group, 2; O. Kubassova: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Ferring, 2, 5, 6, Image Analysis Group, 3, 11, Medipost, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, 6, Werfen, 2, 5, 6; J. Carrino: Arthritis & Rheumatology, 12, Editorial Board, Carestream, 4, Cartilage Imaging, 12, Editorial Board, Covera, 2, Image Analysis Group, 4, Image Biopsy Lab, 4, Radiology, 12, Editorial Board; K. Moradi: None; M. Bubb: AbbVie/Abbott, 5, Alexion, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Argenyx, 5, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 5, Priovant, 5, Restem, 5, UCB, 5; G. Valenzuela: AbbVie, 1, 2, 2, 6, 6, Alexion, 1, 2, Amgen, 1, 2, 6, Artiva Biotherapeutics, 2, 5, AstraZeneca, 6, Boehringer-Ingelheim, 1, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Celgene, 1, 2, 6, Centocor, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 6, Esaote, 1, Exagen, 1, 2, Genentech, 1, 2, 6, Gilead, 1, 2, Global Healthy Living Foundation, 1, 2, Horizon, 1, 2, 6, Image Analysis Group, 1, Janssen, 1, 2, 6, Mallinckrodt, 5, 6, Merck, 1, 2, Novartis, 1, 2, 6, Pfizer, 1, 2, 6, Pharmacia, 1, 2, 6, Radius, 6, Regeneron, 1, 2, 6, Sandoz, 1, 2, Sanofi, 1, 2, 6, Takeda, 6, Theramex, 6, UCB, 1, 2, 6, Vividion therapeutics, 1, 2; K. de Vlam: AbbVie, 2, 6, Alphasigma, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, J&J, 2, 6, Lilly, 2, 6, MoonLake, 2, Novartis, 2, 6, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, UCB, 6; J. Reddy: Amgen Inc., 3, 11; S. Chaudhari: Amgen Inc., 3, 11; Z. Zhou: Amgen Inc., 3, 11; M. Ostergaard: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, MEDAC, 6, Merck, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Sandoz, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Boesen m, Mease P, Maksymowych W, Lambert R, Kubassova O, Carrino J, Moradi K, Bubb M, Valenzuela G, de Vlam K, Reddy J, Chaudhari S, Zhou Z, Ostergaard M. Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis and Pre-existing Dactylitis: Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Results From the Phase 4 MOSAIC Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-apremilast-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-and-pre-existing-dactylitis-dynamic-contrast-enhanced-mri-results-from-the-phase-4-mosaic-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-apremilast-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-and-pre-existing-dactylitis-dynamic-contrast-enhanced-mri-results-from-the-phase-4-mosaic-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology