ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1671

Emapalumab Treatment for Patients with Differing Presentations of Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) Secondary to Still’s Disease: Results from a Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Trials

Alexiei GROM1, Sebastiaan Vastert2, Jordi anton3, Pierre Quartier4, Bruno Fautrel5, Paul Brogan6, Edward Behrens7, Melissa Elder8, Francesca Minoia9, Pavla Dolezalova10, Robert Biesen11, Masaki Shimizu12, Uwe Ullmann13, Adnan Mahmood14, Andrew Danquah13, Elena Burillo13, Marco Petrimpol13, Steve Mallett15, Brian Jamieson16 and Fabrizio De Benedetti17, 1Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Division of Rheumatology, Cincinnati, OH, 2University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands, 3Hospital Sant Joan de Düu. Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 4Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France, 5Sorbonne Université - APHP, Department of Rheumatology, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Inserm UMRS 1136-5, PARIS, France, Paris, France, 6Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust and University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom, 7CHOP, West Chester, PA, 8College of Medicine and Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida, GAINESVILLE, FL, 9Pediatric Immuno-Rheumatology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy, 10Paediatric Rheumatology and Autoinflammatory Diseases Unit, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic, 11Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, Berlin, Germany, 12Department of Pediatrics and Developmental Biology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan, 13Sobi, Basel, Switzerland, 14Sobi, Stockholm, Sweden, 15Sobi, Stock, Sweden, 16Sobi Inc., Morrisville, NC, 17Bambino Gesu Children's Hospital, Rome, Rome, Italy

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, glucocorticoids, interferon, macrophage activation syndrome, Still's disease

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Pediatric Rheumatology – Clinical I (1668–1673)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:45PM-2:00PM

Background/Purpose: MAS is a life-threatening complication of Still’s disease characterized by systemic IFNg-driven hyperinflammation. Patients with Still’s disease may present with MAS at any disease stage, including at the time of initial diagnosis. MAS episodes may also recur. Emapalumab, an anti-IFNg antibody, achieved sustained control of MAS and facilitated rapid tapering of glucocorticoids (GCs) in a phase 2 pilot study (NCT03311854). This analysis presents data by MAS presentation from an expanded population of patients treated with emapalumab for MAS in Still’s disease.

Methods: Data were pooled from 2 open-label, single-arm interventional studies (NI-0501-06 [NCT03311854] and NI-0501-14 [EMERALD; NCT05001737]) in patients with MAS in Still’s disease who had an inadequate response to high-dose GCs or investigator-assessed rapid worsening of clinical condition and/or laboratory parameters. All patients were administered a loading dose of emapalumab 6 mg/kg via intravenous infusion on Day 1; emapalumab 3 mg/kg was then administered every 3 days from Days 4–16 and twice weekly from Days 17–28 (or longer for insufficient clinical response). The primary efficacy endpoint was complete response (CR) at Week 8 (MAS clinical activity score measured on a 10 cm visual analog scale [VAS] ≤1/10 cm) and normalization of 7 MAS-related laboratory parameters. Partial response (PR) was defined as VAS < 4 cm and normalization of ≥3 abnormal baseline laboratory parameters included in the composite primary endpoint. MAS was classified as classic (first MAS diagnosis secondary to an earlier Still’s diagnosis), diagnosed at onset of Still’s disease or recurrent. MAS subgroup data was collected prospectively in EMERALD and retrospectively using patient narratives for NCT03311854.

Results: 39 patients were enrolled (31 [79.5%] females), with a median age of 12 years (range, 9 months–64 years). 84.6% of patients received concomitant biologics alone or in combination, mainly anti-interleukin-1 (66.6%) and cyclosporine A (43.6%). Twenty patients (51.3%) had MAS at Still’s disease onset, 5 (12.8%) patients had classical MAS, and 14 (35.9%) had recurrent MAS. A higher proportion of patients in EMERALD had recurrent MAS compared with NI-0501-06 (10/25 [40.0%] vs 4/14 [28.7%]) and a lesser proportion had classical MAS (2/25 [8.0%] vs 3/14 [21.4%]). CR (54.5–60.0%) and VAS ≤1 cm (76.9–100%) rates were similar across groups (Figures 1 and 2). While the recurrent group had the highest rates of non-responders at Week 8, overall response (OR) rates were still high with 8/11 patients (72.7%) achieving an OR at Week 8 and 10/13 (76.9%) achieving VAS ≤1 cm at Week 8. Changes in GC dosing from baseline to Week 8 were similar across MAS subgroups (Figure 3). Emapalumab was well tolerated. One patient with MAS at diagnosis of Still’s disease and one patient with recurrent MAS died during the study.

Conclusion: Emapalumab treatment was associated with consistent CR rates of approximately 55–60% among patients with different MAS presentations, who had an inadequate response to high-dose GCs, including patients with recurrent disease. Patients achieving VAS ≤1 cm, changes in GC dosing and safety were also similar across MAS subgroups.

Supporting image 1Figure 1. Week 8 responder status* by presentation subgroup amongst patients with MAS in Still’s disease with an inadequate response to high-dose GCs

Supporting image 2Figure 2. Prevalence of VAS ≤1 cm† at Week 8 by presentation subgroup amongst patients with MAS in Still’s disease with an inadequate response to high-dose GCs

Supporting image 3Figure 3. Change in GC dosing over time in patients treated with emapalumab from different MAS subgroups who had an inadequate response to high-dose GCs


Disclosures: A. GROM: National Institutes of Health, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, sJIA Foundation, 5, Sobi, 2, 5, Up-To-Date, 9; S. Vastert: Novartis, 2, 6, Sobi, 2, 5, 6; J. anton: Sobi, 1, 5, 6; P. Quartier: AbbVie, 2, 6, Chugai-Roche, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Sanofi, 1, 2, Sobi, 2, 6; B. Fautrel: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, Celltrion, 2, Chugai, 2, Eli Lilly & Co., 2, 5, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Galapagos, 2, Janssen, 2, Medac, 2, MSD, 2, 5, Nordic Pharma, 2, Novartis, 2, OW KIN, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Roche, 2, Sandoz, 2, Sanofi-Genzyme, 2, SOBI, 2, UCB, 2, Viatris, 2; P. Brogan: Sobi, 6; E. Behrens: Ab2Bio, 5, Sobi, 2, 5, UpToDate, 9; M. Elder: None; F. Minoia: Novartis, 2, 6, Sobi, 2, 6; P. Dolezalova: Medac, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6, Sobi, 6; R. Biesen: None; M. Shimizu: Medical and Biological Laboratories Co. Ltd, 5; U. Ullmann: Sobi, 2; A. Mahmood: Sobi, 2; A. Danquah: Sobi, 3; E. Burillo: Sobi, 3; M. Petrimpol: Sobi, 3; S. Mallett: Sobi, 2; B. Jamieson: Sobi Inc, 3; F. De Benedetti: AbbVie, 2, 5, Apollo, 2, 5, Elixiron, 2, 5, Kiniksa, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Sanofi, 2, 5, Sobi, 2, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

GROM A, Vastert S, anton J, Quartier P, Fautrel B, Brogan P, Behrens E, Elder M, Minoia F, Dolezalova P, Biesen R, Shimizu M, Ullmann U, Mahmood A, Danquah A, Burillo E, Petrimpol M, Mallett S, Jamieson B, De Benedetti F. Emapalumab Treatment for Patients with Differing Presentations of Macrophage Activation Syndrome (MAS) Secondary to Still’s Disease: Results from a Pooled Analysis of Two Prospective Trials [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/emapalumab-treatment-for-patients-with-differing-presentations-of-macrophage-activation-syndrome-mas-secondary-to-stills-disease-results-from-a-pooled-analysis-of-two-prospective-trials/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/emapalumab-treatment-for-patients-with-differing-presentations-of-macrophage-activation-syndrome-mas-secondary-to-stills-disease-results-from-a-pooled-analysis-of-two-prospective-trials/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology