ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1542

Alternative Definitions of Moderate Flares That Simulate Clinical Practice in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Post Hoc Exploration of Moderate Flares in Patients Treated with Dapirolizumab Pegol in a 48-Week Phase 3 Trial

Richard Furie1, George Bertsias2, Lucy Carter3, Eric Morand4, Marta Mosca5, Marilyn Pike6, Vanessa Taieb7, Annette Nelde8, Ed Vital9 and Christian Stach10, 1Division of Rheumatology, Northwell Health, Great Neck, NY, 2Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University Hospital of Heraklion and University of Crete Medical School and Foundation for Research and Technology-Hellas (FORTH), Infections and Immunity, Institute of Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Heraklion, Greece, 3Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 4Centre for Inflammatory Diseases, Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 5University of Pisa, Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 6Rheumatology, MedPharm Consulting, Inc., Bethesda, MD, 7UCB, Colombes, France, 8Biogen, Baar, Switzerland, 9University of Leeds, Leeds, England, United Kingdom, 10UCB, Monheim am Rhein, Germany

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Randomized Trial, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, October 27, 2025

Title: (1517–1552) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Despite the evolution of various flare definitions and their inclusion in SLE clinical trials, moderate flares tend to be underestimated in trials owing to their evaluation based on a single time interval as opposed to multiple intervals. Dapirolizumab pegol (DZP) is a novel CD40L inhibitor with broad modulatory effects on SLE immunopathology;1,2 it consists of a polyethylene glycol (PEG)-conjugated antigen-binding fragment (Fab’), which lacks an Fc domain. In the phase 3 PHOENYCS GO trial (NCT04294667) of DZP in SLE, the primary endpoint, BILAG-based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA) response at Week (Wk) 48, was met.3 Additionally, through Wk 48, a lower proportion of patients (pts) receiving DZP plus standard of care (DZP+SOC) vs placebo (PBO)+SOC had BILAG 2004 severe flares (11.6% vs 23.4%; nominal p=0.0257).3 We report moderate flare outcomes from PHOENYCS GO and explore alternative definitions to more accurately estimate their frequency.

Methods: PHOENYCS GO was a 48-wk, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial. Pts were randomized 2:1 to intravenous DZP 24 mg/kg+SOC or PBO+SOC every 4 wks. Pre-specified analyses defined a BILAG 2004 severe flare as ≥1 BILAG 2004 Grade A due to a new/worse individual item(s), and a BILAG 2004 moderate flare as ≥2 BILAG 2004 Grade Bs due to new/worse individual items in different organ systems at the same visit. Post hoc analyses included two alternative definitions of BILAG 2004 moderate flares that allowed for ≥2 BILAG 2004 Grade Bs due to new/worse individual items in different organ systems to occur across either: (1) up to 2 consecutive visits and (2) up to 3 consecutive visits, all visits 4 wks apart (Figure 1).

Results: Baseline characteristics are presented in the Table. At Wk 48, by the pre-specified definition, 13.9% (29/208) vs 20.6% (22/107) of pts receiving DZP+SOC vs PBO+SOC, respectively, had BILAG 2004 moderate flares. By alternative definition 1, BILAG 2004 moderate flares occurred in 15.4% (32/208) vs 29.0% (31/107) of pts receiving DZP+SOC vs PBO+SOC, respectively. By alternative definition 2, BILAG 2004 moderate flares occurred in 16.8% (35/208) vs 33.6% (36/107) of pts receiving DZP+SOC vs PBO+SOC, respectively (Figure 2). Time to BILAG 2004 moderate/severe flares through Wk 48 was shorter for pts receiving DZP+SOC vs PBO+SOC by all definitions.

Conclusion: Pts treated with DZP+SOC had fewer BILAG 2004 moderate flares, by all definitions considered, vs those treated with PBO+SOC. When allowing for longer time intervals over consecutive visits to evaluate moderate flares with the alternative definitions, greater rates of BILAG 2004 moderate flares were observed, particularly for pts receiving PBO+SOC, and greater differentiation between DZP+SOC and PBO+SOC was also observed. These results confirm a need to re-evaluate how flares are captured in SLE clinical trials; the alternative definitions of flares explored may better simulate clinical practice than the native definition of BILAG 2004 moderate flares.References: 1. Powlesland AS. Annals Rheum Dis 2024;83 (suppl 1):261; 2. Cutcutache I. Arthritis Rheumatol 2023;75 (suppl 9); 3. Clowse M. Arthritis Rheumatol 2024;76 (suppl 9).

Supporting image 1Table. Baseline demographics and disease characteristics

Supporting image 2Figure 1. Pre-specified and alternative definitions of BILAG 2004 moderate flares  

Supporting image 3Figure 2. Cumulative occurrence of BILAG 2004 moderate flares across definitions


Disclosures: R. Furie: Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 2, 12, Investigator, Genentech, Inc., 2, 12, Investigator, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), 2, 5, Kyverna Therapeutics, 12, Investigator, Merck/MSD, 2, Novartis, 2, 12, Investigator, Regeneron, 2; G. Bertsias: AbbVie, 6, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 5, Novartis, 2, 6, Otsuka, 6, Pfizer, 6; L. Carter: Alumis Inc., 12, Paid instructor, UCB, 2; E. Morand: AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 1, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 1, 2, 5, 6, Bristol Meyers Squibb, 1, 2, 5, 6, Dragonfly, 1, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 1, 2, 5, 6, EMD Serono, 1, 2, 5, 6, Genentech, 5, GSK, 1, 2, 5, 6, Johnson & Johnson, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Quell, 1, 2, 6, Remegen, 1, 2, 6, Takeda, 5, UCB, 1, 2, 5, Zenas, 1, 2, 6; M. Mosca: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, Eli Lilly, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Idorsia, 2, Milteny, 2, Novartis, 2, Otsuka, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; M. Pike: AstraZeneca, 2, BMS, 2, UCB, 2; V. Taieb: UCB, 3, 12, Shareholder; A. Nelde: Biogen, 3, 12, Shareholder; E. Vital: AbbVie, 2, 6, Alpine, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, 6, Aurinia, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Idorsia, 6, ILTOO Pharma, 6, Merck, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, 12, Paid instructor, Otsuka, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 5, 6, Sandoz, 5, UCB, 2, 6; C. Stach: UCB, 3, 12, Shareholder.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Furie R, Bertsias G, Carter L, Morand E, Mosca M, Pike M, Taieb V, Nelde A, Vital E, Stach C. Alternative Definitions of Moderate Flares That Simulate Clinical Practice in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Post Hoc Exploration of Moderate Flares in Patients Treated with Dapirolizumab Pegol in a 48-Week Phase 3 Trial [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/alternative-definitions-of-moderate-flares-that-simulate-clinical-practice-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-post-hoc-exploration-of-moderate-flares-in-patients-treated-with-dapirolizumab-pegol-in-a-48/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/alternative-definitions-of-moderate-flares-that-simulate-clinical-practice-in-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-post-hoc-exploration-of-moderate-flares-in-patients-treated-with-dapirolizumab-pegol-in-a-48/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology