ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0662

Efficacy Across Baseline Characteristic Subgroups in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated With Upadacitinib: Results From SLEek, a Phase 2 Randomized

Marta Mosca1, Karen H. Costenbader2, Amit Saxena3, Michelle Petri4, Andrea Rubbert-Roth5, Karim Masri6, Christopher Saffore7, Ling Cheng8 and Joan Merrill9, 1University of Pisa, Pisa, Pisa, Italy, 2Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 3Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 4Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Timonium, MD, 5Division of Rheumatology and Immunology, Cantonal Hospital St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland, 6AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 7AbbVie Inc., waukegan, IL, 8AbbVie, North, IL, 9Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City 73104, OK

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0641–0670) Systemic Lupus Erythematosus – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Clinical and immunological manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) vary widely across patients, complicating diagnosis and treatment (1,2). Upadacitinib (UPA), an oral selective JAK inhibitor, significantly reduced disease activity compared with placebo (PBO) in the phase 2 SLEek trial of adult patients with moderately to severely active SLE (3). In this analysis, we evaluate potential differences in treatment responses to UPA vs PBO associated with baseline patient characteristics.

Methods: SLEek was a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, PBO-controlled trial (NCT03978520) (3). This post hoc analysis included participants who were randomized to receive once-daily UPA 30 mg or PBO for 48 weeks. We report the proportions of trial participants in each group who met the composite measures of disease improvement, Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and/or British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment (BICLA). Participants were stratified into subgroups by sex, age, race, region, body mass index, medication use, clinical markers, and medical history. Missing data were handled with nonresponder imputation incorporating multiple imputation to handle missing data due to COVID-19. Between-group differences and 95% CIs were estimated according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for baseline corticosteroid use (≤10 mg or >10 mg), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score at screening (< 10 or ≥10), baseline interferon score (high, low, or not applicable), and baseline immunosuppressant use (yes or no). Analyses were exploratory, and the reported data are descriptive.

Results: A total of 137 participants (UPA 30 mg, n = 62; PBO, n = 75) were included. Most participants were White (56.2%) and female (96.4%). As previously published, at week 48, 31 participants (50.0%) treated with UPA 30 mg and 18 (24.0%) treated with PBO achieved LLDAS; 33 participants (53.2%) treated with UPA 30 mg and 19 (25.3%) treated with PBO achieved BICLA (3). A numerically higher proportion of participants in most baseline characteristic subgroups treated with UPA 30 mg vs PBO achieved LLDAS and/or BICLA (Table), with treatment differences (estimated by the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test) consistent with potential benefits of UPA 30 mg across most subgroups (Figure).

Conclusion: After 48 weeks of treatment, participants with SLE treated with UPA30 mg were more likely than those receiving PBO to achieve LLDAS and/or BICLA across various baseline demographics and clinical characteristics; however, the interpretation of data in this study is limited by sample size. These findings, if corroborated in further studies, may support the potential benefit of UPA in a broad spectrum of patients with SLE despite the heterogeneity of the disorder.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2anti-dsDNA, anti–double-stranded DNA; BICLA, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment; BMI, body mass index; LLDAS, Lupus Low Disease Activity State; NA, not applicable; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000.

aPercentage of responders with available data on LLDAS or BICLA.

Supporting image 3anti-dsDNA, anti–double-stranded DNA; BICLA, British Isles Lupus Assessment Group-Based Composite Lupus Assessment; BMI, body mass index; LLDAS, Lupus Low Disease Activity State; NA, not applicable; SLEDAI-2K, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000.

Response rate differences and 95% CIs were estimated according to the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusted for baseline corticosteroid use (≤10 mg or >10 mg), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 score at screening ( < 10 or ≥10), baseline interferon score (high, low, or not applicable), and baseline immunosuppressant use (yes or no).


Disclosures: M. Mosca: AbbVie, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 6, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, Eli Lilly, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Idorsia, 2, Milteny, 2, Novartis, 2, Otsuka, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6; K. Costenbader: AbbVie, 2, 5, Bain, 2, 5, Biogen, 2, 5, Brigham & Women’s Hospital, 3, GSK, 2, 5; A. Saxena: AbbVie, 1, Amgen, 1, AstraZeneca, 1, Aurinia, 1, Bristol Myers Squibb, 1, Eli Lilly and Company, 1, Genentech, 1, GSK, 1, Kezar Life Sciences, 1, Synthekine, 1, UCB, 2, 5; M. Petri: Amgen, 2, AnaptysBio, 2, Annexon Bio, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Atara Biosciences, 2, Aurinia, 2, 5, Autolus, 2, Bain Capital, 2, Baobab Therapeutics, 2, Biocryst, 2, Biogen, 2, Boxer Capital, 2, Cabaletto Bio, 2, Caribou Biosciences, 2, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, 2, CVS Health, 2, Dualitybio, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, EMD Serono, 2, Emergent, 2, Escient Pharmaceuticals, 2, Exagen, 5, Exo Therapeutics, 2, Gentibio, 2, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, 5, iCell Gene Therapeutics, 2, Innovaderm Research, 2, IQVIA, 2, Janssen, 5, Kezar Life Sciences, 2, Kira Pharmaceuticals, 2, Nexstone Immunology, 2, Nimbus Lakshmi, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono Pharma, 2, PPD Development, 2, Proviant, 2, Regeneron, 2, Seismic Therapeutic, 2, Senti Biosciences, 2, Sinomab Biosciences, 2, Steritas, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenet Medicines, 2, TG Therapeutics, 2, UCB, 2, Variant Bio, 2, Worldwide Clinical Trials, 2, Zydus, 2; A. Rubbert-Roth: AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, BMS, 2, 6, Boehringer, 2, 6, Chugai, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 6, Janssen, 2, 6, Novartis, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, Roche, 2, 6, Sanofi, 2, 6; K. Masri: AbbVie, 3, 11; C. Saffore: AbbVie, 3, 11; L. Cheng: AbbVie/Abbott, 3, 11; J. Merrill: AbbVie, 2, Alexion, 2, Almiral, 2, Alumis, 2, Amgen, 2, AstraZeneca, 2, 5, Aurinia, 2, Biogen, 2, BMS, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, EMD Serono, 2, Equillium, 2, Genentech, 2, Gilead, 2, GSK, 2, 5, Kezar, 2, Merck, 2, Novartis, 2, Ono, 2, Remegen, 2, Sanofi, 2, Takeda, 2, Tenent, 2, UCB, 2, Veloxis, 2, Zenas, 2.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mosca M, Costenbader K, Saxena A, Petri M, Rubbert-Roth A, Masri K, Saffore C, Cheng L, Merrill J. Efficacy Across Baseline Characteristic Subgroups in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treated With Upadacitinib: Results From SLEek, a Phase 2 Randomized [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-across-baseline-characteristic-subgroups-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-treated-with-upadacitinib-results-from-sleek-a-phase-2-randomized/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-across-baseline-characteristic-subgroups-in-patients-with-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-treated-with-upadacitinib-results-from-sleek-a-phase-2-randomized/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology