ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0572

Real-World Treat-to-Target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis: 48-week Results from the MONITOR-PsA Cohort

Jean-Guillaume Letarouilly1, Elnaz Saeedi2, Raphaël Hurtubise3, Lija James4, Nicola Gullick5, Deepak Jadon6, William Tillett7, Yvonne Sinomati4, Laura Tucker4, Nadia Mian8, Sophia Massa3 and Laura Coates9, 1Université de Lille, CHU Lille, Service de rhumatologie, Lille, France, LILLE, Nord-Pas-de-Calais, France, 2Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Oxford, 3Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK., Oxford, United Kingdom, 4Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, UK, Oxford, United Kingdom, 5Rheumatology Department, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Coventry, UK, Coventry, United Kingdom, 6Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 7Department of Life Sciences, Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom, 8BM BS, MMedSc,, Oxford, United Kingdom, 9Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: clinical trial, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0554–0592) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: A treat-to-target (T2T) strategy in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is supported by International PsA recommendations but not widely practiced in clinic. The aim of the Multicentre Observational Initiative in Treat-to-Target Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis (MONITOR-PsA) cohort was to assess clinical and patient-reported outcomes with a pragmatic implementation of a T2T approach.

Methods: Adult patients from 11 UK rheumatology departments were included if they had a clinical diagnosis of active PsA ( ≥ 1 tender or swollen joints or enthesis); not previously had treated with DMARDs for articular disease. The MONITOR-PsA cohort patients were assessed every 12 weeks for one year and were treated with current standard step-up care. Initial treatment consisted of methotrexate, then the addition of or switch to another csDMARD, and then potentially a switch to a bDMARD dependent on disease activity(Figure 1). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients achieving the PsA Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) ‘good’ response at 48 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were the proportion achieving PASDAS moderate response at 48 weeks and PASDAS continuous outcome 48 weeks. Exploratory outcomes included the proportion achieving MDA and DAPSA remission (≤4) at 48 weeks, the number of patients achieving a 50% decrease in 50% in dactylitis/enthesitis scores, the proportion achieving PSAID patient acceptable symptom state (≤4) and the difference between baseline and 48 weeks for radiographic outcomes (score of erosions, joint space narrowing score, modified Sharp-van der Heijde score).

Results: We recruited 300 patients, 197 with polyarticular PsA and 103 with oligoarticular (< 4 active joints) PsA from 18th April 2018 to 23rd August 2022. Sixty-six patients were in an embedded trial of intensive medication, so the analysis population consisted of 234 patients receiving step-up T2T care. At baseline, PsA was moderately active with a median PASDAS of 5.1 [4.1, 5.8] and a median DAPSA of 23.2 [16.0, 31.9], and 19.7% of patients had structural damage (Table). At 48 weeks, 77/234 patients (33.0%) were treated with methotrexate alone and 45/234 (19.0%) were treated with bDMARDs, mainly TNFi (38/45; 84.5%) (Figure 2). The proportion of patients achieving the PASDAS ‘moderate’ and ‘good’ responses at 48 weeks were 49/146 (33.6%) and 54/146 (37.0%), respectively. DAPSA remission and MDA were achieved in 35/107 (32.7%) and 70/147 (47.6%) patients at 48 weeks, respectively. 37/54 (68.5%) and 68/119 (57.1%) of patients achieved a 50% decrease in dactylitis and enthesitis counts, respectively. The majority of patients (117/168 or 69.6%) achieved PSAID patient acceptable symptom state (≤4). No structural progression was noted from baseline to 48 weeks.

Conclusion: In this pragmatic routine implementation of a T2T approach, we report results close to the T2T outcomes in the TICOPA trial (a PASDAS ‘good’ response, 37.0% vs 46% and or a PASDAS ‘moderate’ response 33.6% vs 33%), respectively MONITOR-PsA vs TICOPA), suggesting that a pragmatic T2T approach can be implemented with good outcomes in routine practice.

Supporting image 1Table 1

Supporting image 2Figure 1 Treat to target strategy

Supporting image 3Figure 2 – Medication use in the MONITOR cohort


Disclosures: J. Letarouilly: AbbVie/Abbott, 6, Amgen, 6, Biogen, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Galapagos, 6, Janssen, 6, Nordic Pharma, 6, Novartis, 6, Pfizer, 6; E. Saeedi: None; R. Hurtubise: Biojamp, 6, Celltrion, 6, UCB, 6; L. James: None; N. Gullick: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Alfasigma, 2, AstraZeneca, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, UCB, 2, 5, 6; D. Jadon: None; W. Tillett: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, BMS, 2, 5, 6, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, MSD, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Ono Pharma, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Takeda, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6; Y. Sinomati: None; L. Tucker: None; N. Mian: None; S. Massa: None; L. Coates: AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Biogen, 6, BMS, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Celgene, 2, 5, 6, Domain, 2, Eli Lilly and Company, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 6, Gilead, 2, 5, 6, GSK, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Medac, 6, MoonLake Immunotherapeutics, 2, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, UCB, 2, 5, 6.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Letarouilly J, Saeedi E, Hurtubise R, James L, Gullick N, Jadon D, Tillett W, Sinomati Y, Tucker L, Mian N, Massa S, Coates L. Real-World Treat-to-Target Strategy in Psoriatic Arthritis: 48-week Results from the MONITOR-PsA Cohort [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treat-to-target-strategy-in-psoriatic-arthritis-48-week-results-from-the-monitor-psa-cohort/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/real-world-treat-to-target-strategy-in-psoriatic-arthritis-48-week-results-from-the-monitor-psa-cohort/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology