ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0556

Evaluating the Efficacy of Sulfasalazine Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rameez Qasim1, Khadija Mohib2, Umme Abeeha Naqvi3, Ahmad Furqan Anjum4 and Moeeza Fatima4, 1Allama Iqbal Medical College Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan, 2Kirk Kerkorian School of Medicine at UNLV, Las Vegas, NV, 3Jinnah Sindh Medical University Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan, 4Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Medical College, Shaikh Zayed Postgraduate Medical Institute (SZPGMI), Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0554–0592) Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: Available evidence hints towards the positive results of the use of sulfasalazine in the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the possible safety and effectiveness of sulfasalazine for the treatment of PsA.

Methods: We conducted a thorough literature search using PubMed and Cochrane Library to retrieve and review all the articles through July 2024. Each of the studies in our review was to report different measures to determine the safety and efficacy of sulfasalazine by using 95% CIs. PRISMA flow guidelines were followed and used to assess the methodological quality of evidence and reporting Quality. The GRADE system was used to appraise the certainty of evidence.

Results: Our literature search produced 17 results and a final of 3 studies were included in our analysis. All the studies were prospective RCTs with a total population of 380 patients with male dominant population. There was a significant and persistent treatment effect on ESR, as evidenced by the overall standardized mean difference (SMD) of -0.47 (95% CI: [-0.68, -0.26], Z = 4.41, P < 0.0001) and low heterogeneity (Chi² = 1.88, P = 0.39, I² = 0%). The overall pooled mean difference was found to be -1.09 (95% CI: -2.95 to 0.77) and a p-value of 0.25 in case of Ritchie Index, showing no statistically significant benefit of Sulfasalazine over placebo. Based on the three studies included, overall effect size was found to be -0.13 (95% CI: -0.34 to 0.08), showing no notable variation among the groups. Heterogeneity was low (I² = 0%, p = 0.93), and thus result was not statistically important (Z = 1.23, p = 0.22). Two of the studied showed a low risk of bias where as one showed a high risk.

Conclusion: Sulfasalazine has some benefits in reducing systemic inflammation in people with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as shown by an improved erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). However, its efficacy as a stand-alone treatment is limited due to its negligible effect on important clinical symptoms such as joint pain, stiffness, and soreness. For mild to moderate PsA, sulfasalazine may be helpful as adjuvant therapy, but in more severe instances, it is not enough for complete management. To elucidate its function in PsA management, more studies involving bigger and more varied populations are required.

Supporting image 1Forest Plot of effect on Morning Stiffness

Supporting image 2Forest Plot of effect on Ritchie Articular Index

Supporting image 3Forest Plot of effect on ESR


Disclosures: R. Qasim: None; K. Mohib: None; U. Naqvi: None; A. Anjum: None; M. Fatima: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Qasim R, Mohib K, Naqvi U, Anjum A, Fatima M. Evaluating the Efficacy of Sulfasalazine Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-efficacy-of-sulfasalazine-compared-to-placebo-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-in-adults-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluating-the-efficacy-of-sulfasalazine-compared-to-placebo-in-the-treatment-of-psoriatic-arthritis-in-adults-a-systematic-review-and-meta-analysis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology