ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0790

Diabetes Risk in Psoriasis Patients Treated with Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Target Trial Emulation Using Nationwide Data

Arjun Mahajan1, David Bates2, Vinod Nambudiri3, Avery LaChance2, Jeffrey Sparks4 and Evan Piette3, 1Harvard Medical School, Boston, 2Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 3Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, 4Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: Biologicals, Dermatology, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: Abstracts: Patient Outcomes, Preferences, & Attitudes (0789–0794)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 1:15PM-1:30PM

Background/Purpose: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease associated with increased risk of metabolic complications, such as diabetes mellitus. However, the impact of specific biologic DMARD therapies on these metabolic outcomes remains poorly understood. Importantly, understanding how psoriatic treatments affect metabolic outcomes may guide therapeutic choices; thus, this study evaluates the risks of diabetes and kidney disease across biologic DMARD therapies.

Methods: Utilizing data from 128 healthcare organizations in the TriNetX network (2016-2024), we conducted an emulated trial to evaluate diabetes-related disease incidence among psoriasis patients (n=20,120) treated with interleukin-23 (IL-23i), interleukin-17A (IL-17Ai), or tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFi) inhibitors. To emulate randomization, we applied 1:1 propensity score matching using a greedy nearest neighbor algorithm to balance cohorts on demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, and medication use (Table 1). Primary outcomes included new-onset type 2 diabetes, diabetic nephropathy, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and stage 3–5 CKD. Varicose vein and head laceration diagnoses served as negative control outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models.

Results: In an emulated trial of IL-23i versus TNFi treatment (n=6,457 matched pairs), IL-23i treatment was associated with lower risks of diabetes (HR 0.91; 95% CI 0.75–0.99), diabetic nephropathy (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.48–0.98), and stage 3–5 CKD (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58–0.98) (Table 2). In the TNFi versus IL-17Ai emulated trial (n=6,425 pairs), TNFi-treated patients had a higher risk of diabetes (HR 1.16; 95% CI 1.01–1.22) and associated kidney disease outcomes. No significant differences were observed between IL-23i and IL-17Ai treatment. Compared to systemic therapy naïve (STN) patients (n=6,489 pairs), IL-23i treatment was associated with reduced risks of diabetes (HR 0.89; 95% CI 0.80–0.98), diabetic nephropathy (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.60–0.97), and stage 3–5 CKD (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.62–0.92) (Table 3); IL-17Ai treatment showed similarly protective effects for diabetes (HR 0.90; 95% CI 0.83–0.98), diabetic nephropathy (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.57–0.96), and stage 3–5 CKD (HR 0.88; 95% CI 0.75–0.99) risk (n=6,402 pairs). TNFi treatment showed no significant differences compared to STN patients. No differences were observed in negative control outcomes across comparisons.

Conclusion: These emulated target trials suggest that IL-17Ai and IL-23i therapies are associated with lower risks of incident type 2 diabetes and kidney disease compared to TNFi or systemic therapy naïve approaches. These findings may support the consideration of metabolic outcomes in biologic DMARD treatment selection for psoriasis patients.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: A. Mahajan: None; D. Bates: None; V. Nambudiri: None; A. LaChance: Johnson & Johnson, 2, johnson and johnson, 2, Merck, 5, Pfizer, 2; J. Sparks: Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), 5, Janssen, 5; E. Piette: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mahajan A, Bates D, Nambudiri V, LaChance A, Sparks J, Piette E. Diabetes Risk in Psoriasis Patients Treated with Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs: Target Trial Emulation Using Nationwide Data [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diabetes-risk-in-psoriasis-patients-treated-with-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-target-trial-emulation-using-nationwide-data/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/diabetes-risk-in-psoriasis-patients-treated-with-biologic-disease-modifying-antirheumatic-drugs-target-trial-emulation-using-nationwide-data/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology