ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2025
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • 2020-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0741

Characteristics of African American vs. Non-African American Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Dana Nachawati1, Milad Heydari-Kamjani2, Keri Ann Pfeil1, Elleson Harper1, Meghan Gump1, Lindsay Frumker1, Ansaam Daoud3 and Omer Pamuk2, 1University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 2University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center/ Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 3Case Western Reserve University/University Hospitals, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2025

Keywords: giant cell arteritis, race/ethnicity

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, October 26, 2025

Title: (0731–0764) Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated & Related Disorders Poster I

Session Type: Poster Session A

Session Time: 10:30AM-12:30PM

Background/Purpose: GCA is a vasculitis of large and medium-sized arteries that has been well-studied in populations of European descent; however, data on African American (AA) patients remain sparse. We aimed to assess racial differences in demographics, comorbidities, treatment, inflammatory markers, and outcomes in GCA.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using TriNetX, a network of de-identified electronic medical records from 102 healthcare organizations. Adults with GCA (ICD-10-CM: M31.5, M31.6) from 2004–2024 were grouped as AA or non-African American (non-AA) (including White, Asian, Hispanic, and others). After 1:1 propensity score matching (33 covariates), cohorts were compared for comorbidities, treatments, inflammatory markers (CRP,ESR at 0/6/12 months), and mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression were used for survival analysis.

Results: 6,507 AA and 40,683 non-AA patients were identified; after matching, 6,505 remained in each group. AA patients were younger at diagnosis (65.1 vs 68.9 years, p< 0.001) and more likely to be female (79 vs.67%, p < 0.001). Hypertension (HTN) and diabetes (DM) were more prevalent in AA, while PMR, anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (AION), and aortic aneurysms were more common in non-AA individuals. Prednisone, MTX, and tocilizumab were comparable between groups (Table 1).After matching and at baseline, CRP was lower in AA than non-AA patients (25.4 vs. 32.7 mg/L, p< 0.001), while ESR was higher (54.5 vs. 42.6 mm/h, p< 0.001). Notably, AA patients continued to exhibit higher ESR and CRP levels at 6 and 12 months (Table 2).Survival analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in mortality between the two groups (Figure 1). Mortality risk was 11.9% in AA vs. 14.3% in non-AA, a difference of –2.4% (p < 0.001). The risk ratio was 0.833 and the odds ratio was 0.811, suggesting a 17–19% relative risk reduction. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed higher survival probability in AA patients (50.44% vs. 36.05%; p = 0.001). Cox regression showed a 14.4% lower mortality hazard (hazard ratio 0.856), with the proportional hazards assumption met.

Conclusion: In our study, AA patients with GCA were younger and more often female at diagnosis compared to non-AA patients. Comorbid HTN and DM were more common in the AA group, while PMR, AION, and aortic aneurysms were more prevalent in the non-AA group. Despite higher inflammatory markers, AA patients had lower mortality and improved survival than other races in this matched cohort. Variations in disease phenotype, comorbidity burden, healthcare access, or other clinical and sociodemographic factors may drive these differences. Further investigation is warranted to explore potential contributors to these outcome differences.

Supporting image 1Table 1. Characteristics of African American cohort versus non-African American cohort

Supporting image 2Table 2. Inflammatory marker analysis at time of diagnosis, 6 months, 12 months in African American cohort versus non-African American cohort after matching

Supporting image 3Figure 1. Kaplan-Meier Survival Analysis of Mortality in African American versus non-African American Patient’s with GCA. Key: Purple = African American cohort. Green = non-African American cohort


Disclosures: D. Nachawati: None; M. Heydari-Kamjani: None; K. Pfeil: None; E. Harper: None; M. Gump: None; L. Frumker: None; A. Daoud: None; O. Pamuk: None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Nachawati D, Heydari-Kamjani M, Pfeil K, Harper E, Gump M, Frumker L, Daoud A, Pamuk O. Characteristics of African American vs. Non-African American Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: A Retrospective Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2025; 77 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characteristics-of-african-american-vs-non-african-american-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-a-retrospective-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2025

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/characteristics-of-african-american-vs-non-african-american-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis-a-retrospective-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

Embargo Policy

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM CT on October 25. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology