ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1338

Time To Institution Of Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs In Australian Patients With Early Rheumatoid Arthritis

Sharon Van Doornum1, Joanne Tropea2, Mark Tacey1 and Danny Liew1, 1Melbourne EpiCentre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, 2Melbourne EpiCentre, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis - Clinical Aspects II: Predictors of Disease Course in Rheumatoid Arthritis - Treatment Approaches

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:

Early introduction of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) has been shown to reduce joint destruction and long-term disability in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Substantial and irreversible harm can occur as little as 12 weeks after onset of symptoms.  Recent international studies have examined time to institution of DMARD in early RA, with median delays of between 13 and 36 weeks. The aim of the present study was to examine the time to DMARD therapy in Australian patients with early RA.

Methods:

The study included patients referred to a metropolitan tertiary hospital and to 14 community-based rheumatologists in Australia. The hospital-based patients were identified retrospectively via hospital records and included patients with early RA who were first seen between January 2008 and October 2012. Medical charts were reviewed and, if necessary, the local doctor contacted for additional information. The community-based patients were recruited via the treating rheumatologists and data were collected prospectively by the rheumatologists over the period February 2012 to April 2013.  Data recorded included dates of symptom onset, initial local doctor consultation, referral to rheumatologist, rheumatologist review and commencement of DMARD. Serologic status and first DMARD commenced were also noted.

Results:

One hundred and thirty five patients (66% female, mean±SD age 55±16 years) were identified and contributed data. RhF and/or ACPA was positive in 66% (n=89) of patients. The median time from symptom onset to initiation of DMARD therapy was 163 days (inter-quartile range (IQR) 88-323). The median time from referral to first rheumatology appointment was 33 days (IQR 9-55) and from first rheumatology appointment to DMARD commencement was 0 days (range 0-22). The major component of the delay comprised the time from symptom onset to referral to the rheumatologist, for which the median duration was 98 days (range 51-239).  Stratified analysis did not reveal any substantial differences in delays between hospital-based and community-based patients. However, among hospital-based patients, ACPA positive status resulted in more rapid commencement of DMARD therapy (median 35 vs 93 days from time of referral, p=0.014). The first DMARD commenced was methotrexate monotherapy in 61% (n=82) of patients and methotrexate combination therapy in 5% (n=7) of patients.

Conclusion:

As noted in other countries, there are considerable delays in the commencement of DMARD therapy for Australian patients with early RA.  A substantial component of the delay is prior to the referral of the patient by the local doctor for rheumatologist review.


Disclosure:

S. Van Doornum,

AbbVie Pty Ltd,

2;

J. Tropea,
None;

M. Tacey,
None;

D. Liew,

Abbvie Australia,

2,

Abbvie Australia,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/time-to-institution-of-disease-modifying-anti-rheumatic-drugs-in-australian-patients-with-early-rheumatoid-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology