ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1588

Poor Adherence To Medications For Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Among U.S. Medicaid Beneficiaries

Jinoos Yazdany1, Jun Liu2, Graciela S. Alarcon3, Karen H. Costenbader4 and Candace H. Feldman5, 1Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 2Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, Boston, CA, 3Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 4Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 5Rheumatology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and treatment

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus - Clinical Aspects II: Central Nervous System Manifestations, Therapeutics

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose:   Immunosuppressive and anti-malarial drugs are the cornerstones of treatment for patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and have been shown to improve outcomes, including reduced disease activity, damage and mortality.  We examined adherence to treatment with these medications in a nationwide study of Medicaid beneficiaries with SLE.

Methods: We used U.S. Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX) data from 2000-2006 containing person-level files on Medicaid eligibility, utilization and payments.  We identified patients meeting a validated administrative SLE definition, who had received either an immunosuppressive (oral cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil, mycophenolic acid, azathioprine, leflunomide, methotrexate, or tacrolimus) or anti-malarial (hydroxychloroquine) drug through an outpatient pharmacy over the period of observation.  Pharmacy claims were used to assess adherence to drugs by calculating a medication possession ratio (MPR), defined as the proportion of days covered by the total days’ supply dispensed after the first claim for each drug.  We observed each patient over a fixed interval of 180 days to ensure all patients were studied for the same time interval.  Data were stratified by sociodemographic characteristics and geographic region and we used Fisher’s exact test to compare MPRs between groups.  In addition, we examined the percentage of patients considered adherent, defined as having a MPR greater than or equal to 80%.

Results: 23,187 patients with SLE were taking at least one immunosuppressive or anti-malarial drug.  Mean age was 38 years (SD 12) and 94% were female.  The sample was diverse (40% Black, 34% White, 16% Hispanic, 5% Asian, 5% Other, and 1% Native).  Most resided in the U.S. South (36% vs. 18% Midwest, 23% Northeast, 22% West). MPRs ranged from 31.1% for tacrolimus to 56.9% for hydroxychloroquine (Table). Across all medications, Blacks had lower adherence compared to Whites.  For many medications, Asians had higher adherence than Whites.  For example, for hydroxychloroquine, the MPR was significantly higher among Asians (63, SD 27), and lower in Blacks (53, SD 29), Hispanics (57, SD 28), and Native populations (56, SD 26) compared to Whites (59, SD 31; p<0.0001 for group comparisons).  MPRs were lowest for patients residing in the Midwest, and highest for those in the Northeast (p<0.01 across drugs). A minority of patients had MPRs greater than or equal to 80% (range 14% for tacrolimus to 40% for mycophenolate mofetil; Table).

Conclusion:   Our study demonstrates poor adherence to all classes of medications used to treat SLE among Medicaid beneficiaries.  Although adherence was low across all racial/ethnic groups and regions examined, it was particularly low among Blacks, Hispanics and Native populations, as well as for those residing in the Midwest.  These findings suggest that a majority of Medicaid beneficiaries may be at risk for inadequate clinical response because of poor adherence.  

Table.  Adherence to Commonly Used Medications for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus in a Nationwide Study of U.S. Medicaid Beneficiaries.

Oral Drug

Population Taking Medication, n

Average Medication Possession Ratio (MPR*), SD

Population with MPR greater than or equal to 80%, %

Hydroxychloroquine

23,187

56.9 (30)

31

Azathioprine

6,137

56.5 (30)

31

Methotrexate

5,278

53.1 (31)

27

Mycophenolate mofetil

3,954

56.1 (30)

40

Cyclosporine

1,185

42.9 (31)

20

Tacrolimus

1,020

31.1 (31)

14

Cyclophosphamide

778

41.2 (33)

20

Leflunomide

989

54.4 (31)

29

* Proportion of days covered by the total days’ supply dispensed over a 180-day period after the initial drug claim.


Disclosure:

J. Yazdany,
None;

J. Liu,
None;

G. S. Alarcon,
None;

K. H. Costenbader,
None;

C. H. Feldman,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/poor-adherence-to-medications-for-systemic-lupus-erythematosus-among-u-s-medicaid-beneficiaries/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology