ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1669

The Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score As a Measure Of Disease Activity In Patients With Giant Cell Arteritis

Tanaz A. Kermani1, David Cuthbertson2, Simon Carette3, Gary S. Hoffman4, Nader A. Khalidi5, Curry L. Koening6, Carol A. Langford7, Kathleen McKinnon-Maksimowicz8, Carol McAlear9, Paul A. Monach10, Philip Seo11, Kenneth J. Warrington12, Steven R. Ytterberg13, Peter A Merkel14 and Eric L. Matteson15, 1Rheumatology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 2Department of Biostatistics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, 3Division of Rheumatology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, 4Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, 5Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 6Internal Medicine, Salt Lake City Veterans Administration, Salt Lake City, UT, 7Center for Vasculitis Care and Research, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 8Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 9University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 10Rheumatology, Boston University, Boston, MA, 11Rheumatology Division, Johns Hopkins Vasculitis Center, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 12Division of Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 13Rheumatology Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 14Division of Rheumatology, University of Pennsylvania and VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, 15Rheumatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Activity score, Disease Activity, giant cell arteritis and vasculitis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Vasculitis II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

   Background/Purpose:

To evaluate the performance of the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS), a validated tool for assessment of vasculitis disease activity, in a cohort of patients with GCA.

 

   Methods:

Patients with GCA enrolled in a prospective, multicenter, longitudinal study were included. All subjects were followed with serial standardized clinical assessments. Symptoms attributable to vasculitis, BVAS, and physician global assessments (PGA) (scale 0-10) were available at each visit. Patients with a BVAS >0 at any visit, or those with symptoms of active vasculitis, were included. Manifestations of active vasculitis captured under the “Other” category of BVAS were scored as 0. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to explore the association of BVAS with other measures of disease activity including PGA, physician rated disease activity (low, moderate or high), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and C-reactive protein (CRP).

 

   Results:

During a mean (SD) follow-up of 2.3 (1.6) years, symptoms of active GCA were present in 236 visits in 136 subjects (100 female, 74%). Median (range) of BVAS1 (new or worse symptoms) was 1 (0-11), median (range) of BVAS2 (persistent symptoms) was 0 (0-5), and median (range) PGA was 4 (0-9) during the 236 episodes of active disease. In 32 encounters (14%), both BVAS1 and BVAS2 were 0. Clinical manifestations sorted by organ systems on BVAS are displayed in Table 1. Several vascular and ischemic symptoms attributed to active GCA on standardized history forms were captured in the “Other” category and did not contribute to the composite scores on BVAS, including diplopia (4 episodes, 2%), temporal artery tenderness (43 episodes, 18%), carotidynia (16 episodes, 7%), jaw/tongue claudication (65 episodes, 28%), upper extremity claudication (34 episodes, 15%), and lower extremity claudication (12 episodes, 5%).

   Table 2 contains correlations of BVAS and other measures of disease activity. BVAS1 correlated with PGA and disease activity while BVAS2 was negatively correlated with both. Neither BVAS subscore correlated with ESR or CRP.

 

   Conclusion:

The BVAS has limited utility in GCA. BVAS1, but not BVAS2, correlates positively with PGA. Several patients in this study with active GCA had a BVAS of 0. Items in 7 of the 9 organ systems on BVAS are not applicable to most patients with active GCA and important symptoms attributable to GCA often fall into the “Other” BVAS section and are not captured in the composite score. Modification of the BVAS with retention of a set of general items and inclusion of large-vessel vasculitis disease-specific items may provide more accurate disease assessment in GCA.

 

Table 1:  Frequency of clinical manifestations in 236 encounters of giant cell arteritis with active disease during observation, as captured by the Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS). BVAS items are arranged by organ systems.

BVAS items (by organ system)

New/worse symptoms*

Persistent symptoms*

General (N=193)

 

 

   Malaise

57

17

   Myalgia

51

7

   Arthralgia/arthritis

49

17

   Headache

94

9

   Fever (<38.5 degrees Celsius)

4

2

   Fever (>38.5 degrees Celsius)

2

1

   Weight loss (≥2 kilograms)

24

1

   *Median (range) BVAS for category

1 (0-3)

0 (0-2)

Cutaneous (N=1)

 

 

   Ulcer

1

0

   *Median (range) BVAS for category

0 (0-4)

0 (0-0)

Mucous membranes/eyes (N=34)

 

 

   Mouth ulcers

0

1

   Blurred vision

29

1

   Sudden vision loss

12

0

   *Median (range) total BVAS for category

0 (0-6)

0 (0-2)

Ear, Nose, and Throat (N=1)

 

 

   Sinus involvement

0

1

   *Median (range) total BVAS for category

0 (0-0)

0 (0-1)

Chest (N=9)

 

 

   Persistent cough

8

1

   *Median (range) total BVAS for category

0 (0-2)

0 (0-1)

Cardiovascular (N=2)

 

 

   Congestive heart failure

0

2

   *Median (range) BVAS for category

0 (0-0)

0 (0-2)

Abdominal (N=1)

 

 

   Severe abdominal pain

1

0

   *Median (range BVAS for category)

0 (0-3)

0 (0-0)

Renal (N=0)

 

 

   *Median (range) BVAS for category

0 (0-0)

0 (0-0)

Nervous system (N=4)

 

 

   Organic confusion/dementia

2

0

   Stroke

1

0

   Sensory peripheral neuropathy

0

1

   *Median (range) BVAS for category

0 (0-9)

0 (0-3)

Other N=85

63

22

N=total number with any clinical manifestation in that organ system
*Values are number of patients with symptoms except for median BVAS scores

 

Table 2: Correlations of BVAS with other parameters used to assess disease activity in GCA.

 

BVAS1

p-value

BVAS2

p-value

PGA

p-value

PGA

0.45

<0.001

-0.20

0.002

–

 

ESR

0.02

0.78

-0.13

0.06

0.09

0.18

CRP

0.06

0.39

-0.02

0.73

-0.003

0.98

Disease activity*

0.43

<0.001

-0.17

0.01

0.91

<0.001

BVAS= Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; BVAS1= score for new/worse disease activity; BVAS2= score for persistent disease activity; GCA= Giant cell arteritis;
PGA= physician global assessment; ESR= erythrocyte sedimentation rate;
CRP= C-reactive protein.

*rated by evaluating physician as low, medium or high.

 


Disclosure:

T. A. Kermani,
None;

D. Cuthbertson,
None;

S. Carette,
None;

G. S. Hoffman,
None;

N. A. Khalidi,
None;

C. L. Koening,
None;

C. A. Langford,
None;

K. McKinnon-Maksimowicz,
None;

C. McAlear,
None;

P. A. Monach,

Genentech and Biogen IDEC Inc.,

2;

P. Seo,
None;

K. J. Warrington,
None;

S. R. Ytterberg,
None;

P. A. Merkel,
None;

E. L. Matteson,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/the-birmingham-vasculitis-activity-score-as-a-measure-of-disease-activity-in-patients-with-giant-cell-arteritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology