Session Information
Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: Management of arthritis is a growing concern given disease prevalence and limited health care resources. In the context of a larger project investigating innovative models of care (MOC) delivery for people with arthritis, this study sought to identify the drivers, facilitators and barriers to the MOC development and implementation in British Columbia (BC), Alberta (AB) and Ontario (ON), Canada.
Methods: This study used embedded case methodology, with triangulation of documents from peer-reviewed literature, reports, working papers of MOC, health human resources (HHR), etc.; population/administrative data regarding utilization of care; and, semi-structured, one-on-one stakeholder interviews with health planners, decision-makers, program managers, and care providers. Thematic analysis using a constant comparative approach was used to identify drivers, facilitators and barriers to models/innovative processes of providing care.
Results: 79 key informants interviews (BC=24, AB=22, ON=33) of which 28 (BC=9, AB=10, ON=9) were in-depth interviews related to drivers, facilitators, and barriers were conducted between 2009 and 2012. In addition to traditional primary care to specialist referral, MOC identified included community-based direct access to services, multi-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary care. Various processes were implemented to enhance access and care provision: therapists with skills in arthritis assessment and management were embedded in primary care; specialty multi-disciplinary musculoskeletal clinics were established to interface with primary care; therapists with advanced arthritis skills practiced in triage roles to expedite priority referrals for the rheumatologist; and, health professionals traveled to smaller communities to provide service and/or utilized telehealth. For both inflammatory (IA) and non-IA, MOC developed were driven and facilitated by local factors including a local champion and the willingness of local providers to work together. In BC, this was further influenced by centralized control of resources. In AB, provincial chronic disease management policy and resources facilitated care for people with non-IA, although the resources were not viewed as sufficient to meet need. For IA services, barriers included challenges with primary care identification of need for and access to a rheumatologist; limited HHR and skill sets, particularly in rural/remote communities (this also posed challenges in providing multi-disciplinary care); and, geographically dispersed and small populations. For non-IA services, lack of recognition as a priority in local, regional, and provincial jurisdictions and limited community resources and chronic disease management resources also were barriers.
Conclusion: MOC varied greatly and local factors drove care provision for people with arthritis. Policies that facilitate arthritis management as a priority at local, regional and provincial levels, greater collaboration and linkages with community resources and increased health providers with the necessary skill sets are required to address current barriers to care for people with arthritis.
Disclosure:
A. M. Davis,
None;
C. Cott,
None;
R. Wong,
None;
M. Landry,
None;
L. Li,
None;
A. Jones,
None;
C. Frank,
None;
S. C. Lineker,
None;
L. Bergeron,
None;
G. A. Hawker,
None;
D. P. Mosher,
None;
V. Ahluwalia,
None;
M. Zummer,
None;
S. B. Jaglal,
None;
R. McGlasson,
None;
R. Birtwhistle,
None;
S. Bar,
None;
E. M. Badley,
None.
« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/models-of-care-for-arthritis-drivers-facilitators-and-barriers-to-their-development-and-implementation/