ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0776

Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 16- and 52-Week Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study

Alan Kivitz1, Liliana Sedova2, Melvin Churchill3, Roshan Kotha4, Atul Singhal5, Alexander Torres6, Guillermo Valenzuela7, Sarah Whelan8, Thomas Dumortier9, Xuan Zhu10, Ruvie Martin10 and Luminita Pricop10, 1Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, 2Institute of Rheumatology, Prague, Czech Republic, 3Arthritis Center of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE, 4Sharp Community Medical Group, La Mesa, CA, 5Southwest Arthritis Research Group, Mesquite, TX, 6Highlands Advanced Rheumatology and Arthritis Center, Avon Park, FL, 7Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists, Plantation, FL, 8Novartis Ireland Ltd, Dublin, Ireland, 9Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, 10Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2023

Keywords: Biologicals, clinical trial, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 12, 2023

Title: Abstracts: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment I: PsA

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:00PM-3:30PM

Background/Purpose: To investigate the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous (IV) secukinumab (SEC) in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) through 52 weeks.

Methods: INVIGORATE-2 (NCT04209205) is a randomized, double blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, parallel group, phase 3 study. All patients met the CASPAR criteria for active PsA, had symptoms for ≥6 months, and had a Tender Joint Count of 78 joints (TJC78) ≥3 and a Swollen Joint Count of 76 Joints (SJC76) ≥3 at baseline. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive IV SEC (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg q4w) or PBO. At Week 16, patients randomized to SEC continued receiving SEC and patients randomized to PBO were switched to IV SEC (3 mg/kg q4w) through Week 52. The primary efficacy endpoint was American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 50 response rate at Week 16 versus PBO. Secondary efficacy outcomes included achievement of ACR20, minimal disease activity, PASI90, dactylitis resolution, and enthesitis resolution. All efficacy outcomes were assessed through Week 52, and safety was evaluated through Week 60. Data through week 16 are reported using nonresponder imputation; data from Week 20 through Week 52 are reported as observed.

Results: Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced across treatment groups (Table 1). Among patients randomized to IV SEC (n=191) and IV PBO/SEC (n=190), similar proportions of patients completed the entire study period (90.6% and 87.9%, respectively). A higher proportion of patients receiving SEC than PBO achieved ACR50 at Week 16 using nonresponder imputation (60/191 [31.4%] vs 12/190 [6.3%]; P< .0001; Figure 1). An increase in ACR50 response was observed by Week 20 among patients initially randomized to PBO who were switched to SEC at Week 16. Both groups had similar ACR50 response rates by Week 52 based on observed data (SEC, 58.0%; PBO/SEC, 64.0%). Patients receiving SEC had greater improvements in secondary efficacy outcomes compared with PBO at Week 16, and both SEC and PBO/SEC groups had comparable efficacy outcomes by Week 52 (Figure 2). Through Week 16, the incidences of adverse events (AEs; 37.7% vs 38.4%), serious AEs (1.6% vs 2.1%), and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation (0.5% vs 1.6%) were similar for patients receiving SEC or PBO. Among patients receiving any SEC through the entire study period, 63.4%, 5.9%, and 1.9% reported any AE, serious AEs, and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, respectively. One death was reported in the PBO group prior to Week 16. No new safety signals were observed with IV SEC.

Conclusion: IV SEC (6 mg/kg at baseline followed by 3 mg/kg q4w) was safe and effective for the long-term treatment of active PsA. Treatment responses were maintained up to Week 52 for patients randomized to IV SEC. For patients originally randomized to PBO who switched to receive IV SEC at Week 16, an increase in efficacy responses comparable to those in patients randomized to IV SEC was observed up to Week 52. Safety was consistent with the known safety profile of subcutaneous SEC, and no new safety signals were observed.

Supporting image 1

Table 1. Patient demographics and baseline disease characteristics

Supporting image 2

Figure 1. Proportion of patients with PsA who achieved ACR50 through Week 16 (nonresponder imputation) and through Week 52 (observed data)

Supporting image 3

Figure 2. Proportions of patients with PsA who achieved binary secondary efficacy outcomes at Week 16 (nonresponder imputation) and Week 52 (observed data)


Disclosures: A. Kivitz: AbbVie, 6, Amgen, 6, 11, Chemocentryx, 1, Eli Lilly, 6, Fresenius Kabi, 2, Genzyme, 2, Gilead, 2, 11, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), 2, 6, 11, Grunenthal, 2, Horizon, 1, 2, Janssen, 1, 2, Novartis, 4, 11, Pfizer, 2, 6, 11, Selecta, 2, Synact, 2, Takeda, 2, UCB, 1, 6; L. Sedova: AbbVie, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, 6, Eli Lilly, 6, Novartis, 5, 6, Pfizer, 5, 6, UCB, 5; M. Churchill: Novartis, 5; R. Kotha: Novartis, 5; A. Singhal: AbbVie, 5, 6, Amgen, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb(BMS), 5, Eli Lilly, 5, FujiFilm, 5, Gilead, 5, Janssen, 5, Mallinckrodt, 5, MedImmune, 5, Nichi-Iko, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5; A. Torres: None; G. Valenzuela: AbbVie, 2, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 12, Investigator, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, Genentech, 2, 6, GlaxoSmithKlein(GSK), 2, Janssen, 2, Merck, 2, MLKCDT, 12, Investigator, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, Regeneron, 2, Sanofi, 2, UCB, 2; S. Whelan: Novartis, 3, 11; T. Dumortier: Novartis, 3, 11; X. Zhu: Novartis, 3, 11; R. Martin: Novartis, 3, 11; L. Pricop: Novartis, 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kivitz A, Sedova L, Churchill M, Kotha R, Singhal A, Torres A, Valenzuela G, Whelan S, Dumortier T, Zhu X, Martin R, Pricop L. Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Secukinumab for the Treatment of Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 16- and 52-Week Results from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2023; 75 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-intravenous-secukinumab-for-the-treatment-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-16-and-52-week-results-from-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-3-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2023

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-intravenous-secukinumab-for-the-treatment-of-active-psoriatic-arthritis-16-and-52-week-results-from-a-randomized-double-blind-phase-3-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology