ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1547

Effectiveness of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitors for Polymyalgia Rheumatica

Jeffrey Curtis1, Kerri Ford2, Stefano Fiore3, Danielle Isaman4, Lita Araujo5, Natalia Petruski-Ivleva6 and Fenglong Xie7, 1Division of Clinical Immunology & Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, 2Sanofi, Destin, FL, 3Sanofi, Bridgewater, NJ, 4Sanofi, Chapel Hill, NC, 5Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, 6Sanofi, Unknown, 7University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2022

Keywords: Interleukins, Pharmacoepidemiology, Polymyalgia Rheumatica (PMR)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 13, 2022

Title: Vasculitis – Non-ANCA-Associated and Related Disorders Poster II

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 1:00PM-3:00PM

Background/Purpose: Interleukin-6 receptor (IL-6R) inhibition has been shown to be effective in giant cell arteritis but data are limited in polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate effectiveness of IL-6R inhibitors (IL-6Ri; sarilumab or tocilizumab) in 3rd-line and 2nd-line treatment of glucocorticoid (GC)-refractory PMR patients compared to conventional immunomodulatory (cIM) therapy.

Methods: Adults with PMR, defined as 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims with a PMR diagnosis ≥30 days apart, were identified from national fee-for-service Medicare (100% sample) data between 3/29/2016- to 6/30/2020. Included were those who initiated IL-6Ri or cIM as 2nd-line and 3rd-line therapy for PMR and had continuous enrollment for 180 days prior to therapy initiation (baseline). For 3rd-line cohort, the index date was date of switch from cIM to IL-6Ri for the IL-6Ri group and switch from one cIM to another cIM for the cIM group. For 2nd-line cohort, the index date was the date of initiation of IL-6Ri with no prior cIM for the IL-6Ri group and new use of cIM for the cIM group. A 180-day washout period for the index drug was applied to all cohorts. Patients were on GC on index date (≤25mg/day) and excluded if they had evidence of seropositive rheumatoid arthritis, other inflammatory arthritis or connective tissue disease, multiple sclerosis, or malignancy. Patients on IL-6Ri and cIM were matched 1:1 on age, sex, and GC dose category, and propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Outcomes assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards models included GC discontinuation; GC discontinuation or low dose GC (< 2mg/day); and non-persistence (discontinuation of IL-6Ri or cIM, or switch) in the 2nd-line cohort, adjusting for residually imbalanced factors after matching. Censoring occurred at 1 year, death, 60 days before end of enrollment, or addition of comparator PMR therapy with additional censoring applied in sensitivity analysis for drug discontinuation and/or switching.

Results: After matching, 409 3rd-line and 251 2nd-line patients were included in the analysis. Post-match, patient characteristics were generally well balanced between cohorts, with small differences between exposure groups (Table 1). Median time from first PMR diagnosis to start of follow-up was approximately 1.75 years (3rd-line) and 0.90 years (2nd-line) and similar between groups. After matching and adjustment, patients receiving IL-6Ri were more likely to achieve GC discontinuation or low dose GC, compared to cIM patients (Table 2). Time to discontinuation (Figure) was significantly greater for IL-6Ri vs. cIM patients (p=0.029).

Conclusion: IL-6Ri therapy was more effective as a steroid sparing agent compared to cIM therapy for adult patients with PMR.

Supporting image 1

Supporting image 2

Supporting image 3


Disclosures: J. Curtis, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), CorEvitas, IlluminationHealth, Janssen, Lilly, Myriad, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, UCB, Aqtual, Bendcare, FASTER, GlaxoSmithKlein (GSK), Labcorp, Scipher, Setpoint, United Rheumatology, AbbVie, ArthritisPower; K. Ford, Sanofi; S. Fiore, Sanofi; D. Isaman, Sanofi; L. Araujo, Sanofi; N. Petruski-Ivleva, Sanofi; F. Xie, Bendcare.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Curtis J, Ford K, Fiore S, Isaman D, Araujo L, Petruski-Ivleva N, Xie F. Effectiveness of Interleukin-6 Receptor Inhibitors for Polymyalgia Rheumatica [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022; 74 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-interleukin-6-receptor-inhibitors-for-polymyalgia-rheumatica/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2022

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/effectiveness-of-interleukin-6-receptor-inhibitors-for-polymyalgia-rheumatica/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology