ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2341

Efficacy Of Adalimumab Plus Methotrexate Therapy In Rheumatoid Arthritis Non-Responders Receiving Methotrexate Monotherapy Or Adalimumab Combination Therapy: Results From The Optima Trial

Josef S. Smolen1, Ronald F. van Vollenhoven2, Roy Fleischmann3, Paul Emery4, Stefan Florentinus5, Suchitrita S. Rathmann6, Anabela Cardoso7, Hartmut Kupper8 and Arthur Kavanaugh9, 1Medical University of Vienna and Hietzing Hospital, Vienna, Austria, 2The Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden, 3University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, 4Leeds Teaching Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5AbbVie, Rungis, France, 6AbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL, 7AbbVie, Amadora, Portugal, 8AbbVie Deutschland GmBH & Co. KG, Ludwigshafen, Germany, 9University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adalimumab, Disease Activity, methotrexate (MTX), remission and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Rheumatoid Arthritis Treatment - Small Molecules, Biologics and Gene Therapy III

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: EULAR recommendations advocate Methotrexate (MTX) as first line therapy. For patients (pts) who fail to attain remission or low disease activity (LDA) after 6 months of MTX treatment, TNF inhibitors should be added to the therapeutic regimen in pts with high risk of bad outcome. This post hocanalysis examined outcomes following open label (OL) adalimumab (ADA) +MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) pts who did not achieve a stable LDA target at 22 and 26 weeks (wks) either from ADA+MTX or MTX monotherapy. Consequences of optimizing or not optimizing therapy were assessed.

Methods: OPTIMA was a 78 wk, randomized, double-blind, double-treatment period study designed to compare safety and efficacy of ADA+MTX with placebo (PBO) +MTX in early RA pts. Following ADA+MTX or PBO+MTX treatment for 26 wks (Period 1), non-responders (NR) were defined as pts failing to achieve a stable LDA target of DAS28(CRP) <3.2 at wks 22 and 26 and given OL ADA+MTX for an additional 52 wks, (Period 2) (OL ADA Carry On and Rescue ADA arms, respectively). Period 2 responders were defined as those achieving LDA at wk78 following OL ADA+MTX therapy. Logistic regression analysis was conducted with baseline and wk26 disease characteristics as variables.

Results: Compared with responders, Period 1 NR began the study with higher overall disease activity. Among these, 78/259 (30%) OL ADA Carry On and 157/348 (45%) Rescue ADA pts achieved DAS28(CRP) <3.2 following 26 wks of OL ADA+MTX therapy; 33/259 (13%) and 49/348 (14%) OL ADA Carry On and Rescue ADA pts, respectively, had DAS28(CRP) ≥3.2 at wk52 and achieved DAS28(CRP) <3.2 at wk78. Mean values of responders’ clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes were much lower than those of NR and were similar to those seen for pts who achieved the treatment target within the first period. This indicates that starting with MTX followed by ADA in insufficient responders to MTX is an appropriate strategy; a small subset of pts responds more slowly to MTX/ADA combination from start (Table). ACR20/50/70 scores for the Rescue ADA arm from wk26 to wk78 were sizeable (51%, 34%, and 19%, respectively). OL ADA Carry On arm achieved ACR20/50/70 from wk26 baseline in 27%, 15%, and 8% of pts, respectively, at wk78. Age, patient and physician’s global assessment of disease, and tender/swollen joint counts were all predictors of achieving DAS28(CRP) <3.2 at wk78.

 

Table. Period 2 Responder vs. Non-Responder Outcomes

                           

DAS28(CRP)

mTSS

HAQ-DI

Responders

Non-Responders

Responders

Non-Responders

Responders

Non-Responders

 

COa

RESb

COa

RESb

COa

RESb

COa

RESb

COa

RESb

COa

RESb

 

n=106

n=175

n=121

n=142

n=106

n=175

n=120

n=142

n=106

n=175

n=121

n=142

Baseline

6.13c

5.98d

6.32e

6.34f

10.16c

11.15

11.98

13.44

1.75c

1.59g

1.71

1.73

Week 26

3.73

4.13

4.41

4.88

10.34

12.75

12.27

14.14

0.82

0.94

1.10

1.20

Week 52

2.38

2.29

4.34

4.25

10.38

12.76

12.32

14.18

0.62

0.53

1.10

1.02

Week 78

2.71

2.28

4.02

3.81

10.66

12.65

12.41

14.51

0.60

0.50

1.08

1.01

aADA Carry On arm; bRescue ADA arm; cn=105; dn=169; en=118; fn=141; gn=174; DAS28(CRP), 28-joint disease activity score with C-reactive protein; mTSS, modified total Sharp score; HAQ-DI, disability index of the health assessment questionnaire.

Conclusion: When advanced to OL ADA+MTX therapy, pts initially not achieving stable LDA target at wk26 following MTX monotherapy demonstrated improvements in clinical and functional outcomes at wk52 and wk78. In addition, structural progression was minimal. Some improvement was also seen among pts who did not yet attain stable LDA at wk26 on ADA+MTX but continued this treatment; however, it remains unknown whether pts who were not in LDA at wk78 might have benefited from earlier treatment adjustment in an attempt to further improve outcomes.


Disclosure:

J. S. Smolen,

AbbVie Inc., Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Glaxo, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Novo-Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB,

2,

AbbVie Inc., Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Glaxo, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Novo-Nordisk, Roche, Sandoz, and UCB,

5;

R. F. van Vollenhoven,

AbbVie Inc., BMS, Glaxo, HGS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

2,

AbbVie Inc., BMS, Glaxo, HGS, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

5;

R. Fleischmann,

AbbVie Inc., Pfizer, Merck, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Centocor-Jannsen, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novartis,

2,

AbbVie Inc., Pfizer, Merck, Roche, UCB, Celgene, Centocor-Jannsen, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Lilly, Sanofi-Aventis, and Novartis,

5;

P. Emery,

AbbVie Inc., Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, and BMS,

2,

AbbVie Inc., Merck, Pfizer, UCB, Roche, and BMS,

5;

S. Florentinus,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

S. S. Rathmann,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

A. Cardoso,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

H. Kupper,

AbbVie,

1,

AbbVie,

3;

A. Kavanaugh,

AbbVie Inc., Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

2,

AbbVie Inc., Amgen, Astra-Zeneca, BMS, Celgene, Centocor-Janssen, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB,

5.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-of-adalimumab-plus-methotrexate-therapy-in-rheumatoid-arthritis-non-responders-receiving-methotrexate-monotherapy-or-adalimumab-combination-therapy-results-from-the-optima-trial/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology