ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: L18

Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to a Second Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 in People Receiving Methotrexate or Targeted Immunosuppression: A Cohort Study

Satveer K Mahil1, Katie Bechman2, Antony Raharja1, Clara Domingo-Vila3, David Baudry1, Matt Brown2, Andrew Cope2, Tejus Dasandi1, Hataf Khan4, Thomas Lechmere4, Michael Malim4, Freya Meynell1, Emily Pollock3, Kamila Sychowska3, Jonathan Barker1, Sam Norton5, James Galloway2, Katie Doores4, Timothy Tree3 and Catherine Smith1, 1St John’s Institute of Dermatology, Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College London, London, 2Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College London, London, 3Department of Immunobiology, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 4Department of Infectious Diseases, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom, 5Psychology Department, Institute for Psychiatry Psychology & Neuroscience, King’s College London, London

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Date of first publication: October 22, 2021

Keywords: Biologicals, COVID-19, Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs (Dmards), Late-Breaking 2021

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Late-Breaking Abstracts (L16 - L21)

Session Type: Late-Breaking Abstract Session

Session Time: 11:00AM-11:15AM

Background/Purpose: COVID-19 vaccines have robust immunogenicity in the general population. Data on individuals with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases who are taking immunosuppressants remains limited. Our cohort study showed that methotrexate but not targeted biologics impaired functional humoral immunity to a single dose of COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), while cellular responses were comparable. We sought to assess immune responses following a second dose.

Methods: Individuals with the common inflammatory skin disease psoriasis receiving methotrexate or biologic monotherapy (TNF, IL-17, or IL-23 inhibitors) were recruited from a national specialist psoriasis centre serving London/South-East England. Healthy volunteers without psoriasis, not receiving immunosuppression, were recruited as controls. Immunogenicity was assessed immediately before, on day 28 after the first BNT162b2 dose and on day 14 post-second dose (administered according to an extended interval regimen). Immune responses following the second dose are reported. Primary outcomes were humoral immunity to the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein, defined as neutralising antibody responses to wild-type, Alpha and Delta SARS-CoV-2, and spike-specific T cell responses (IFNγ, IL-2, IL-21).

Results: The study population (n=82) included patients with psoriasis receiving methotrexate (n=14), TNF inhibitors (n=19), IL-17 inhibitors (n=14), IL-23 inhibitors (n=20) and healthy controls (n=15), who had received both vaccine doses. The median age of the study population was 44 years (IQR 33–52), with 43 (52%) males and 71 (87%) participants of white ethnicity. All participants seroconverted at 14 days following the second vaccine dose. All study groups (healthy controls, methotrexate, targeted biologics) demonstrated comparable neutralising antibody titres against wild-type, Alpha and Delta variants. In contrast, a lower proportion of participants on methotrexate (62%, 95%CI 32-86) and targeted biologics (74%, 95%CI 60-85) had detectable T cell responses following the second dose, compared to controls (100%, 95%CI 77-100) (p=0.022). Overall, there was no difference in the magnitude of T cell responses between all patients receiving methotrexate (median log-cytokine-secreting cells per 106 cells 2.2 [IQR 1.0–2.8]), targeted biologics (2.2 [IQR 1.4–2.7], p=0.5578) and controls (2.3 [IQR 2.1–2.5], p=0.4093).

Conclusion: Functional humoral immunity at 14 days following a second dose of BNT162b2 is not impaired by methotrexate or targeted biologics. A proportion of patients on immunosuppression do not have detectable T cell responses following the second dose. The longevity of vaccine-elicited antibody responses is uncertain in this population.

Table 1. Efficacy of the first and second dose of COVID_19 vaccine BNT162b2 in study participants.

A threshold EC50 value of 25 was used for anti-SARS-CoV_2 IgG titres, at which serological responses were classified as positive.
A threshold value of 30 cytokine secreting cells per million PBMCs was established for total T cell responses (IFNγ and/or IL_2 and/or IL_21), at which the T cell response was classified as positive.

Figure 1 – Neutralising antibody responses to COVID_19 vaccine BNT162b2

A. Neutralising antibody titres against prototypic (wild-type) strain and Alpha variant at day 28 following the first dose and at day 14 following the second dose of COVID_19 vaccine BNT162b2. The circles represent individual values. The red diamonds and range lines indicate the median and interquartile range (IQR), respectively. In the IL23i group, filled circles represent participants receiving IL_23p19 inhibitors and hollow circles represent participants receiving IL_23p40/IL_12 inhibition. Horizontal dashed line indicates neutralisation activity threshold.

B. Neutralising antibody titres against wild-type SARS-CoV_2, Alpha variant, and Delta variant at day 14 following the second dose of COVID_19 vaccine BNT162b2. The circles represent individual values. The red diamonds and range lines indicate the median and interquartile range (IQR). In the IL23i group, filled circles represent participants receiving IL_23p19 inhibitors and hollow circles represent participants receiving IL_23p40/IL_12 inhibition. Horizontal dashed line indicates neutralisation activity threshold.
HV, healthy volunteers; MTX, methotrexate; TNFi, TNF inhibitors; IL17i, IL_17 inhibitors; IL23i, IL_23 inhibitors; ID50, 50% inhibitory dilution.

Figure 2 – T cell responses to COVID_19 vaccine BNT162b2

A. Fold change in total T cell response, as determined by IFNγ and/or IL_2 and/or IL_21 responses to stimulation with peptides from total Spike peptide pools between the first dose and second dose of COVID_19 vaccine. The red diamonds and range lines indicate the median and interquartile range (IQR).

B. Total T cell response, as determined by IFNγ and/or IL_2 and/or IL_21 responses to stimulation with peptides from total Spike peptide pools, reported as number of cytokine secreting cells per 106 PBMCs at day 28 following the first dose and at day 14 following the second dose of COVID_19 vaccine. The circles represent individual values. The red diamonds and range lines indicate the median and interquartile range (IQR), respectively. Horizontal dashed line indicates total T cell response threshold. In the IL23i group, filled circles represent participants receiving IL_23p19 inhibitors and hollow circles represent participants receiving IL_23p40/IL_12 inhibition.
HV, healthy volunteers; MTX, methotrexate; TNFi, TNF inhibitors; IL17i, IL_17 inhibitors; IL23i, IL_23 inhibitors.


S. Mahil, AbbVie, 5, Almirall, 5, Eli-Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Sanofi, 5, UCB, 5; K. Bechman, None; a. Raharja, None; c. domingo-Vila, None; d. Baudry, None; m. Brown, Novartis, 6, Janssen, 6, UCB, 5, 6, Ipsen, 2, Regeneron, 1, Grey Wolf, 2, Pathios, 2, Botanix, 1, Mimetica, 1, Abbvie, 6; A. Cope, Bristol-Myers Squib, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, Abbvie, 2, UCB, 2; t. Dasandi, None; h. Khan, None; t. Lechmere, None; m. Malim, None; f. Meynell, None; e. pollock, None; k. Sychowska, None; J. Barker, None; S. Norton, Pfizer, 12, Personal Fees, Janssen, 12, Personal Fees; J. Galloway, Abbvie, 12, Personal Fees, Sanofi, 12, Personal Fees, Novartis, 12, Personal Fees, Pfizer, 12, Personal Fees, Eli Lilly, 5, Janssen, 12, Personal Fees, UCB, 12, Personal Fees; k. Doores, None; t. Tree, GlaxoSmithKleine, 2, 5, Sanofi, 5, Imcyse, 5, Novartis, 2, Quell Theraputics, 2, UCB, 6; c. Smith, Abbvie, 5, Sanofi, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Mahil S, Bechman K, Raharja a, domingo-Vila c, Baudry d, Brown m, Cope A, Dasandi t, Khan h, Lechmere t, Malim m, Meynell f, pollock e, Sychowska k, Barker J, Norton S, Galloway J, Doores k, Tree t, Smith c. Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to a Second Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine BNT162b2 in People Receiving Methotrexate or Targeted Immunosuppression: A Cohort Study [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/humoral-and-cellular-immune-responses-to-a-second-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-bnt162b2-in-people-receiving-methotrexate-or-targeted-immunosuppression-a-cohort-study/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/humoral-and-cellular-immune-responses-to-a-second-dose-of-covid-19-vaccine-bnt162b2-in-people-receiving-methotrexate-or-targeted-immunosuppression-a-cohort-study/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology