ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1812

Correlations Between Reductions in Fatigue Severity and Improvements in Physical Function and Clinical Response in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the Phase 3 DISCOVER Program

Arthur Kavanaugh1, Yan Liu2, Atul Deodhar3, Proton Rahman4, Philip Mease5, Philip S Helliwell6, Laure Gossec7, Alexa Kollmeier8, Elizabeth Hsia2, May Shawi9 and Chenglong Han2, 1Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, 2Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 3Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 4Department of Medicine, Eastern Health and Memorial University of Newfoundland, St John's, NL, Canada, 5Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 6Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 7Sorbonne Université and Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 9Janssen Immunology Global Commercial Strategy Organization, Toronto, ON, Canada

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 9, 2021

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including PsA – Treatment Poster III: Psoriatic Arthritis II (1801–1835)

Session Type: Poster Session D

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: In patients (pts) with PsA, fatigue is a major driver of perceived impact of disease and has been identified as an important domain to be assessed in clinical trials.1,2 The association between fatigue and other PsA domains (eg, physical function) or clinical response is not well understood. Fatigue was measured with the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue questionnaire in the pivotal DISCOVER-1 & -2 phase 3 studies of guselkumab (GUS) vs placebo (PBO). This post hoc analysis explores the correlation between FACIT-Fatigue and physical function and clinical response in the DISCOVER program.

Methods: This analysis used pooled data from pts (N=1120) treated with GUS or PBO. In DISCOVER-1 & -2, 381 pts with active PsA (swollen joint count [SJC] ≥3, tender joint count [TJC] ≥3, CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL) and 739 pts with active PsA (SJC ≥5, TJC ≥5, CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL) and inadequate response to standard therapies, respectively, were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at Week (W) 0, W4, then Q8W; or PBO. PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg Q4W at W24. The FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire has 13 items that assess self-reported fatigue/tiredness over the last 7 days. Items are scored from 0 (very much fatigued) to 4 (not at all fatigued). FACIT-Fatigue response was defined as an increase of ≥4 points from baseline. Physical function was evaluated with the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). HAQ-DI response was defined as a decrease of ≥0.35 points from baseline. Clinical response was defined as achievement of ACR 20 criteria. Relationships between FACIT-Fatigue and HAQ-DI at W8/16/24 were assessed by Pearson correlation coefficients. Mean changes in HAQ-DI scores at W8/16/24 were summarized in FACIT-Fatigue responders and nonresponders. A logistic regression model was applied to estimate odds ratios (ORs) for achievement of HAQ-DI and ACR 20 response by FACIT-Fatigue response status at each visit. A multiple linear regression model was used to evaluate the association between FACIT-Fatigue and HAQ-DI at W24 after adjusting for SJC, TJC, CRP, and pt assessment of pain.

Results: FACIT-Fatigue and HAQ-DI scores and changes from baseline were negatively correlated at W8, W16, and W24 (Table). Mean changes in HAQ-DI were −0.31, −0.43, and −0.48 at W8, W16, and W24, respectively, in FACIT-Fatigue responders and −0.06, −0.07, and −0.09, respectively, in FACIT-Fatigue nonresponders. FACIT-Fatigue responders were significantly more likely than nonresponders to achieve HAQ-DI and ACR 20 response (OR [95% CI] at W8, 2.8 [2.2-3.7] and 2.4 [1.9-3.1]; at W16, 3.6 [2.8-4.7] and 2.9 [2.3-3.7]; and at W24, 4.4 [3.4-5.7] and 3.2 [2.5-4.2], respectively; Figure). Correlations between FACIT-Fatigue and HAQ-DI remained significant after adjusting for SJC, TJC, CRP, and pt assessment of pain.

Conclusion: In pts with PsA, fatigue response is a clinically meaningful predictor of improvements in physical function and achievement of ACR 20 response, reinforcing the importance of assessing fatigue in PsA disease management.

1. Leung YY et al. J Rheumatol. 2020;96:46-9
2. Gudu T et al. Joint Bone Spine. 2016;83:439-43


Disclosures: A. Kavanaugh, AbbVie, 2, 5, Amgen, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5; Y. Liu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; A. Deodhar, Amgen, 2, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 12, Paid Instructor, AbbVie, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Glaxo Smith & Kline, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, 12, Paid Instructor, UCB, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2; P. Rahman, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, AbbVie, 2, 6, Amgen, 2, 6, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 6, Celgene, 2, 6, Eli Lilly, 2, 6, Pfizer, 2, 6, UCB, 2, 6, Merck, 2, 6; P. Mease, AbbVie, 2, 5, 6, Amgen, 2, 5, 6, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 6, Galapagos, 2, 5, Celgene, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Genentech, 2, 5, 6, Janssen, 2, 5, 6, Gilead Sciences, 2, 5, 6, Novartis, 2, 5, 6, Pfizer, 2, 5, 6, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 6, GSK, 2; P. Helliwell, Pfizer Inc, 1, Novartis, 6, Janssen, 1, 6, AbbVie, 6, Galapagos, 1, Eli Lilly, 1; L. Gossec, Galapagos, 5, Sandoz, 5, Sanofi, 5, AbbVie, 2, Amgen, 2, 5, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, Biogen, 2, Celgene, 2, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, Gilead, 2, Janssen, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, Pfizer, 2, 5, Samsung Bioepis, 2, Sanofi-Aventis, 2, UCB, 2; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11; C. Han, Janssen Research & Development, LLC (a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson), 3, 11.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Kavanaugh A, Liu Y, Deodhar A, Rahman P, Mease P, Helliwell P, Gossec L, Kollmeier A, Hsia E, Shawi M, Han C. Correlations Between Reductions in Fatigue Severity and Improvements in Physical Function and Clinical Response in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: Results from the Phase 3 DISCOVER Program [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/correlations-between-reductions-in-fatigue-severity-and-improvements-in-physical-function-and-clinical-response-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-phase-3-discover-program/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/correlations-between-reductions-in-fatigue-severity-and-improvements-in-physical-function-and-clinical-response-in-patients-with-psoriatic-arthritis-results-from-the-phase-3-discover-program/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology