ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2570

Tenofovir But Not Adefovir Prevents Liver and Skin Fibrosis In Two Models Of Adenosine-Mediated Injury

Jessica L. Feig1, Doreen Tivon2, Miguel perez Aso3, Timothy Cardozo2 and Bruce N. Cronstein4, 1Medicine. Department of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 2Department of Translational Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, 3NYU Univ Medical Center, New York, NY, 4Internal Medicine, NYU School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, New York, NY

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Adenosine receptors, scleroderma and skin

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud's II

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: Acyclic nucleoside phosphonates are a key class of antivirals commonly used in the treatment of both DNA and retroviral infections.  Adefovir and tenofovir are AMP analogues that resemble substrates of CD73.  We have previously reported that adenosine, generated by the CD73-mediated dephosphorylation of AMP, acting at A2Areceptors, plays a critical role in development of both hepatic and dermal fibrosis in murine models of cirrhosis and scleroderma, respectively. A recent clinical trial demonstrated that tenofovir, but not other antiviral agents, reverses hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis in patients with hepatitis B.  We therefore proposed the hypothesis that tenofovir’s antifibrotic effects are mediated by inhibition of adenosine production by CD73-mediated dephosphorylation of AMP.Methods:  In silico modeling and docking studies were performed using an ICM-Browser www.molsoft.com. CD73 enzyme activity was quantitated by malachite green. Alkaline Phosphatase activity (Abcam) was performed. Thioacetamide(TAA,100 mg/kg IP)-treated mice were treated with vehicle, Adefovir, or Tenofovir (75mg/kg, SubQ) [n=5-10 per group].  Bleomycin (0.25 U, SubQ)-treated mice were treated with vehicle, Adefovir, or Tenofovir (75mg/kg, IP) [n=5-10 per group].  Adenosine levels were determined by HPLC. Skin breaking strength was via tensiometer. H&E or picrosirus red-stained slides were imaged, and pixel quantification was performed with SigmaScan software.   Scar index was determined as the ratio of red/green pixels representing compact/filamentous fibers; higher numbers indicate more fibrosis. Results: In silico modeling data suggested that both adefovir and tenofovir bound to the enzymatic pocket of CD73.  Tenofovir (Sequoia), but not adefovir (Sequoia), inhibited CD73 activity of 293T cells overexpressing CD73 (38+7.4%, at 10 uM) and of recombinant enzyme (72+1.0%, at 10uM). Yet, the inhibition of CD73 by Tenofovir (Gilead) was not pharmacologically relevant with an IC50>100uM.  Alkaline phosphatase activity wasn’t modulated by Adefovir or Tenofovir. Adefovir decreased adenosine levels in the skin of bleomycin-challenged mice though this trend was not significant.  Tenofovir significantly decreased adenosine levels in the skin of bleomycin-challenged mice (273.95+8.41 vs. 432.58+24.34nM adenosine/12mm punch biopsy, n=8-10, [p<0.05]). Tenofovir (75mg/kg), but not Adefovir (75mg/kg), diminished hepatic fibrosis in thioacetamide-treated mice (fibrotic area/hepatic slide area 1.00+0.04% vs 4.45+0.37%) Tenofovir (75mg/kg), but not Adefovir (75mg/kg), diminished bleomycin-induced dermal fibrosis in bleomycin-treated mice (73.7+3.1% reduction of hydroxyproline content [p<0.05]; 33.5+3.8% reduction of dermal thickness [p<0.06] and reduction of breaking tension by 66.8+1.4% [p<0.05]). Picrosirius red staining showed dramatic altering of dermal collagen quality (scar index of 1.2+0.1 vs 22.2+0.7 [p<0.001], normal skin is 2.5) in Tenofovir-treated mice. Conclusion: Tenofovir reduces fibrosis via inhibition of adenosine production.  Tenofovir may have therapeutic potential in treating fibrosis in patients suffering from non-viral fibrosing diseases such as scleroderma.


Disclosure:

J. L. Feig,
None;

D. Tivon,
None;

M. perez Aso,
None;

T. Cardozo,
None;

B. N. Cronstein,

Canfite Pharma,

1,

NIH, Gilead, Takeda, AstraZeneca,

2,

NYU School of Medicine,

3,

Merck-SeronoBristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, CanFite Biopharmaceuticals, Cypress Laboratories, Regeneron (Westat, DSMB), Endocyte, Protalex, Allos, Inc., Savient, Gismo Therapeutics, Antares Pharmaceutical, Medivector,

5,

Multiple patents on adenosine receptors and bone metabolism, pharmacology,

9.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/tenofovir-but-not-adefovir-prevents-liver-and-skin-fibrosis-in-two-models-of-adenosine-mediated-injury/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology