Session Information
Title: Systemic Sclerosis, Fibrosing Syndromes, and Raynaud’s - Clinical Aspects and Therapeutics II
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose:
Trials of therapy in pulmonary hypertension(PH) have generally excluded patients with significant interstitial lung disease, but many patients with systemic sclerosis(SSc) and PH have some interstitial lung disease. There are concerns that PH drugs may cause ventilation-perfusion mismatch and worsen PH, and it remains unclear if PH drugs improve outcomes for these patients. PHAROS , Pulmonary Hypertension Assessment and Recognition of Outcomes in Scleroderma, is a prospective observational multi-center cohort study of SSc-PH. Our objective is to describe the real-world experience of SSc-PH patients with restrictive lung disease treated with a single PH medication.
Methods:
We included patients with PH defined as a mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) ≥25mmHg on catheterization who had a FVC <70% predicted at the time of the diagnosis. Patients were grouped into 3 groups, based on the treatment during the first year following the PH diagnosis: No drug treatment, treatment with an endothelin receptor blocker antagonist (ERA), or andphosphodiesterase inhibitor (PDE). For this initial look at the data, patients treated with combination therapy and/or prostacyclins (PCA) were excluded. The primary outcome examined was one-year survival, with secondary outcomes of hospitalization, change in functional class, 6 minute walk and patient questionnaires at one year.
Results:
Of the 266 patients with PH in PHAROS, 98 had a FVC <70% and were included . There were 26 receiving no therapy (No Drug), 19 receiving ERA and 33 treated with PDE. We excluded 18 treated with combination and 2 treated with PCAs alone. There were no significant differences in the demographics or the cardiopulmonary parameters between the 3 groups. These patients had striking restrictive disease with a mean FVC between 50 and 55% predicted. Although over survival was not statistically different between the 3 groups, patients in the PDE group had fewer deaths and a better 1 and 2 year survival than the No Drug group. (p<0.05). There were more patients in the PDE group who had an improvement compared to the ND group and neither treatment group had an increase in hospitalizations after starting the drugs (Table 1).
Conclusion:
SSc patients with PH and restrictive lung disease are being treated with PH drugs. Our observations suggest that some patients may respond favorably, without evidence of worsening PH. We strongly encourage further study of PH drugs in SSc-ILD patients in a controlled setting.
|
No Drug n=26 |
ERA n=19 |
PDE n=33 |
|||
Age – yr, mean |
54.5 |
57.2 |
56.8 |
|||
Disease Duration yr, mean |
10.1 |
8.3 |
9.2 |
|||
% Female sex |
70 |
79 |
62 |
|||
% White race |
|
63 |
64 |
|||
% Diffuse cutaneous |
42 |
63 |
42 |
|||
FVC% predicted |
52.2 |
49.9 |
55.5 |
|||
DLCO % predicted |
33.6 |
25.9 |
42.0 |
|||
RHC m PAP |
|
33.3 |
36 |
|||
PVR (Woods) |
293 |
343 |
419 |
|||
Response in 1st year |
23% |
37% |
43% |
|||
Hospitalizations |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|||
Deaths in 1st year |
7 |
3 |
1 |
|||
Survival, 1, 2 year |
69%, 61% |
82%, 64% |
96%, 76% |
Disclosure:
V. D. Steen,
Gilead Science, ,
2,
Gilead Science,
5,
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,
2,
Actelion Pharmaceuticals US,
8,
Roche Pharmaceuticals,
2,
Celgene,
2,
Sanofi-Aventis Pharmaceutical,
2;
R. T. Domsic,
None.
« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/treatment-of-pulmonary-hypertension-in-scleroderma-patients-with-restricitive-lung-disease-observations-from-the-pulmonary-hypertension-assessment-and-recognition-of-outcomes-in-scleroderma-coho/