ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0602

Use of a Popular Opinion Leader Model to Disseminate Information Virtually About Clinical Trial Enrollment to People of Color with Lupus

Kreager Taber1, Holly Milaeger2, Jessica Williams1, Daniel Erickson3, Elmer Freeman4, Patricia Canessa5, Rosalind Ramsey-Goldman6 and Candace Feldman1, 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, 2Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 3Northwestern University, Feinbergy School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, 4CCHERS, Inc., Boston, MA, 5State of Illinois Board of Health, Chicago, IL, 6Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2021

Keywords: Community programs, Disparities, Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 7, 2021

Title: Healthcare Disparities in Rheumatology Poster (0594–0622)

Session Type: Poster Session B

Session Time: 8:30AM-10:30AM

Background/Purpose: Despite a disproportionate burden of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and disparities in adverse outcomes among Black compared to white individuals, people of color are underrepresented in SLE clinical trials. Our aims were: 1) to leverage a community-academic partnership in Boston and Chicago to develop clinical trial education modules for individuals who self-identify as Black with SLE and 2) to recruit and train trusted Popular Opinion Leaders (POLs) with robust social networks to disseminate this information in their communities. Due to COVID-19, we adapted the traditional, in-person, community-based POL model to a virtual platform and assessed the feasibility of this approach.

Methods: Rheumatologists and public health experts from two academic institutions developed training modules in partnership with community leaders and SLE advocates in Boston and Chicago. POLs age >18 years old with and without SLE were recruited through community- and hospital-based networks from Boston and Chicago neighborhoods with high proportions of Black individuals. To train the POLs, five presentations were delivered using an interactive, virtual platform. Modules included: 1) Description of the POL Model, 2-3) Introduction to Clinical Trials, I/II, 4) History of Racism and Clinical Trials, and 5) Clinical Trials: Barriers, Facilitators, and Mediators. POLs completed pre and post tests for the modules, which were compared using paired t-tests. POLs were also taught to use virtual platforms to share information learned with their social networks. POLs reported their dissemination data.

Results: Nineteen POLs were recruited in Boston and 17 in Chicago (Table). In Boston, 18 (95%) were female, 13 (68%) self-identified as Black, and mean age was 55.6 years. In Chicago, 14 (82%) were female, 16 (94%) self-identified as Black, and mean age was 52.8 years. Retention of POLs throughout the training was 82% both in Boston and Chicago. For the two-part clinical trials module, POLs’ knowledge of clinical trials improved significantly overall (mean difference of 3.92 points, 95% CI 3.35-5.89), and separately in Boston (mean difference of 2.80 points, 95% CI 3.33-7.18,) and Chicago (mean difference of 5.45 points, 95% CI 2.42-6.10). As of May 2021, 7 POLs documented 36 encounters and reached 1,023 total individuals; dissemination is ongoing. Boston POLs reached 233 people, including 122 individuals through a sorority newsletter, 104 through Zoom, 6 through phone calls, and 1 in person. Chicago POLs personally reached 240 individuals, including 163 people in a social media group for SLE patients and families, as well as 550 individuals through email interactions.

Conclusion: The POL model was effectively adapted to a virtual program in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Modules developed jointly by academic and community partners were implemented and successfully improved knowledge regarding clinical trials. POL retention was high, possibly due to the convenience of virtual trainings and the sense of community developed through the training sessions. POLs successfully disseminated information virtually about clinical trials. Further studies are needed to determine impact on the diversity of SLE trial enrollment.


Disclosures: K. Taber, None; H. Milaeger, None; J. Williams, None; D. Erickson, None; E. Freeman, None; P. Canessa, None; R. Ramsey-Goldman, None; C. Feldman, Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Taber K, Milaeger H, Williams J, Erickson D, Freeman E, Canessa P, Ramsey-Goldman R, Feldman C. Use of a Popular Opinion Leader Model to Disseminate Information Virtually About Clinical Trial Enrollment to People of Color with Lupus [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021; 73 (suppl 9). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-a-popular-opinion-leader-model-to-disseminate-information-virtually-about-clinical-trial-enrollment-to-people-of-color-with-lupus/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2021

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/use-of-a-popular-opinion-leader-model-to-disseminate-information-virtually-about-clinical-trial-enrollment-to-people-of-color-with-lupus/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology