ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2399

Exercise On Prescription: Barriers to Participation in Community Based Exercise Programmes

Dr Nicola E. Walsh1 and Professor Mike Hurley2, 1Allied Health Professions, University of the West of England, Bristol, United Kingdom, 2School of Rehabilitation Sciences, St George's University of London and Kingston University, London, United Kingdom

Meeting: 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Community programs, exercise and osteoarthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Education/Community Programs

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ARHP)

Background/Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is highly prevalent, disabling and incurs considerable healthcare costs. Symptoms of pain and functional impairment can be ameliorated through participation in regular exercise, and this is encouraged as a long-term self-management strategy. Community based, instructor-led ‘exercise on referral’ schemes are common but infrequently assessed to determine their effectiveness; furthermore, participant and instructor views on these services are rarely reported. The aims of this study were to audit a 12-week local authority subsidised exercise programme and to report on participant and instructor views of this scheme.

Methods: Pre-existing databases were analysed to determine participation and health outcomes, an on-line survey and semi-structured interviews recorded instructor beliefs, whilst focus groups were used to collect data regarding participant views of community-based exercise. (Ethical approval references IRAS 11/SW/0084 and UREC HSC/11/02/27).

Results: In a two-year period 2101 people, age 45 and over with chronic joint pain/OA were referred for exercise. 36% of individuals completed the 12-week scheme; 22% of individuals did not start the programme; the remainder started but did not finish. Improvements were seen in BMI, blood pressure and self-reported activity levels for those that did complete all 12 sessions. Qualitative interviews (n=14) suggested people with OA were sceptical regarding the ability of gym instructors to manage their condition appropriately when exercising, and they feared their condition may worsen in this environment. Feedback from instructors (n=88) demonstrated a reduced specialist knowledge regarding the management of rheumatological conditions, and a recogntion that they required further specialist training to manage OA effectively. Instructors did however consider themselves appropriately trained to manage psychosocial issues, and to motivate individuals to exercise.

Conclusion: Community based exercise schemes are common, but there is an apparent reluctance amongst people with OA to engage with these schemes. Reasons for non-engagement include a perception that instructors are not appropriately qualified to manage their condition safely, and that symptoms may worsen. These beliefs may be vindicated as instructors reported a lack of specialised knowledge to support exercise programmes in people with rheumatological conditions. Although only 36% of individuals referred onto a 12-week exercise scheme completed the programme, these individuals demonstrated physiological improvements and an increase in self-reported activity levels. Future success of these programmes is likely to be dependant on exercise instructors gaining further qualifications in managing rheumatological conditions.


Disclosure:

D. N. E. Walsh,
None;

P. M. Hurley,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2012 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/exercise-on-prescription-barriers-to-participation-in-community-based-exercise-programmes/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology