ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2664

Evaluation Of Osteoporosis Medication Starts In Patients Based On T-Score and FRAX® Absolute Fracture Risk Model In a Large Health Care System

Robert A. Overman1,2 and Chad L. Deal3, 1Eshelman School of Pharmacy - Division of Pharmaceutical Policy and Outcomes, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, 2Rheumatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, 3Dept of Rheum & Imm Dis /A 50, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH

Meeting: 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

Keywords: Fracture risk, osteoporosis, treatment and utilization review

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery

Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)

Background/Purpose: The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) 2008 guidelines recommend treatment for postmenopausal women (PMW) and men ≥ 50 if the T-score is ≤-2.5 at the hip or spine and in patients with osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) if the WHO FRAX® 10-yr fracture risk is ≥3% for hip or ≥20% for major osteoporotic fractures. We evaluated treatment initiation in patients after DXA and compared treatment by rheumatologists to non-rheumatologists.

Methods: The Cleveland Clinic DXA registry was linked with the patient’s electronic medical record using Explorys Inc. PMW and men ≥50 in the registry between 7/2009 and 12/2012, who were anti-osteoporosis medication (AOP) naïve, and had at least one office visit in the years pre and post-DXA were included. New use of AOPs; bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab, raloxifene, calcitonin, and estrogen started within 90, 180, and 365 days post-DXA were collected through 2/2013. Subjects who did not exceed each post-DXA time period were not included in the analysis. Subjects were stratified into 6 groups based on T-score (osteoporosis or osteopenia); FRAX® 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture, ≥20% and/or ≥3% (high-risk) or <20% and <3% (low-risk); and treatment by a rheumatologist or non-rheumatologist. Results are presented as % difference in treatment starts. Group comparisons were made using chi-square with p≤0.05 demonstrating statistical significance.

Results:  Study subjects had a mean age of 70.9 (SD 10.5) and 80.8% (3456/4280) were female. The difference in treatment starts at 90, 180 and 365 days after initial DXA for rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists are presented in Table 1. The groups were osteoporosis at either spine or hip and FRAX® high-risk; osteoporosis and FRAX® low-risk; osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. Rheumatologists were compared to non-rheumatologists. Treatment would be recommended for all 6 groups based on NOF guidelines. Rheumatologists started significantly more patients on AOP than non-rheumatologists at 180 and 365 days in patients with osteoporosis and FRAX ® high-risk, and at all-time points in patients with osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. The greater number of AOP starts in rheumatologists indicate closer adherence to NOF guidelines for treatment.

Conclusion: Rheumatologists started AOP therapy significantly more often in patients who would be recommended for therapy based on NOF guidelines. However, only 67.2% of rheumatology and 54.9% of non-rheumatology FRAX® high-risk with osteoporosis patients were started on AOP by 1-yr. In FRAX® high-risk with osteopenia patients only 40.5% of those treated by a rheumatologist and 27.8% of those not treated by a rheumatologist were started on therapy at 1-yr. These data indicate a care gap in osteoporosis treatment in both physician groups which needs to be addressed to improve quality of care.


Table 1. Percentage of osteoporosis treatment naïve patients started on osteoporosis therapy by Rheumatologists v Non-Rheumatologists based on time periods post-DXA

Treatment Initiation

Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum)

Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum)

% diff

Osteoporosis and FRAX Low-Risk® (Rheum)

Osteoporosis and FRAX® Low-Risk (Non-Rheum)

% diff

Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum)

Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum)

% diff

% within 90 Days (n/group n)

42.4 (70/165)

40.3 (546/1355)

2.1

32.4 (24/74)

42.4 (378/891)

-10.0

24.1 (58/241)

17.3 (269/1554)

6.8*

% within 180 Days (n/group n)

55.6 (85/153)

48.6 (613/1262)

7.0

45.7 (32/70)

51.2 (429/838)

-5.5

32.2 (75/233)

21.9 (316/1440)

10.3**

% within 365 Days (n/group n)

67.2 (90/134)

54.9 (594/1082)

12.3**

58.3 (35/60)

58.7 (423/721)

-0.4

40.5 (81/200)

27.8 (340/1225)

12.7**

Subjects who contributed at least the period days to the analysis were included in percentages for each row

Rheum = subjects who had at least one visit with a rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA

Non-Rheum = subjects not seen by a Rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA

FRAX® High-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture ≥3% and/or 1-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20%

FRAX® Low-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture <3% and 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture <20%

% diff = the difference in percent treated by rheumatologists vs. a non-rheumatology physician

*: p≤0.05     **: p≤0.01



Disclosure:

R. A. Overman,
None;

C. L. Deal,
None.

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-osteoporosis-medication-starts-in-patients-based-on-t-score-and-frax-absolute-fracture-risk-model-in-a-large-health-care-system/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology