Session Information
Title: Health Services Research, Quality Measures and Quality of Care - Innovations in Health Care Delivery
Session Type: Abstract Submissions (ACR)
Background/Purpose: The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) 2008 guidelines recommend treatment for postmenopausal women (PMW) and men ≥ 50 if the T-score is ≤-2.5 at the hip or spine and in patients with osteopenia (T-score -1.0 to -2.5) if the WHO FRAX® 10-yr fracture risk is ≥3% for hip or ≥20% for major osteoporotic fractures. We evaluated treatment initiation in patients after DXA and compared treatment by rheumatologists to non-rheumatologists.
Methods: The Cleveland Clinic DXA registry was linked with the patient’s electronic medical record using Explorys Inc. PMW and men ≥50 in the registry between 7/2009 and 12/2012, who were anti-osteoporosis medication (AOP) naïve, and had at least one office visit in the years pre and post-DXA were included. New use of AOPs; bisphosphonates, teriparatide, denosumab, raloxifene, calcitonin, and estrogen started within 90, 180, and 365 days post-DXA were collected through 2/2013. Subjects who did not exceed each post-DXA time period were not included in the analysis. Subjects were stratified into 6 groups based on T-score (osteoporosis or osteopenia); FRAX® 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture or hip fracture, ≥20% and/or ≥3% (high-risk) or <20% and <3% (low-risk); and treatment by a rheumatologist or non-rheumatologist. Results are presented as % difference in treatment starts. Group comparisons were made using chi-square with p≤0.05 demonstrating statistical significance.
Results: Study subjects had a mean age of 70.9 (SD 10.5) and 80.8% (3456/4280) were female. The difference in treatment starts at 90, 180 and 365 days after initial DXA for rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists are presented in Table 1. The groups were osteoporosis at either spine or hip and FRAX® high-risk; osteoporosis and FRAX® low-risk; osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. Rheumatologists were compared to non-rheumatologists. Treatment would be recommended for all 6 groups based on NOF guidelines. Rheumatologists started significantly more patients on AOP than non-rheumatologists at 180 and 365 days in patients with osteoporosis and FRAX ® high-risk, and at all-time points in patients with osteopenia and FRAX® high-risk. The greater number of AOP starts in rheumatologists indicate closer adherence to NOF guidelines for treatment.
Conclusion: Rheumatologists started AOP therapy significantly more often in patients who would be recommended for therapy based on NOF guidelines. However, only 67.2% of rheumatology and 54.9% of non-rheumatology FRAX® high-risk with osteoporosis patients were started on AOP by 1-yr. In FRAX® high-risk with osteopenia patients only 40.5% of those treated by a rheumatologist and 27.8% of those not treated by a rheumatologist were started on therapy at 1-yr. These data indicate a care gap in osteoporosis treatment in both physician groups which needs to be addressed to improve quality of care.
|
Table 1. Percentage of osteoporosis treatment naïve patients started on osteoporosis therapy by Rheumatologists v Non-Rheumatologists based on time periods post-DXA |
|||||||||
|
Treatment Initiation |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum) |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
Osteoporosis and FRAX Low-Risk® (Rheum) |
Osteoporosis and FRAX® Low-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Rheum) |
Osteopenia and FRAX® High-Risk (Non-Rheum) |
% diff |
|
% within 90 Days (n/group n) |
42.4 (70/165) |
40.3 (546/1355) |
2.1 |
32.4 (24/74) |
42.4 (378/891) |
-10.0 |
24.1 (58/241) |
17.3 (269/1554) |
6.8* |
|
% within 180 Days (n/group n) |
55.6 (85/153) |
48.6 (613/1262) |
7.0 |
45.7 (32/70) |
51.2 (429/838) |
-5.5 |
32.2 (75/233) |
21.9 (316/1440) |
10.3** |
|
% within 365 Days (n/group n) |
67.2 (90/134) |
54.9 (594/1082) |
12.3** |
58.3 (35/60) |
58.7 (423/721) |
-0.4 |
40.5 (81/200) |
27.8 (340/1225) |
12.7** |
|
Subjects who contributed at least the period days to the analysis were included in percentages for each row |
|||||||||
|
Rheum = subjects who had at least one visit with a rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA |
|||||||||
|
Non-Rheum = subjects not seen by a Rheumatologist in the year before and after DXA |
|||||||||
|
FRAX® High-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture ≥3% and/or 1-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture ≥20% |
|||||||||
|
FRAX® Low-Risk = 10-yr risk of hip fracture <3% and 10-yr risk of major osteoporotic fracture <20% |
|||||||||
|
% diff = the difference in percent treated by rheumatologists vs. a non-rheumatology physician |
|||||||||
|
*: p≤0.05 **: p≤0.01
|
|||||||||
Disclosure:
R. A. Overman,
None;
C. L. Deal,
None.
« Back to 2013 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting
ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/evaluation-of-osteoporosis-medication-starts-in-patients-based-on-t-score-and-frax-absolute-fracture-risk-model-in-a-large-health-care-system/
