ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2029

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Compared to Standard Treatment of Patients Starting Infliximab: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of 400 Patients

Silje Syversen1, Guro Goll1, Kristin Jørgensen2, Øystein Sandanger3, Joseph Sexton1, Inge C. Olsen3, Johanna Gehin3, Marthe Brun1, Cato Mørk4, Tore K. Kvien1, Jørgen Jahnsen5, Nils Bolstad3 and Espen Haavardsholm1, 1Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 2Akershus University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 4Akershus Dermatology Center, Lørenskog, Norway, 5Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: TNF-blocking Antibody

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print
Session Information

Date: Monday, November 9, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment III: Axial Spondyloarthritis (2028–2032)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 4:00PM-4:50PM

Background/Purpose: A lack or loss of response to TNFα inhibitors (TNFi) has been associated with low serum drug levels and formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADAb). Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), an individualized treatment strategy based on regular assessments of serum drug levels, has been suggested to optimize efficacy of TNFi. It is still unclear if TDM improves clinical outcomes, and the value of TDM has recently been included in the research agenda across different specialties. This first randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of TDM in a range of immune mediated inflammatory diseases including rheumatic diseases, the NORwegian DRUg Monitoring trial part A (NOR-DRUM (A)) focus on the induction period of infliximab (INX) treatment and aim to assess if TDM is superior to standard treatment in order to achieve remission. 

Methods: In the investigator-initiated, randomized, open-label, multicenter NOR-DRUM (A) study, adult patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), spondyloarthritis (SpA), ulcerative colitis (UC), Crohn’s disease (CD) and psoriasis (Ps) starting INX therapy were randomly assigned administration of INX according to a treatment strategy based on TDM (TDM arm) or to standard administration of INX without TDM (control arm). Study visits were conducted at each infusion. The primary endpoint was remission at week 30. In the TDM arm, the dose and interval were adjusted according to INX trough levels to reach the therapeutic range (Figure 1). If the patient developed significant levels of ADAb, INX was terminated. To guide the investigators, the TDM strategy was integrated in an interactive eCRF. The primary endpoint was analysed by mixed effect logistic regression in the full analyses set (FAS), adjusting for diagnoses. Infections and infusion reactions were specified as adverse events (AEs) of special interest.

Results: We enrolled 411 patients at 21 study centers between January 2017 and December 2018. 398 patients (RA 80, PsA 42, SpA 117, UC 80, CD 57, Ps 22) received the allocated strategy and were included in the FAS population. Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable in both arms. TDM was not found to be superior to standard treatment with regard to the primary outcome. Remission at week 30 was reached in 100 (53%) and 106 (54%) of the patients in the TDM and control arm, respectively (adjusted difference, 1.5%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -8.2 to 11.1, p=0.78) (Figure 2).  Consistent results were shown for all the secondary endpoints (Figure 3) and in the sensitivity analyses. Twenty patients (10%) in the TDM arm and 30 patients (15%) in the control arm developed significant levels of ADAb. The number of adverse events (AE) was similar in both groups, however infusion reactions were less frequent (5 patients (2.5%) vs 16 patients (8.0%)) in the TDM arm (difference 5.5% (95% CI 1.1, 9.8%))  

Conclusion: NOR-DRUM (A) is the first randomized trial to address effectiveness of TDM in rheumatic diseases. In this study, TDM was not superior to standard treatment in order to achieve remission. Although improved safety is indicated by a reduction in infusion reactions, implementation of TDM as a general strategy in the induction period of INX is not supported by the NOR-DRUM (A) study.

Figure 1. Treatment algorithm in the therapeutic drug monitoring group

Figure 2 Forest plot of difference in clinical remission rates, overall results and according to disease Figure shows results of the main analysis (primary outcome) conducted in the full-analysis set TDM= therapeutic drug monitoring

Figure 3 Main secondary outcomes A-F: Generic outcomes; A Proportion of patients in clinical remission, B Patient’s Global Assessment Visual analogue scale 0-100 mm, C Physician’s Global Assessment Visual analogue scale 0-100 mm, D C-reactive protein mg/L, E Erythrocyte sedimentation rate mm/hour, F Serum infliximab level mg/L. G-L: Disease specific activity measures; G: Rheumatoid Arthritis, Disease Activity Score 28 joints, H: Psoriatic Arthritis, Disease Activity Score 28 joints, I: Spondyloarthritis, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, J: Ulcerative Colitis, Partial Mayo Score, K: Crohn’s Disease, Harvey Bradshaw Index, L: Psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. All data except for serum infliximab levels (patients still on medication) are from the full-analysis set. Values are adjusted means with 95% CI.


Disclosure: S. Syversen, roche, 8, Thermo Fisher, 8, Hospira/Pfizer, 8; G. Goll, Novartis, 8, Pfizer, 8, Abbvie, 8, Biogen, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 8, Orion Pharma, 8, Eli Lilly, 8, MSD, 8, Roche, 8, UCB, 8; K. Jørgensen, AOP Orphan, 5, Celltrion, 5, Norgine, 8; �. Sandanger, None; J. Sexton, None; I. Olsen, None; J. Gehin, Roche, 8; M. Brun, None; C. Mørk, Abbot, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, AbbVie, 5, 8, Celagene, 5, 8, Almiral, 5, 8, LEO, 5, 8, ACO, 5, 8; T. Kvien, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Hospira/Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, 9, MSD, 2, 5, 8, 9, Roche, 2, 5, 8, 9, Biogen, 5, 8, BMS, 5, 8, Celltrion, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Orion Pharma, 5, 8, Sanofi and Mylan, 5, 8, Sandoz, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8; J. Jahnsen, None; N. Bolstad, Pfizer, 5, Janssen, 5, Orion Pharma, 8, Napp Pharmaceuticals, 8, Takeda, 8, Roche, 8, Novartis, 8; E. Haavardsholm, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, UCB, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, MSD, 2, Roche, 2, 8, Janssen-Cilag, 2, Gilead, 5, Celegene, 5, 8, Lilly, 5, 8.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Syversen S, Goll G, Jørgensen K, Sandanger �, Sexton J, Olsen I, Gehin J, Brun M, Mørk C, Kvien T, Jahnsen J, Bolstad N, Haavardsholm E. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Compared to Standard Treatment of Patients Starting Infliximab: Results from a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of 400 Patients [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapeutic-drug-monitoring-compared-to-standard-treatment-of-patients-starting-infliximab-results-from-a-multicenter-randomized-controlled-trial-of-400-patients/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/therapeutic-drug-monitoring-compared-to-standard-treatment-of-patients-starting-infliximab-results-from-a-multicenter-randomized-controlled-trial-of-400-patients/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology