ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 1349

Guselkumab Provides Domain-Specific and Comprehensive Efficacy as Assessed Using Composite Endpoints in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Laura Coates1, Christopher Ritchlin2, Laure Gossec3, Philip Helliwell4, Proton Rahman5, Elizabeth Hsia6, Alexa Kollmeier7, Xie Xu8, Chetan Karyekar9, May Shawi10, Wim Noël11, Yusang Jiang12, Shihong Sheng12, Prasheen Agarwal12 and Philip Mease13, 1University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, 3Sorbonne Université and Hôpital Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France, 4Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom, 5Memorial University of Newfoundland, Department of Medicine, St John's, Canada, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 8Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 9Janssen Global Services, LLC, Horsham, PA, 10Janssen Global Services, LLC, Toronto, ON, Canada, 11Janssen Medical Affairs, LLC, Beerse, Belgium, 12Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 13Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Biologicals, Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Sunday, November 8, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment Poster III

Session Type: Poster Session C

Session Time: 9:00AM-11:00AM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS) is a human monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23. GUS has demonstrated efficacy across the various manifestations of PsA including skin, joint, soft tissue and structural damage at Week24 (W24) of DISCOVER-11 and DISCOVER-22, Phase 3 trials of patients (pts) with active PsA. Here we assess GUS efficacy through W24 in both studies utilizing composite indices.

Methods: Adult pts had active PsA despite standard therapies. DISCOVER-1 entry required ≥3 swollen & ≥3 tender joints and CRP ≥0.3 mg/dL; DISCOVER-2 required ≥5 swollen & ≥5 tender joints and CRP ≥0.6 mg/dL. 31% of DISCOVER-1 pts received 1-2 prior TNF inhibitors; DISCOVER-2 pts were biologic-naïve. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to GUS 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, then every 8 weeks (Q8W); or placebo (PBO). Composite endpoints included: Psoriasis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), Minimal Disease Activity (MDA), Very Low Disease Activity (VLDA), Modified Psoriatic Arthritis Responder Criteria (mPsARC; based on evaluation of 68 joints for tenderness and 66 for swelling),3 Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and clinical DAPSA (cDAPSA; determined by excluding CRP). Rates of achieving PASDAS Low/Very Low Disease Activity, MDA, VLDA, and DAPSA/cDAPSA Remission were pooled across studies (see Fig1-2 for response criteria). GUS vs PBO comparisons employed a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with baseline stratification factors or Fisher’s exact test. Pts with missing data were imputed as nonresponders. P-values were not adjusted for multiplicity.

Results: In randomized and treated pts in DISCOVER-1 (N=381) and DISCOVER-2 (N=739), baseline characteristics were generally well-balanced across groups and reflected moderate-to-severe disease activity (Table). Across studies, differences between GUS Q4W or Q8W and PBO were observed as early as Week 8 and continued to increase over time when response was assessed using the joint-focused mPsARC or DAPSA Low Disease Activity (LDA)/Remission composite endpoints. Also in both studies, response rates determined by omitting CRP in calculating cDAPSA were similar to DAPSA results (Fig1). Higher proportions of GUS Q4W- and Q8W-treated than PBO-treated pts also achieved PASDAS (28% and 30% vs 9%), MDA (23% and 24% vs 8%, respectively), VLDA (6% and 4% vs 1%), and remission determined using either DAPSA (10% and 8% vs 2%) or cDAPSA (13% and 9% vs 3%; Fig2).

Conclusion: Regardless of composite index employed or study population assessed, GUS 100 mg Q4W and Q8W provided robust benefits to patients with active PsA across multiple domains, indicating that GUS may offer a novel mechanism by which to treat the diverse manifestations of PsA. Excluding CRP from the DAPSA did not alter the instrument’s ability to discern treatment effect.

References:

    1Deodhar A, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1115-25; 2Mease P, et al. Lancet 2020;395:1126-36; 3Mease PJ, et al. Arthritis Rheum 2005;52:3279–89.


Disclosure: L. Coates, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Celgene, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 2, 5, 8, Amgen Inc., 5, 8, Gilead, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Biogen, 8, Medac, 8, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, MSD, 5; C. Ritchlin, None; L. Gossec, Sandoz, 1, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen Inc., 5, 8, Biogen, 5, 8, Janssen, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 1, 5, 8, Novartis, 5, 8, Pfizer, 1, 5, 8, UCB Pharma, 5, 8, Sanofi, 5, 8; P. Helliwell, AbbVie, 2, 8, Janssen, 2, Pfizer Inc, 8, Celgene, 8, Galapagos, 8, Amgen, 8, Novartis, 2, UCB, 8; P. Rahman, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Abbott, 8, Centacor, 8, Merck, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Roche, 5; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; C. Karyekar, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1, Janssen, 5; M. Shawi, Janssen Global Services, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; W. Noël, Janssen Medical Affairs, LLC, 1, 3; Y. Jiang, None; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Coates L, Ritchlin C, Gossec L, Helliwell P, Rahman P, Hsia E, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Karyekar C, Shawi M, Noël W, Jiang Y, Sheng S, Agarwal P, Mease P. Guselkumab Provides Domain-Specific and Comprehensive Efficacy as Assessed Using Composite Endpoints in Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-domain-specific-and-comprehensive-efficacy-as-assessed-using-composite-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/guselkumab-provides-domain-specific-and-comprehensive-efficacy-as-assessed-using-composite-endpoints-in-patients-with-active-psoriatic-arthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology