ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 0506

Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab, a Monoclonal Antibody Specific to the p19-Subunit of Interleukin-23, Through Week 52 of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Conducted in Biologic-naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis

Iain McInnes1, Proton Rahman2, Alice Gottlieb3, Elizabeth Hsia4, Alexa Kollmeier5, Xie Xu6, Ramanand Subramanian7, Prasheen Agarwal7, Shihong Sheng7, Yusang Jiang7, Bei Zhou7, Désirée van der Heijde8 and Philip Mease9, 1Institute of Infection, Immunity, and Inflammation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2Memorial University of Newfoundland, Department of Medicine, St John's, Canada, 3Department of Dermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, 4Janssen Research & Development, LLC and University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Spring House, PA, 5Janssen Research & Development, LLC, La Jolla, CA, 6Janssen Research & Development, LLC, San Marcos, CA, 7Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Spring House, PA, 8Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 9Seattle Rheumatology Associates, P.L.L.C., Seattle, WA

Meeting: ACR Convergence 2020

Keywords: Psoriatic arthritis

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Friday, November 6, 2020

Title: Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis – Treatment I: Psoriatic Arthritis (0504–0508)

Session Type: Abstract Session

Session Time: 3:00PM-3:50PM

Background/Purpose: Guselkumab (GUS), a monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the p19-subunit of IL-23, is approved to treat psoriasis. Through Week24 (W24) of the Ph3, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled trial in biologic-naïve pts with active PsA (DISCOVER-2), GUS every 4 or 8 weeks (Q4W or Q8W) demonstrated efficacy for joint & skin symptoms and inhibition of structural damage progression (Q4W), and was well tolerated. This study assessed GUS efficacy and safety through W52.

Methods: Biologic-naïve adults with active PsA (≥5 swollen+≥5 tender joints; CRP ≥0.6mg/dL) were randomized (1:1:1) to GUS 100 mg Q4W; GUS 100 mg at W0, W4, Q8W; or PBO. At W24, PBO pts switched to GUS 100 mg Q4W (PBO X Q4W). ACR response rates at W52, based on nonresponder imputation (NRI) for missing data and as observed in pts who continued study agent at W24, are shown. Observed data for additional endpoints, including PsA-modified van der Heijde Sharp (vdH-S) scores derived from blinded radiographic images collected at W0, W24, W52 (or at d/c) and scored in a new Read Campaign, are shown.

Results: 712/739 (96.3%) randomized & treated pts continued study agent at W24; 689/739 (93.2%) completed Wk52. NRI ACR20 response rates continued to increase after W24, and at W52 were 70.6% for GUS Q4W and 74.6% for GUS Q8W (Fig1A). Similar response patterns were observed for the more stringent ACR50/70 criteria (Fig1C,E). Observed ACR (Fig, 1B,D,F), IGA, PASI & MDA/VLDA responses; dactylitis & enthesitis resolution; and mean improvements in HAQ-DI and SF-36 PCS/MCS scores were also sustained through W52 in pts receiving Q4W & Q8W; W52 data for PBO X Q4W pts were generally consistent with other GUS-treated pts (Fig1, Table1). Changes in vdH-S scores were similar for W24-52 (0.62) and W0-24 (0.46) for Q4W; less radiographic progression occurred from W24-52 v W0-24 for Q8W (0.23 v 0.73) & PBO X Q4W (0.25 v 1.00). In 731 GUS-treated pts, 4.2% had SAEs; 1.2% had serious infections; no pt died; and no pt had IBD, opportunistic infections or active TB, or anaphylactic or serum sickness-like reactions.

Conclusion: In biologic-naïve pts with active PsA, GUS elicited sustained improvements in joint & skin symptoms; inhibition of radiographic progression & improvements in physical function, quality of life & composite indices through W52. GUS safety in PsA was similar at W241 & W52 and consistent with GUS safety in psoriasis.

Reference:   

  1. Mease et al. ACR 2019, abs #L13. Arth Rheumatol. 2019;71 S10:5247

Table 1. Observed Efficacy

NRI and Observed ACR20 (A & B), ACR50 (C & D) and ACR70 (E & F) responses through W52 (Note: patients randomized to PBO crossed over to GUS Q4W at W24)


Disclosure: I. McInnes, Novartis, 9, AbbVie, 9, Celgene, 9, Janssen, 2, 9, UCB, 2, 9, Bristol Myers Squibb, 2, 9, AstraZeneca, 2, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, Lilly, 9, LEO, 9; P. Rahman, AbbVie, 5, 8, Amgen, 5, 8, Celgene, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 5, 8, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer, 5, 8, UCB, 5, 8, Abbott, 8, Centacor, 8, Merck, 8, Bristol Myers Squibb, 5, 8, Roche, 5; A. Gottlieb, Janssen, 2, 5, Incyte, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Xbiotech, 2, 9, Boehringer Ingelheim, 2, 5, UCB Pharma, 2, 5, 8, Beiersdorf, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Sun Pharma, 2, 5, Leo Pharma, 5, Avotres Therapeutics, 5; E. Hsia, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; A. Kollmeier, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; X. Xu, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; R. Subramanian, Janssen Research & Development, LLC., 3; P. Agarwal, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; S. Sheng, Janssen Research & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; Y. Jiang, None; B. Zhou, Janssen Reserach & Development, LLC, 3, Johnson & Johnson, 1; D. van der Heijde, AbbVie, 5, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 5, Cyxone, 5, Galapagos NV, 5, Gilead Sciences, Inc., 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5, Eli Lilly, 5, Novartis, 5, Pfizer, 5, UCB Pharma, 5, Amgen Inc., 5, Astellas, 5, AstraZeneca, 5, Boehringer Ingelheim, 5, Celgene, 5, Daiichi-Sankyo, 5, Janssen, 5, Merck, 5, Regeneron, 5, Roche, 5, Sanofi, 5, Takeda, 5, Imaging Rheumatology bv, 3, Eisai, 5; P. Mease, Amgen, 2, 5, 8, Bristol-Myers Squibb, 2, 5, Novartis, 2, 5, 8, Pfizer Inc, 2, 5, 8, Sun, 2, 5, UCB, 2, 5, 8, AbbVie, 2, 5, 8, Gilead, 2, 5, Janssen, 2, 5, 8, Eli Lilly, 2, 5, 8, Galapagos, 5, GlaxoSmithKline, 5.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

McInnes I, Rahman P, Gottlieb A, Hsia E, Kollmeier A, Xu X, Subramanian R, Agarwal P, Sheng S, Jiang Y, Zhou B, van der Heijde D, Mease P. Efficacy and Safety of Guselkumab, a Monoclonal Antibody Specific to the p19-Subunit of Interleukin-23, Through Week 52 of a Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study Conducted in Biologic-naïve Patients with Active Psoriatic Arthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020; 72 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-guselkumab-a-monoclonal-antibody-specific-to-the-p19-subunit-of-interleukin-23-through-week-52-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-conducted-in-bi/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to ACR Convergence 2020

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/efficacy-and-safety-of-guselkumab-a-monoclonal-antibody-specific-to-the-p19-subunit-of-interleukin-23-through-week-52-of-a-phase-3-randomized-double-blind-placebo-controlled-study-conducted-in-bi/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology