ACR Meeting Abstracts

ACR Meeting Abstracts

  • Meetings
    • ACR Convergence 2024
    • ACR Convergence 2023
    • 2023 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • ACR Convergence 2022
    • ACR Convergence 2021
    • ACR Convergence 2020
    • 2020 ACR/ARP PRSYM
    • 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting
    • 2018-2009 Meetings
    • Download Abstracts
  • Keyword Index
  • Advanced Search
  • Your Favorites
    • Favorites
    • Login
    • View and print all favorites
    • Clear all your favorites
  • ACR Meetings

Abstract Number: 2758

Nortriptyline in Knee Arthritis (Nortika): A Randomised Controlled Double Blind Trial of Nortriptyline for Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis

Ben Hudson 1, Leslie Toop 2, Jonathan Williman 1, Gary Hooper 1, Dee Mangin 1, John Alchin 1, Browyn Thompson 1 and Lisa Stamp1, 1University of Otago, Christchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand, 2UNiversity of Otago, Chirstchurch, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand

Meeting: 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

Keywords: osteoarthritis and analgesics

  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print
Session Information

Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2019

Title: 5T090: Osteoarthritis – Clinical II: Novel Therapies (2756–2761)

Session Type: ACR Abstract Session

Session Time: 2:30PM-4:00PM

Background/Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common joint disease and is a major cause of pain and disability There is currently no cure for OA and management is focused on relief of pain and maintenance of function Tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) have long been used in other chronic pain conditions, but their analgesic effect in OA has not previously been evaluated. To investigate the analgesic effectiveness of nortriptyline in people with OA of the knee.

Methods: We undertook a two-arm parallel-group 1:1 double blind randomised placebo-controlled trial. Participants were recruited from orthopaedic outpatient clinics, primary care, and by public advertising. 205 adults with knee OA as defined by the American College of Rheumatology clinical criteria for the classification of idiopathic OA of the knee, and with pain rated as >20 points on the 50 point Western Ontario and McMaster University (WOMAC) pain sub-scale, were randomised to receive either nortriptyline (n=103) or placebo (n=102) in addition to their usual analgesia for 14 weeks. Treatment was divided into a dose-adjustment phase (weeks 0 to 7) and a steady-dose phase (weeks 8 to 14).  Participants were instructed to commence taking one capsule (25mg of nortriptyline or placebo) daily for two weeks at which time they were contacted by a research nurse by telephone who advised participants to increase (or decrease) their dose by one capsule per day according to the participant’s level of knee pain and adverse effects.  Further dose adjustments occurred at four, six and eight weeks, up to a maximum dose of four capsules daily (100 mg nortriptyline daily in the treatment group).  Primary outcome was knee pain at 14 weeks measured using the WOMAC pain sub-scale.  Secondary outcomes included function, stiffness, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID), opioid and/or paracetamol use, participant global assessment, and adverse effects at 14 weeks.

Results: The baseline adjusted mean WOMAC pain subscale score at week 14 was 6.15 points lower (95% CI -0.26 to 12.6, p = 0.060) in the nortriptyline vs. the placebo arm.  Differences in secondary outcomes generally favoured the nortriptyline arm, but were small and unlikely to be clinically relevant.  For example the number needed to treat to achieve one responder was 10 (95% CI = 4.2 to Inf, p = 0.14).  Dry mouth (87% vs. 51%, p < 0.001), constipation (69% vs. 30%, p < 0.001), and sweating (31% vs. 21%, p = 0.033) were all more commonly reported by participants taking nortriptyline.

Conclusion: This study suggests nortriptyline provides a clinically insignificant reduction in pain in people with knee OA.  Adverse effect profile was as expected.
Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12614000683639.


Disclosure: B. Hudson, None; L. Toop, None; J. Williman, None; G. Hooper, None; D. Mangin, None; J. Alchin, None; B. Thompson, None; L. Stamp, None.

To cite this abstract in AMA style:

Hudson B, Toop L, Williman J, Hooper G, Mangin D, Alchin J, Thompson B, Stamp L. Nortriptyline in Knee Arthritis (Nortika): A Randomised Controlled Double Blind Trial of Nortriptyline for Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis [abstract]. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019; 71 (suppl 10). https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nortriptyline-in-knee-arthritis-nortika-a-randomised-controlled-double-blind-trial-of-nortriptyline-for-pain-in-knee-osteoarthritis/. Accessed .
  • Tweet
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

« Back to 2019 ACR/ARP Annual Meeting

ACR Meeting Abstracts - https://acrabstracts.org/abstract/nortriptyline-in-knee-arthritis-nortika-a-randomised-controlled-double-blind-trial-of-nortriptyline-for-pain-in-knee-osteoarthritis/

Advanced Search

Your Favorites

You can save and print a list of your favorite abstracts during your browser session by clicking the “Favorite” button at the bottom of any abstract. View your favorites »

All abstracts accepted to ACR Convergence are under media embargo once the ACR has notified presenters of their abstract’s acceptance. They may be presented at other meetings or published as manuscripts after this time but should not be discussed in non-scholarly venues or outlets. The following embargo policies are strictly enforced by the ACR.

Accepted abstracts are made available to the public online in advance of the meeting and are published in a special online supplement of our scientific journal, Arthritis & Rheumatology. Information contained in those abstracts may not be released until the abstracts appear online. In an exception to the media embargo, academic institutions, private organizations, and companies with products whose value may be influenced by information contained in an abstract may issue a press release to coincide with the availability of an ACR abstract on the ACR website. However, the ACR continues to require that information that goes beyond that contained in the abstract (e.g., discussion of the abstract done as part of editorial news coverage) is under media embargo until 10:00 AM ET on November 14, 2024. Journalists with access to embargoed information cannot release articles or editorial news coverage before this time. Editorial news coverage is considered original articles/videos developed by employed journalists to report facts, commentary, and subject matter expert quotes in a narrative form using a variety of sources (e.g., research, announcements, press releases, events, etc.).

Violation of this policy may result in the abstract being withdrawn from the meeting and other measures deemed appropriate. Authors are responsible for notifying colleagues, institutions, communications firms, and all other stakeholders related to the development or promotion of the abstract about this policy. If you have questions about the ACR abstract embargo policy, please contact ACR abstracts staff at [email protected].

Wiley

  • Online Journal
  • Privacy Policy
  • Permissions Policies
  • Cookie Preferences

© Copyright 2025 American College of Rheumatology